Client Alerts & Insights
Teamsters Test the Bounds of the NLRB’s Cemex Decision, Seeking to Unionize Amazon Workers Without an Election
November 8, 2024
Authored By:
On October 23, 2024, Teamsters Amazon National Negotiating Committee (“Teamsters”) filed an unfair labor practice charge (“ULP”) with the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) alleging that, within the past six months, Amazon has failed and refused to negotiate with the union upon request or to promptly file an RM Petition with the NLRB after a majority of workers at the company’s San Fransisco warehouse signed authorization cards. The filing of the ULP marks Teamsters first step in testing the NLRB’s 2023 Cemex decision which, among other things, gave unions the power to organize a workforce without holding a formal election.
In Cemex Construction Materials Pacific, LLC, the NLRB established a new framework for evaluating employers’ statutory obligations when faced with a union’s claim to represent its employees. In doing so, the Board held that an employer violates the National Labor Relations Act (“NLRA”) by refusing to recognize a union demonstrating support by a majority of employees in an appropriate unit unless the employer promptly files an RM Petition to lawfully test the union’s majority support. An employer who neither seeks an election to contest the union’s alleged majority support nor voluntarily recognizes the union within two weeks of receiving a demand for recognition potentially subjects itself to a NLRB-issued bargaining order requiring the employer to negotiate with the union without an election.
Teamsters allege that Amazon’s failure to voluntarily recognize the union or timely file an RM Petition warrants the issuance of a bargaining order requiring Amazon to bargain with the union. Although the procedure employed by Teamsters permits the union to bypass procedural steps in order to quickly gain recognition and begin bargaining, Amazon’s willingness to litigate in order to prevent the organization of its facilities makes it unlikely that Teamsters will be at the bargaining table anytime soon. In fact, less than a month before Teamsters filed their ULP, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals issued a stay halting NLRB proceedings against Amazon for its apparent refusal to bargain with workers at its Staten Island, New York Facility who voted to unionize 2022, based on Amazon’s constitutional challenges to the NLRB’s structure. Amazon may either launch similar constitutional challenges to halt bargaining at its San Fransisco warehouse or separately test the Cemex framework in federal court. Either way, it is incredibly unlikely that Teamsters will have a contract with Amazon in the near future.
As employers continue to monitor these developments, they should keep in mind that the outcome of the 2024 presidential election will likely result in seismic shifts in many areas of labor law. With a Republican controlled Senate and President-elect Donald Trump’s ability to appoint new Board members and General Counsel in the coming years, it is likely that we will not only see a dismantling of the Cemex framework, but also the rejection of other union-friendly precedent established during the Biden Administration.
For more information, please contact a member of Benesch’s Labor & Employment Practice Group.
Eric Baisden at ebaisden@beneschlaw.com or 216.363.4676.
Adam Primm at aprimm@beneschlaw.com or 216.363.4451.
Latest News
The Coming State-Law Litigation Wave of 2026-27: “Subscription Trap” Class Actions
The subscription economy keeps growing—and so does the wave of class-action litigation targeting it. While the FTC’s regulatory efforts have drawn headlines, private class actions under state laws pose an even greater exposure risk.
Updates to Fees and Grace Periods for Nonimmigrant Visas
Starting September 9, 2026, the 9-11 Response Biometric Entry-Exit Fee will apply to H-1B and L-1 extension petitions filed by employers subject to the fee. Prior to the new rule, the fee was only required for (1) initial grant of status to a foreign national seeking H-1B or L-1 status and (2) a change of employer in the same status.
Third Circuit Decision Reshapes Creditor Standing in Successor Liability Disputes
The Third Circuit recently held that when determining whether a successor liability claim belongs to a bankruptcy estate, the key question is whether the claim seeks to remedy harm suffered by all creditors collectively or a unique injury suffered by a specific creditor. The fact that creditors may be permitted to bring the claim outside of bankruptcy is not, by itself, determinative.
CMS Proposes Sweeping Restrictions on Remote Patient Monitoring: The Outsourcing Ban, Reimbursement Revaluation and Potential Code Consolidation in the CY 2027 Physician Fee Schedule Proposed Rule
CMS’s CY 2027 Proposed Rule would significantly restrict Medicare reimbursement for Remote Patient Monitoring (RPM) and Remote Therapeutic Monitoring (RTM), including banning outsourced clinical staffing, adding new patient-relationship and initiating-visit requirements, reducing certain reimbursement rates, and exploring consolidation of existing billing codes.