Benesch, Friedlander, Coplan & Aronoff LLP Benesch, Friedlander, Coplan & Aronoff LLP
PeopleServices

Menu

  • People
  • Services
  • Resources
  • Locations
  • Careers
  • About
  • Contact
New Hampshire Joins Data Protection Trend, Passes Comprehensive Data Protection Law
  1. Services
  2. Litigation

Consumer Protection & Class Actions

Benesch’s Consumer Protection & Class Actions team delivers strategic defense for global brands, national companies and emerging businesses facing high-stakes class-action litigation. We don’t merely defend class actions: we take control of cases, employing innovative approaches that avoid costly litigation and deliver favorable outcomes.

Exceptional Track Record

Our team has resolved hundreds of high-stakes consumer attacks across the nation that have threatened to cripple industry-leading companies and has defended clients in over 300 high-stakes class action matters.

Benesch has the knowledge and experience to defeat the most common and most dangerous consumer protection claims. Our deep experience spans consumer fraud, false advertising, privacy violations, antitrust claims and emerging issues under state and federal consumer protection laws. The numbers speak for themselves:

  • 100+ consumer fraud and deceptive trade practices cases won
  • 100+ California Unfair Competition Law claims defeated
  • 100+ federal statutory claims under TCPA, FCRA, FACTA and more resolved
  • 50+ retail consumer class actions neutralized 

Our dominance is recognized in BTI Litigation Outlook, where we have been named a “Litigation Standout in Class Action Litigation,” a distinction reserved for the top 17% of all firms nationwide.

Focused Experience to Defeat the Most Litigated Claims

With decades of experience, we are the firm that has seen it all before and knows how to win. We are particularly experienced in:

Consumer Privacy

Our team has handled more than 60 class actions under the Federal Wiretapping Act, Video Privacy Protection Act, California Invasion of Privacy Act and emerging privacy laws. While others scramble to understand these complex technologies, our attorneys have mastered both the technical landscape and the evolving legal frameworks to defeat consumer claims.

Telemarketing/TCPA

With 100+ TCPA cases across 30+ states, we have established a strong track record securing summary judgment, winning dismissals and defeating class certification. Global corporations choose us as national telemarketing counsel because we don’t just win cases, we create legal strategies that prevent future attacks.

Biometric Privacy

As BIPA litigation exploded, Benesch was at the forefront of BIPA defense. Our team has pioneered novel constitutional defenses, HIPAA-based arguments and critical arbitration defenses that have neutralized more than 20 biometric class actions, establishing precedents that protect our clients’ operational integrity. Clients also trust Benesch to draft air-tight biometric policies that prevent future litigation.

Retail & E-Commerce

Our decades-long specialization in retail class action defense has produced a string of precedent-setting victories. Benesch stands alone with a dedicated practice that has defended and won hundreds of high-stakes retail class action cases.

Innovative Litigation Strategies

Our class action team develops and implements customized litigation strategies and has successfully defeated class action lawsuits with innovative tactics, such as:

  • Early-stage strikes that seize control before discovery costs mount
  • Bifurcation strategies that impede our opponents’ momentum
  • Groundbreaking use of metadata and video evidence that exposes manufactured claims
  • Novel legal arguments that have rewritten the class action landscape in our clients’ favor

Preemptive Protection

Our team works directly with our clients to proactively engineer customized solutions that minimize exposure to consumer protection claims. Benesch provides:

  • Global and national guidance for corporations requiring multijurisdiction protection
  • Compliance review to ensure company policies, marketing materials and more are immune from consumer attacks
  • Policy, agreement and marketing material design that complies with federal, state and local consumer protection laws
  • Compliance program leadership that addresses vulnerabilities before class action firms can exploit them

When aggressive class action attorneys target your business with bet-the-company class actions, Benesch is the team to protect your business and brand.

