Client Alerts & Insights
Brexit’s Effect of Intellectual Property Rights
July 5, 2016
Authored By:
Now that the United Kingdom has voted to withdraw from the European Union (commonly known as “Brexit”), we turn to the question of how Brexit will affect intellectual property rights in the UK and Europe.
The good news is that in the short term Brexit will have no impact or effect on intellectual property laws and practices in the UK or Europe. The UK has yet to invoke “Article 50” of the Lisbon Treaty, which triggers a two-year negotiation period for the UK to formally withdraw from the European Union. Therefore, any changes due to Brexit are at least two years away.
Patent Law and Practice
The traditional European patent system is based on the European Patent Convention, which is an independent convention and not part of the European Union. Therefore, traditional patent filings and prosecution in both the European Patent Office and the UK Intellectual Property Office will not be affected in the short term or long term by Brexit. Past and future patent applications prosecuted and granted through the European Patent Office will be valid and enforceable in the UK through the current national validation process.
However, the new Unitary Patent system and Unitary Patent Court will likely be delayed by Brexit. The Unitary Patent system is created through European Union regulations. Therefore, upon the UK’s withdrawal from the European Union, it will no longer be eligible to participate in the system. To complicate matters further, a requirement to formally institute the Unitary Patent Court is for the three European Union member states with the most patents in force (which currently includes the UK) must ratify the agreement that establishes the court. For at least the next two years, the institution of the Unitary Patent Court relies on UK ratification of a system that it will not ultimately participate in. Therefore, it is very unlikely that the UK will ratify the agreement. The status of the Unitary Patent system will remain in doubt until after the formal withdrawal of the UK from the European Union or the renegotiation by member states of agreements relevant to the Unitary Patent system.
Trademark Law and Practice
Trademarks granted by the European Union Intellectual Property Office will remain valid and enforceable in the UK until its withdrawal from the European Union. Prior to the formal withdrawal of the UK from the European Union, it is highly likely that the UK will pass legislation to create mechanisms for validating the effect of European Union trademarks in the UK through a conversion process. As the ultimate withdrawal date becomes known, companies should reevaluate European trademark strategies to include selectively pursuing UK trademarks in addition to European Union trademarks.
Further Information
If you have any questions on this topic please contact a member of Benesch’s Innovations, Information Technology & Intellectual Property (3iP) Practice Group.
Latest News
Judicial Green Light: Court Upholds NLRB’s Cemex Decision
On April 21st, 2026, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit upheld the National Labor Relations Board’s (“NLRB”) decision in Cemex Construction Materials Pacific, LLC., reinforcing a significant shift in federal labor law governing union recognition and employer conduct during organizing campaigns.
The LEAD Model—Kidney Care’s Value-Based Care Journey LEADs Here
The new LEAD Model, launching in 2027, is CMS’s next-generation value-based care framework for kidney care, integrating CKD and ESRD patients into standard ACOs with a 10-year benchmark period, new payment options and greater flexibility for nephrology-led organizations.
DOL Proposes Universal Guidance Meant to Simplify Joint Employer Analysis
On April 22, 2026, the Department of Labor’s Wage and Hour Division proposed a new rule to clarify joint employer status and the related analysis under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), Family Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”), and the Migrant and Seasonal Agricultural Protection Act (“MSAPA”).
Only the Strong Survive: Easy Pitfalls to Avoid as a Defamation Plaintiff
Filing a defamation lawsuit is one thing. Surviving the inevitable motion to dismiss is another. A recent case out of the Eastern District of North Carolina, McKnight v. FOXY/WFXC/K 107.1/104.3 Radio Station, et al., Civil Action No. 5:26-cv-102, provides a useful case study in the kinds of missteps that can doom a defamation complaint before it ever reaches discovery.