Benesch, Friedlander, Coplan & Aronoff LLP Benesch, Friedlander, Coplan & Aronoff LLP
PeopleServices

Menu

  • People
  • Services
  • Resources
  • Locations
  • Careers
  • About
  • Contact
New Hampshire Joins Data Protection Trend, Passes Comprehensive Data Protection Law
  1. Resources
June 28, 2012

The U.S. Supreme Court Rules on the ACA - The Individual Mandate is Constitutional

By: Daniel J. O'Brien
Client Bulletins
Related Files
  • SupremeCourtRulesonACA_IndividualMandateConstitutional
Author : Daniel J. O'Brien

This morning, June 28, 2012, the U.S. Supreme Court released their decision upholding the constitutionality of the individual mandate - the centerpiece of President Obama’s health care law.

The individual mandate requires that all Americans maintain “minimum essential” health insurance coverage. Beginning in 2014, individuals that do not comply with the mandate must make a “shared responsibility payment” to the Federal Government. The amount of the payment varies with household income, subject to a floor and a ceiling based on the average annual premium that the individual would have to pay for private health insurance.

Interestingly, the Supreme Court rejected the Obama administration’s argument that the individual mandate was permissible under the Commerce Clause, instead concluding that the individual mandate was permissible under Congress’ taxing authority.

Another key provision of the Affordable Care Act is the expansion of the Medicaid program. The Affordable Care Act expands the scope of the Medicaid program and increases the number of individuals that states must cover. For example, the Act requires state programs to provide Medicaid coverage to adults that earn up to 133 percent of the federal poverty level. Many states only provide Medicaid to individuals whose incomes are significantly lower.

While the Act increases federal funding to cover the states’ costs in expanding coverage, it also threatened to withdraw all federal Medicaid funds for failure to comply. This morning, the Supreme Court ruled that while it was permissible to expand the Medicaid program, the Act could not withdraw existing Medicaid funds for states that opt out of the expansion.

A copy of the full opinion can be found here.

Additional Information

For more information on the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision, please feel free to contact any member of our health care practice group for a further discussion.

Benesch's Health Care Practice Group

Cleveland
Gregory Binford at 216.363.4617 or gbinford@beneschlaw.com  
Harry Brown at 216.363.4606 or hbrown@beneschlaw.com  
W. Cliff Mull at 216.363.4198 or cmull@beneschlaw.com  
Daniel J. O'Brien at 216.363.4691 or dobrien@beneschlaw.com  
Alan Schabes at 216.363.4589 or aschabes@beneschlaw.com  

Columbus
Frank Carsonie at 614.223.9361 or fcarsonie@beneschlaw.com  
Janet Feldkamp at 614.223.9328 or jfeldkamp@beneschlaw.com   
Martha Sweterlitsch at 614.223.9367 or msweterlitsch@beneschlaw.com  

White Plains
Ari J. Markenson 914.682.6822 or amarkenson@beneschlaw.com

  • Benesch Healthcare+
Stay Current. Sign up for our eAlerts
>
  • 2025 Benesch
  • Disclaimers
  • Privacy Policy
  • Related Sites
  • GDPR Statement
  • Terms
  • Client Payment Portal
  • Careers
Twitter
Facebook
LinkedIn