Our Work in Action – Representative Examples

  • Kohl’s. Won an affirmative motion to strike class claims, precluding any class from seeking monetary relief, in a case alleging deceptive pricing practices. Our motion advanced novel arguments based on the class waiver provision in our client’s terms of use that had not been raised in other, nearly identical litigation. 
  • Stein Mart. Won on summary judgment in a pricing case alleging that our client listed deceptive “compare at” reference prices on its price tags. We persuaded the court as a matter of law that our client’s practices were not deceptive. This was the only pricing class action to date where a judge held as a matter of law that the retailer’s pricing practices were not deceptive. 
  • L.L. Bean. Secured dismissal of a heavily publicized series of putative class actions across the country alleging that our client’s changes to its satisfaction guarantee denied customers the benefit of the guarantee in place when they made their purchases. Each court found that plaintiffs lacked standing to pursue their claims because they had not suffered a concrete injury and their purported future inability to make returns was too speculative.
  • Red Wing. Obtained a complete dismissal in state court of a class action brought under the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act, creating incredibly helpful case law in Florida in the process. The Fourth District Court of Appeals affirmed the decision after oral argument  and the Florida Supreme Court denied review. 
  • Albertsons. Won a rare affirmative motion to deny class certification for Albertsons, cutting short a putative class action under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act at the pleading stage. 
  • Blistex. Obtained dismissal with prejudice of a consumer fraud class action brought against Blistex alleging that the packaging of one of its products did not allow the consumer to obtain the entirety of the contents. 

Experience

  • Obtained dismissal of VPPA class action after establishing that the at-issue videos involving Facebook “Meta pixel” were publicly available and did not require subscription to access.
  • Represented multiple defendants in class action lawsuits for alleged violations of the Florida FCCPA by sending customer contact emails between the hours of 9:00 p.m. and 8:00 a.m.
  • Obtained voluntary dismissal of VPPA class action involving Facebook “Meta pixel” after establishing that the plaintiff subscribed to services specifically for the purpose of manufacturing litigation.
  • Won summary judgment in certified nationwide TCPA class action on the grounds that there was insufficient evidence that the seller sent or authorized the at-issue communications.
  • Forced voluntary dismissal with prejudice of putative TCPA class action based on bad faith claim-splitting argument.
  • Defended 10+ retailers involving claims under federal Wiretap Act and/or California Invasion of Privacy law concerning recording of chat conversation, use of session replay technology, and/or use of Facebook “Meta pixel.”
  • Won summary judgment in TCPA action on the basis that the customer could not unilaterally revoke contractually provided consent.
  • Defeated class certification and prevailed on Daubert arguments dismissing the opinions of class plaintiffs’ damages and consumer survey experts, successfully arguing on behalf of telehealth company that plaintiffs' claims involved too many individualized questions regarding injury and damages, rendering class treatment inappropriate.

  • Defended more than 80 class actions across the country alleging deceptive pricing practices with an unmatched track record, including in cases where her clients prevailed at trial, summary judgment, class certification, and multiple appeals.*
  • Defended a dozen putative class action alleging that the sale of customer information to data cooperatives and list brokers, who in turn sold their information to telemarketers and other advertisers without notice or their consent, in violation of state law.*
  • Secured dismissal of consumer class action after using metadata on the as-filed complaint to prove that the complaint was finalized within days of the purchase at issue, and weeks before the date that the other side told the Court it was prepared.*
  • Defended the largest cosmetics company in North America in four putative class actions in both federal and state court concerning advertising representations made in relation to its branded cosmetic products.*
  • After negotiating a very low-cost settlement in this class action alleging violations of California’s Song-Beverly Credit Card Act, we opposed Plaintiff’s request for attorneys’ fees, and the court awarded only $135,711 of the $440,445 requested by Plaintiff.*
  • Defeated motion for catalyst fees seeking in excess of $1mm, where Plaintiff argued that client’s change in business practice resulted from the class action they filed.*
  • Secured dismissal of four highly-publicized class actions filed across the country against beloved clothing and outdoor recreation equipment retailer relating to changes to its return policy.*
  • Obtained a dismissal of several putative class action seeking refunds for allegedly defective medical devices, despite the fact that product had been subject to a voluntary recall.*
  • Secured dismissal with prejudice for national consumer health company in defense of consumer class action concerning product labeling.
  • Represented national consumer goods company in putative class action concerning alleged product defect.
  • Managed defense of series of class actions concerning the recall of a consumer good.
  • Defended threatened class action regarding the labeling of popular snack foods product.
  • Defended multiple class actions regarding the labeling of over-the-counter pharmacy products.
  • Successfully forced voluntary dismissal of a putative class action alleging violations of California Labor Laws.
  • Obtained summary judgment on behalf of financial institution for alleged violations of Fair Credit Reporting Act for allegedly misreporting spouse as co-holder of account.
  • Successfully defeated nationwide putative class action for alleged violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act by compelling arbitration on an individual basis despite the consumer contesting that she was not bound by arbitration agreement.
  • Won motion to dismiss claim involving serial-plaintiff for alleged violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, Ohio Telephone Solicitation Act, and Ohio Consumer Sales Practices Act.
  • Obtained summary judgment on behalf of defendant in Telephone Consumer Protection Act claim on grounds that the consumer did not use a reasonable method of attempting to revoke consent.

