Client Alerts & Insights
DOL’s New Assessment Procedures for Calculating Civil Monetary Penalties Significantly Increases Liability for Employers.
December 21, 2023
Authored By:
The U.S. Department of Labor recently changed how it assesses civil money penalties against employers for violating federal child labor laws, which could significantly increase fines for hiring underage children to perform dangerous jobs or keeping inaccurate records.
In a memo to regional administrators and district directors, Administrator Jessica Looman said the Wage and Hour Division would no longer fine employers for nonserious injury and noninjury violations on a per child basis and instead issue fines on a per violation basis.
The new per violation assessment has the potential to increase employer penalties significantly. For instance, if there are three separate violations relative to a specific child’s employment—for employing an underage child, for having the child work in a dangerous job prohibited under federal law, and for keeping inaccurate records—the employer could be assessed with three separate penalties, each of which could reach the statutory maximum of $15,138. Under the prior per child basis, the maximum penalty could not exceed $15,138, regardless of the number of violations relative to a child’s unlawful employment. These increased penalties can be adjusted.
In calculating the penalty amount, WHD will apply the statutory maximum of $15,138 and then increase or decrease the amount of the fine based on aggravating or mitigating “gravity” factors and the size of the business. The agency will first look at gravity factors such as the number of minors employed, their ages, the length of their employment, the hours of their employment, whether the work is hazardous, and the number of repeat or willful violations. Once these factors have been considered, the agency will then adjust the fine based on the size of the business, its financial resources, the size of its workforce, and its annual sales. Finally, the agency will consider the size of the business and the gravity of the violation, as well as regulatory factors, to determine the final penalty amount.
In addition, employers can face increased liability under the FLSA, which prohibits the shipment of “hot goods” that were produced in an establishment in or about which oppressive child labor occurred. The previous policy limited the assessments for hot goods cases on a per investigation basis. The new policy calls for a per shipment or delivery for shipment basis.
Under the FLSA, employers also are required to record a birth date for every employee under the age of 19 and retain those records for three years. Notably, the new policy changes the assessment for child labor recordkeeping violations. Recordkeeping violations will now be assessed per employee. For example, if an employer fails to keep records of dates of birth for five of its employees under the age of 19, the agency may assess fines for five separate recordkeeping violations.
If you have any questions on this topic, please contact a member of our Labor & Employment Practice Group.
Margarita Krncevic at mkrncevic@beneschlaw.com or 216.363.6285.
Rick Hepp at rhepp@beneschlaw.com or 216.363.4657.
Alyson Waite at awaite@beneschlaw.com or 216.363.4414.
Latest News
Connecticut Broadens Data Privacy Act Requirements Effective July 1, 2026
Key Takeaways Revised Applicability Scope and Exemptions Effective July 1, 2026, the CTDPA’s existing applicability thresholds are reduced, resulting in …
SCOTUS Extends FAA Exemption to Last-Mile Drivers: What the Flowers Foods decision means for motor carriers and transportation providers
On May 28, 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a unanimous decision in Flowers Foods, Inc. v. Brock, expanding reach of the Federal Arbitration Act’s (“FAA”) Section 1 exemption for transportation workers engaged in interstate commerce. The Court held that a worker who transports goods on an intrastate leg of an interstate journey can qualify for Section 1’s exemption without crossing state lines or interacting with vehicles that do. This decision has significant implications for motor carriers and transportation providers that rely on arbitration agreements to resolve disputes with independent contractors and employee drivers.
Beyond the Buzzwords: State AGs Put Enforcement Muscle Behind Algorithmic Pricing and Age Verification Crackdowns
State AGs are doubling down—across party lines—on consumer protection, with a sharp focus on vulnerable groups and increased scrutiny of algorithmic pricing models and online age verification practices.
California SB 54 Is Here: What Companies Using Plastic Packaging Need To Do Now
Learn how California’s SB 54 impacts companies using plastic packaging, including key compliance deadlines, producer responsibilities, and steps to reduce risk under new recycling and sustainability regulations.