Client Alerts & Insights
Michigan Employers May Soon Face Increased Minimum Wage, Expanded Sick Leave Requirements
July 29, 2022
Authored By:
A Michigan court recently held that the current versions of the state’s minimum wage and paid sick leave statutes are unconstitutional due to legislative foul play, immediately voiding the existing laws. Mothering Justice v. Nessel, No. 21-000095-MM (July 19, 2022). Now, absent a stay pending appeal or further legislative action, the original form of the laws—which had a far broader scope—will take effect, leaving most employers’ current policies noncompliant.
Background
In 2018, facing dual ballot initiatives regarding minimum wage and paid sick leave, the Michigan legislature quickly enacted the proposed legislation in order to maintain control over the process. Before the legislation took effect, the legislature approved amendments that significantly revised key provisions.
The amendment to the minimum wage law delayed the increase to $12-per-hour from 2022 to 2030, removed additional inflation-based increases, and eliminated provisions regarding tipped employees.
With respect to paid sick leave, the amendments created an exemption for employers of fewer than 50 employees, excluded FLSA exempt employees, reduced the rate of accrual, reduced the annual leave requirement from 72 hours to 40 hours for large employers, added a frontloading option, narrowed the permissible reasons for leave, and eliminated an antiretaliation provision.
The Legal Challenge
After a group of employee advocates filed suit challenging this “adopt and amend” strategy, the Michigan Court of Claims ruled that the legislature’s conduct violated the plain language of Michigan’s constitution and intentionally undermined the intent of the People of Michigan. The court voided the amendments, allowing the original ballot initiatives to take effect.
A motion to stay the decision has been filed and a hearing on the motion is scheduled for August 2, 2022. Unless a stay is granted, the original form of the ballot initiatives will take effect as soon as August 9, 2022 according to Michigan’s Wage & Hour Division. Of course, the original decision may be overturned on appeal and the legislature may take further action.
Implications
If the original ballot initiatives become law, minimum wage in Michigan will immediately rise to $12 per hour. Beginning in 2023, the minimum wage will increase based on the rate of inflation unless the unemployment rate is greater than 8.5 percent. Likewise, paid sick leave benefits will be available to nearly all employees working in the state. Moreover, employer policies will have to allow accrual of paid sick leave at a rate of one hour for every 30 hours worked, up to 72 hours per year, and frontloading will no longer be permitted.
Employers in Michigan should review their existing wage rates and sick leave policies and begin planning for compliance with original form of these ballot initiatives.
Benesch will continue to monitor the situation as the appeals process unfolds. For more information, please contact a member of Benesch’s Labor & Employment Practice Group.
Adam Primm at aprimm@beneschlaw.com or 216.363.4451.
Latest News
U.S. Trade Fraud Task Force Surpasses $1 Billion in Recoveries, Signaling Heightened Customs Enforcement
The Department of Justice (DOJ) announced a new inter-agency Trade Fraud Task Force (“Task Force”), designed to “aggressively pursue enforcement actions against any parties who seek to evade tariffs and other duties” and those who attempt to import prohibited goods following the DOJ’s identification of trade and customs fraud as a priority for prosecution.
Major Shift in Federal Labor Board’s Position on Restrictive Covenants
Non-compete agreements are no longer considered presumptively illegal under federal labor law. On June 26, 2026, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) released advice memoranda signaling this dramatic change in how the federal government views non-compete agreements in the workplace. This is welcome news for employers who use non-competes and similar restrictive covenants to protect their businesses.
Course of Performance as Contract Amendment or Waiver: When Business Practices Overrides Paper Terms
Imagine you are a leading manufacturing company, and you purchase a critical widget from a supplier. You have a carefully negotiated contract in place—one that spells out specific pricing, delivery timelines, and product specifications for those widgets.
California AG’s Carbon Health Settlement Raises the Stakes for MSO-PC Structures and Continuity Planning in California
The California Attorney General’s June 2026 settlement with Carbon Health marks the first-of-its kind resolution of an enforcement action directly targeting an MSO-PC structure under California’s corporate practice of medicine (“CPOM”) doctrine.