Client Alerts & Insights
Benesch Healthcare+ Nephrology & Dialysis Conference Panel Key Take Aways – Value Based Care: Operationalizing Your VBC Organization to Ensure Success
June 26, 2023
Authored By:
The shift in health care from a retrospective fee for service (“FFS”) model to a value based care (“VBC”) model is growing across our nation’s health system and different specialties, including nephrology. VBC models in kidney care shifts the focus toward chronic kidney disease, enhancing population health management capabilities, improving quality measurement, and leveraging programs to advance health equity. Despite great success, its growth has been met with numerous operational challenges.
At the Benesch’s Healthcare + Third Annual Nephrology and Dialysis Conference, held in Chicago on June 15, 2023, we spoke to a panel of experts ranging from clinicians to healthcare financial experts about the obstacles VBC models present and the best practices to ensure its success.
Experts included Syed Akhtar, M.D., Chief Clinical Officer for Strive Health, Kelly Conroy, Principal at Pinnacle Healthcare Consulting, Stanley Crittenden, MD, Chief Medical Officer for Evergreen Nephrology Mary Dittrich, M.D., Chief Medical Officer for U.S. Renal Care, and Terry Ketchersid, Senior Vice President at Interwell Health.
Key takeaway points from the panel discussion:
- Participants in VBC models are experiencing significant change management issues in their shift from FFS to VBC model participation. This new reimbursement model calls on physicians to expand their scope of practice, assessing not only their field of medicine but other comorbidities as well. This transition from an episodic to continuous care treatment plan poses a serious time and resource challenge and asks physicians to utilize their interdisciplinary team. The main changes that successful physician practices are experiencing are a change in the provider mindset and an adjustment of the communication within the care team, as well as with the patients. Practices that are able to form better communication pathways generally are able to find organic ways to work with all providers in their patients’ care continuum.
- Successful models should incorporate prospective clinical incentive payments to bridge the financial burden on the providers. VBC models offer promising opportunities to improve kidney disease care but also increase the human and financial burden on the providers. Under the VBC models, providers are financially incentivized to implement care delivery interventions such as care management with the goal of reducing total costs of care. Successful models, both governmental and commercial integrate clinical incentive payments for providers, which are necessary as the shift to VBC is the compensation framework of healthcare delivery. Where providers were once receiving payment for a service within a month in the FFS model, they are now generally asked to wait until financial reconciliation of each model’s performance year, which can add months to the expected payment date. With members of the audience explaining their frustration, the panelists explained that the transition is not going to be met without its challenges, but noted numerous models that incorporate prospective payments advance to physicians to bridge this gap. Dr. Akhtar explained that this transition is not going to be an easy one, “It is a journey but be assured we are not going back.”
- Technology poses one of the greatest challenges in the transition to value-based care. Value-based care trends are having a significant impact on the technology decisions made by provider organizations and creating an environment that supports high quality coordinated care. Technology affects how data is conceptualized, collected, and analyzed by physician practices participating in VBC models. The panel stressed the importance of utilizing technology tools that help physicians effectively use EHRs and improve quality measures and claims reporting for their payors. Successful practices are embracing technology which normalizes data, supplies analytics to providers, and helps providers in the VBC models understand their data and find actionable information. Nephrologists and nephrology practices across the country are also asking for better communication tools that would assist in making communication with providers of different specialties more seamless, including cardiologists or primary care physicians which whom they are curating treatment plans with. Without easier access to other providers’ notes, it is difficult for each physician to track the progress of individual patients’ care plan and treatment. Panelists explained that most of their physician partners expect their future resource investments to include investment in predictive analytics, population health management solutions, and analytics that integrate with other forms of technology and promote interoperability.
- Value based care is the future and it is the health care providers responsibility to ensure its success. The panelists finalized the discussion by calling on the audience to be advocates for their patients and their practices. Kelly Conroy emphasized that nephrologists and other specialty physicians need to “own the fact that value-based care is here to stay, and we need to prepare for it”. There is no greater source of the challenges value-based care is posing than the providers interacting with it every day. Therefore, physicians should reach out to the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services and their commercial payors to help define what value-based care means and the best modes of practice. By doing so, the challenges accompanying the transition to this new mode of reimbursement can be mitigated, so that VBC models can be utilized to their full potential.
For more information regarding our nephrology, dialysis and office-based lab experience, please contact:
Nesko Radovic at nradovic@beneschlaw.com or 312.506.3421.
Jason Greis at jgreis@beneschlaw.com or 312.624.6412.
Scott P. Downing at sdowning@beneschlaw.com or 312.624.6326.
Jake A. Cilek at jcilek@beneschlaw.com or 312.624.6363.
Natalie Haddad at nhaddad@beneschlaw.com or 614.223.9346.
Latest News
Ohio Board of Professional Conduct Issues Ohio Ethics Guide on Artificial Intelligence for Lawyers and Judicial Officers
Dispensary tip practices—especially involving hybrid roles like “Leads” or Agents-in-Charge—are increasingly being scrutinized as unlawful as a surge in wage-and-hour lawsuits claim that managers or employees with supervisory duties are improperly sharing in tips meant for front-line staff.
State AGs are Busy Bees: Benesch Continues to Monitor the Implications of Recent State AG Actions
State attorneys general are ramping up enforcement and guidance across a wide range of issues—from consumer protection and pricing transparency to AI use, data privacy and environmental harms—stepping in to fill perceived federal gaps.
Connecticut Broadens Data Privacy Act Requirements Effective July 1, 2026
Key Takeaways Revised Applicability Scope and Exemptions Effective July 1, 2026, the CTDPA’s existing applicability thresholds are reduced, resulting in …
SCOTUS Extends FAA Exemption to Last-Mile Drivers: What the Flowers Foods decision means for motor carriers and transportation providers
On May 28, 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a unanimous decision in Flowers Foods, Inc. v. Brock, expanding reach of the Federal Arbitration Act’s (“FAA”) Section 1 exemption for transportation workers engaged in interstate commerce. The Court held that a worker who transports goods on an intrastate leg of an interstate journey can qualify for Section 1’s exemption without crossing state lines or interacting with vehicles that do. This decision has significant implications for motor carriers and transportation providers that rely on arbitration agreements to resolve disputes with independent contractors and employee drivers.