Client Alerts & Insights
Tracking “Project Firewall” and Its Significant Expansion of H-1B Enforcement Activity
December 4, 2025
Authored By:
On September 19, 2025, the Department of Labor (DOL) announced a substantial expansion of its enforcement authority through a new initiative known as Project Firewall, marking the most aggressive shift in H-1B oversight in more than a decade. Historically, most H-1B investigations began only after an employee complaint. Under Project Firewall, however, the Secretary of Labor may now initiate H-1B investigations based solely on “reasonable cause.” Given the unprecedented level of cooperation between government agencies, it is not surprising that immigration practitioners are reporting a notable increase in investigative activity. To date, approximately 175–200 investigations under Project Firewall have been initiated, signaling vigorous and proactive enforcement in the H-1B space.
Key Elements of Project Firewall
1. Expanded Scope of Review – Investigations are now focusing on:
- Required wage compliance and payroll accuracy
- Alignment of actual job duties with those listed in the H-1B petition
- Accuracy of worksite locations and relocation reporting
- Maintenance of fully compliant Public Access Files
- H-1B-dependent employer practices
- Third-party placement arrangements, including staffing and consulting environments
2. Consequences for Non-Compliance – Employers found non-compliant may face:
- Back wage assessments
- Civil monetary penalties
- Debarment from the H-1B program for up to three years
- Referral to USCIS or other agencies for additional action
Recommended Employer Action Steps
Given the heightened enforcement environment, employers should take immediate steps to review and strengthen their H-1B compliance programs:
- Conduct an Internal H-1B Compliance Audit – Review LCAs, wage documentation, worksite postings and Public Access Files for completeness and accuracy.
- Reconfirm Wage Compliance – Ensure all H-1B workers are being paid the required wage at all times, including during reduced hours or non-productive periods.
- Assess Job Duties and Organizational Changes – If job duties or responsibilities have changed, determine whether an H-1B amendment is required.
- Review Third-Party Placement Arrangements – Confirm that contracts, supervision structures and worksite details accurately reflect actual working conditions.
- Educate HR, Managers, and Onboarding Teams – Ensure internal stakeholders understand when H-1B updates or amendments are triggered.
- Prepare for Potential DOL Requests – Establish a protocol for responding to inquiries or audits, including record preservation and centralized documentation.
Conclusion
With Project Firewall investigations steadily increasing, employers should act now to mitigate risk by proactively reviewing their H-1B processes and documentation. Our immigration team is available to assist with internal audits, policy reviews and employer-specific compliance strategies.
Latest News
DOJ’s National Fraud Enforcement Division Issues Corporate Enforcement Directive, Signaling Heightened Scrutiny of Corporate Fraud
DOJ’s new enforcement framework reinforces that corporate fraud investigations will remain a significant enforcement priority, particularly in healthcare, government contracting, tax and international trade.
Lessons from Kai Spears v. The New York Times Co.: A Historic Defamation Verdict
The first defamation verdict against The New York Times in more than 50 years highlights the significant litigation risks that can arise when reporting relies on inadequately vetted anonymous sources and critical editorial safeguards are not followed.
Back To Wright Line: NLRB Resets Standards for Workplace Misconduct
Employers have regained greater flexibility to address offensive or abusive employee conduct that occurs during union activity or other activity protected by the National Labor Relations Act. On September 23, 2026, the National Labor Relations Board (the “Board”) issued a significant decision in Lion Elastomers LLC, 375 NLRB No. 41, restoring the prior standard for evaluating discipline when employee misconduct occurs during protected concerted activity from General Motors LLC, 369 NLRB No. 127.
Can an Algorithm Commit a Tort? The Circuit Split Over Section 230
A growing circuit split is reshaping the scope of Section 230 immunity. While the Fourth and Ninth Circuits continue to view algorithmic recommendations as protected publisher conduct, the Third Circuit has taken a narrower approach, holding that certain algorithm-driven content recommendations may constitute a platform’s own conduct and therefore fall outside Section 230’s protections.