Client Alerts & Insights
Reciprocal Tariff Comment Period – One Week Remains to Submit
March 4, 2025
Authored By:
One week remains for clients to submit comments in response to review of potential reciprocal tariffs being conducted by the U.S. Trade Representative (“USTR”). Comments are due by March 11, 2025. The USTR solicited comments from the public on global unfair trade practices in a Federal Register notice published February 25, 2025 (90 FR 10677). The review follows the White House’s Memorandum on Reciprocal Trade and Tariffs published on February 13, 2025.
The USTR will review comments and identify unfair trade practices and recommend appropriate actions to address those practices. The review will result in delivery of a report to the President which is anticipated by April 1, 2025. Reciprocal tariffs are expected to be announced shortly afterward. Additional remedies for unfair trade practice may follow.
Public comment is intended to assist in identifying any unfair foreign practices that are harmful to domestic interests. Examples of potentially unfair trade practices include any foreign policies that harm the U.S., any barriers to U.S. production or exports, and any failure to address non-market policies. The Memorandum specifically calls for examination of:
- Tariffs imposed on U.S. products;
- Unfair, discriminatory, or extraterritorial taxes imposed by trading partners on U.S. businesses, workers, and consumers, including a value-added tax;
- Costs to U.S. businesses, workers, and consumers arising from non-tariff barriers or measures and unfair or harmful acts, policies, or practices, including subsidies, and burdensome regulatory requirements on U.S. businesses operating in other countries;
- Policies and practices that cause exchange rates to deviate from market value to the detriment of Americans; wage suppression; and other mercantilist policies that make U.S. businesses and workers less competitive; and
- Any other practice that imposes any unfair limitation on market access or any structural impediment to fair competition with the market economy of the U.S.
Comments must include the foreign country involved, a description of the practice of concern, an explanation of the operation of the practice or arrangement, and a quantifiable explanation of the domestic U.S. impact. The USTR will focus on submissions related to countries with the largest trade economies and those with the largest trade deficits in goods with the U.S., including Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, the E.U., India, Indonesia, Japan, Korea, Malaysia, Mexico, Russia, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, Switzerland, Taiwan, Thailand, Turkey, the U.K., and Vietnam.
Parties wishing to submit comment may do so through the USTR online portal at https://comments.ustr.gov/s/. Alternative methods to submit are also available. The docket number for this solicitation is USTR-2025-0001.
The Benesch Team assists clients in navigating customs-related changes and all manner of resulting supply chain implications. Our most recent bulletins on preparing for the Trump Administration’s trade policy and other tariff implementation initiatives are available below. You can sign up for our bulletins and client alerts on supply chain, international trade, and global transportation & logistics matters here.
Trump Tariffs – 2025 Expectations, Facts, and Options
UPDATE: Trump Tariffs on Mexico, Canada, China – Supply Chain Impact and Strategies
Steel and Aluminum Tariffs – Impact and Timeline of President Trump’s Proclamation
Jonathan Todd is Vice Chair of the Transportation & Logistics Practice Group at Benesch Law. He may be reached at 216.363.4658 or jtodd@beneschlaw.com.
Megan K. MacCallum is an Associate in the Transportation & Logistics Practice Group at Benesch Law. She may be reached at 216.363.4185 or mmaccallum@beneschlaw.com.
Latest News
Customs Duty Assists: Regulatory Compliance Overview and FAQ
Customs compliance and enforcement defense are high-profile exercises within U.S.-based importers due to the higher-risk regulatory enforcement environment. One of the more complex hot topics facing compliance and legal professionals within importers of record (IORs) is the degree to which “assists” impact dutiable value, and therefore duty burden, in the eyes of U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP).
TSA Authorized Representatives—Emerging Practice of Engaging Freight Brokers and Its Practical Implications
Air transportation safety has long been of critical supply chain importance and geopolitical significance, and that role is growing. Supply chain constraints over this decade have driven a need for adaptation, modal diversification and cost containment. To do so, authorized air cargo providers have increasingly explored new ways to add capacity for regulated surface transportation.
Chameleon Carriers—FMCSA’s “Reincarnated” Rule and Enforcement
As the U.S. DOT and its FMCSA ramp up certain elements of domestic enforcement, regulators are utilizing existing laws and regulations that previously were not often invoked. Enforcement of the English language proficiency requirement is one great example.
What’s Old Is New Again: Broker Liability Insulation from the Case Law in the Post-Montgomery Era
The Supreme Court has spoken in its Montgomery v. Caribe Transport decision, and the brokerage sector, and even shipper and motor carriers, are working toward adapting to this “new liability regime.”