Client Alerts & Insights
Benesch COVID-19 Resource Center: Recovery Rebates Not Countable for Public Assistance Purposes
March 31, 2020
Authored By:
As has been widely publicized, the CARE Act includes a provision for one time payments, referred to as “recovery rebates”, of up to $1200 for some taxpayers and certain non-taxpayers. The amounts will vary depending upon marital status, number of children and annual income as determined by either a taxpayer’s 2018 or 2019 Adjusted Gross Income (AGI) as found on the taxpayer’s tax return. Persons who have not filed a tax return for either of those years and who are otherwise eligible may file a return to qualify. Recipients of these payments who are also recipients of, or applicants for, federally funded public assistance benefits such as Medicaid and SNAP ( Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program) can receive these payments without fear of losing eligibility for their public assistance benefits. These rebate payments do not count as income or resources for a 12-month period in determining eligibility for, or the amount of assistance provided by, any federally funded public benefit program. In addition, these payments are not taxable. This is good news for the those on Medicaid benefits and for their providers.
For further information about the rebates and who qualifies, see the Congressional Research Service Report here.
If you have any questions regarding the content above, please contact a member of your Benesch team.
Martha J. Sweterlitsch at msweterlitsch@beneschlaw.com or 614.223.9367.
Jessica N. Angney at jangney@beneschlaw.com or 216.363.4620.
***
Please note that this information is current as of the date of this client bulletin, based on the available data. However, because COVID-19’s status and updates related to the same are ongoing, we recommend real-time review of guidance distributed by CDC and local officials.

Latest News
Back To Wright Line: NLRB Resets Standards for Workplace Misconduct
Employers have regained greater flexibility to address offensive or abusive employee conduct that occurs during union activity or other activity protected by the National Labor Relations Act. On September 23, 2026, the National Labor Relations Board (the “Board”) issued a significant decision in Lion Elastomers LLC, 375 NLRB No. 41, restoring the prior standard for evaluating discipline when employee misconduct occurs during protected concerted activity from General Motors LLC, 369 NLRB No. 127.
Can an Algorithm Commit a Tort? The Circuit Split Over Section 230
A growing circuit split is reshaping the scope of Section 230 immunity. While the Fourth and Ninth Circuits continue to view algorithmic recommendations as protected publisher conduct, the Third Circuit has taken a narrower approach, holding that certain algorithm-driven content recommendations may constitute a platform’s own conduct and therefore fall outside Section 230’s protections.
Key Considerations for Businesses facing Defamation Issues: Strategies for Protecting Your Reputation and Brand
Defamation risk for businesses has never been higher. Even five years ago, unfavorable press could be expected to fade from …
SDNY Bankruptcy Court Offers Further Direction on Default Interest and Fee Recovery
The SDNY Bankruptcy Court’s written decision in 1300 Desert Willow builds on the framework established in Mako, providing additional guidance on when a debtor can overcome the presumption that an oversecured creditor is entitled to post-petition default interest at the contractual rate.