  • Represented Fortune 500 cellular phone manufacturer in putative class action stemming from alleged defects in mobile application. Obtained dismissal of several key claims resulting in a favorable class-wide settlement of the remaining claims.*
  • Represented major insurer in putative class action alleging that insurer improperly clawed back commissions.*
  • Represented major insurer in putative class action brought by former insurance broker alleging improper commission splitting and administrative expense deductions. Secured favorable settlement after obtaining dismissal of all claims without prejudice.*
  • Represented concessionaire in putative class action in Illinois state court alleging that concessionaire misled consumers regarding alleged defects in concessionaire’s parking meter mobile application. Prevailed on motion to dismiss.*
  • Assisted in securing judgment in favor of Fortune 500 credit card issuer in an antitrust MDL after three-week bench trial. Helped convince the Second Circuit Court of Appeals to unanimously affirm the judgment.*
  • Represents companies defending class action lawsuits that allege violations of various federal statutes, including the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.
  • Obtained voluntary dismissal of nationwide putative class action against retailer of consumer products, alleging violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, 47 USC 227(b).
  • Defended moving company for alleged violation of Truth-In-Leasing Regulations in putative nationwide class action.
  • Successfully resolved multi-state class action alleging violations of Truth-In-Leasing Regulations by motor carrier.
  • Successfully struck class allegations in putative state-wide class action.
  • Successfully defended a nationwide putative class action seeking to hold ADT vicariously liable for approximately 5 million phone calls made by an independent third-party in alleged violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act
  • Successfully defended a nationwide putative class action seeking to hold DISH vicariously liable for 1+ million phone calls made by over a dozen third-parties in alleged violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.
  • Developed policies and procedures for complying with federal Fair Credit Reporting Act obligations (and state-level versions of the law) for nationwide business in connection with employment applications.
  • Obtained denial of class certification on behalf of corporate defendant in nationwide putative class action alleging violations of the Telephone Consumer Sales Protection Act.
  • Successfully recovered $400,000 of wrongfully diverted funds in commission payments.
  • Defended insurance company in suit seeking certification of class action for alleged wrongful denial of insurance benefits.
  • Defended corporation in suit seeking certification of state wide class action for alleged product defect.
  • Defended corporation in nationwide class action suit for alleged violations of the disclosure and adverse action requirements of the Fair Credit Reporting Act.
  • Defended corporation in suit seeking class certification of claims alleging breach of contract, unjust enrichment, and violations of the Ohio Valentine (antitrust) Act.
  • Represented company for alleged cybersquatting, violations of Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, and false designation of origin.
  • Defended corporation, directors, and majority shareholders in suit alleging fraud, successor-liability, Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act liability, and seeking to pierce corporate veil to holder shareholders individually liable.
  • Won trial defending corporation in claim alleging breach of contract and violations of the Ohio Consumer Sales Practices Act.
  • Won trial on behalf of corporation in suit seeking damages for breach of contract. Decision affirmed on appeal.
Key Contacts
  • Meegan Brooks
    E-Commerce
    San Francisco
  • Mark S. Eisen
    Litigation
    Chicago
  • Kevin B. Frankel
    Litigation
    San Francisco
  • Laura E. Kogan
    Litigation
    Cleveland
  • David M. Krueger
    Litigation
    Cleveland
  • Stephanie A. Sheridan
    Litigation
    San Francisco

View full team

  • Litigation
Articles and Presentations
June 2, 2025
David M. Krueger, Meegan Brooks, and Carlo Lipson publish article in Federal Civil Practice | "Ninth Circuit Upholds Mass Arbitration Consolidation"
June 24, 2024
Noteworthy Biometric Information Updates to the Ever-Changing Legal Landscape
May 21, 2024
“Forever Chemicals:” PFAS Litigation Expands In the Consumer Class Action Space

View all

News
July 21, 2025
Benesch Partner Meegan Brooks Named a 2025 Law360 Rising Star in Class Actions
June 28, 2021
Nora Cook and David Krueger mentioned in Law360 | "Bank Shakes TCPA Row After Facebook Autodialer Ruling"
April 5, 2021
Mark S. Eisen quoted in Law360 | "Focus Turns To Congress As Justices Narrow TCPA Liability"

View all

  • 2025 Benesch
  • Disclaimers
  • Privacy Policy
  • Related Sites
  • GDPR Statement
  • Terms
  • Client Payment Portal
  • Careers
Twitter
Facebook
LinkedIn