Client Alerts & Insights

Several States Look to Impose Stricter Non-Immigrant Hiring Procedures with Pending E-Verify Legislation

April 4, 2025

In response to the Trump administration’s focus on immigration enforcement, state legislatures have proposed bills requiring employers to participate in the United States Department of Homeland Security’s E-Verify program. Currently twelve states have mandatory E-Verify participation bills pending[1].

The bills would require employers to use the federal E-Verify system to confirm job candidates are authorized to work in the United States. E-Verify confirms a worker’s authorization based on federal records from the Department of Homeland Security and the Social Security Administration.

Some states, including Idaho, Indiana, Montana, and Texas, are proposing completely new E-Verify enrollment requirements which would mandate that employers use E-Verify after reviewing acceptable residency and identification documents when completing the Employment Eligibility Verification (Form I-9) with new hires.

Other states are attempting to expand existing requirements and increase noncompliance penalties. For example, Florida’s HB 1033 would revoke and employer’s business licenses and impose a fine of up to $10,000 for employing an unauthorized worker.

Currently nine states require all employers, with limited exemptions for small businesses, to participate in E-Verify (Alabama, Arizona, Florida, Georgia, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, and Utah).

As discussed in our previous alert, the potential expansion of E-Verify requirements is one of many measures that could reshape the U.S. immigration landscape, impacting businesses, workers, and families.

To manage or reduce the impact of the potential requirements, businesses can:

  • Conduct internal I-9 audits, rectify errors and ensure compliance with U.S. immigration laws.
  • Move mission-critical projects and associated foreign talent to offices outside the U.S. to ensure business continuity.

For more information, please contact a member of Benesch’s Immigration Practice Group.

Alan Rothenbuecher at arothenbuecher@beneschlaw.com or 216.363.4436.

Margarita Krncevic at mkrncevic@beneschlaw.com or 216.363.6285.

Alyson Waite at awaite@beneschlaw.com or 216.363.4179.

[1] ID, IN, MA, MI, MT, NE, NJ, OK, OR, PA, RI, TX

Latest News

Client Alerts & Insights 5.29.26

SCOTUS Extends FAA Exemption to Last-Mile Drivers: What the Flowers Foods decision means for motor carriers and transportation providers

On May 28, 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a unanimous decision in Flowers Foods, Inc. v. Brock, expanding reach of the Federal Arbitration Act’s (“FAA”) Section 1 exemption for transportation workers engaged in interstate commerce. The Court held that a worker who transports goods on an intrastate leg of an interstate journey can qualify for Section 1’s exemption without crossing state lines or interacting with vehicles that do. This decision has significant implications for motor carriers and transportation providers that rely on arbitration agreements to resolve disputes with independent contractors and employee drivers.