Client Alerts & Insights
Brexit’s Effect of Intellectual Property Rights
July 5, 2016
Authored By:
Now that the United Kingdom has voted to withdraw from the European Union (commonly known as “Brexit”), we turn to the question of how Brexit will affect intellectual property rights in the UK and Europe.
The good news is that in the short term Brexit will have no impact or effect on intellectual property laws and practices in the UK or Europe. The UK has yet to invoke “Article 50” of the Lisbon Treaty, which triggers a two-year negotiation period for the UK to formally withdraw from the European Union. Therefore, any changes due to Brexit are at least two years away.
Patent Law and Practice
The traditional European patent system is based on the European Patent Convention, which is an independent convention and not part of the European Union. Therefore, traditional patent filings and prosecution in both the European Patent Office and the UK Intellectual Property Office will not be affected in the short term or long term by Brexit. Past and future patent applications prosecuted and granted through the European Patent Office will be valid and enforceable in the UK through the current national validation process.
However, the new Unitary Patent system and Unitary Patent Court will likely be delayed by Brexit. The Unitary Patent system is created through European Union regulations. Therefore, upon the UK’s withdrawal from the European Union, it will no longer be eligible to participate in the system. To complicate matters further, a requirement to formally institute the Unitary Patent Court is for the three European Union member states with the most patents in force (which currently includes the UK) must ratify the agreement that establishes the court. For at least the next two years, the institution of the Unitary Patent Court relies on UK ratification of a system that it will not ultimately participate in. Therefore, it is very unlikely that the UK will ratify the agreement. The status of the Unitary Patent system will remain in doubt until after the formal withdrawal of the UK from the European Union or the renegotiation by member states of agreements relevant to the Unitary Patent system.
Trademark Law and Practice
Trademarks granted by the European Union Intellectual Property Office will remain valid and enforceable in the UK until its withdrawal from the European Union. Prior to the formal withdrawal of the UK from the European Union, it is highly likely that the UK will pass legislation to create mechanisms for validating the effect of European Union trademarks in the UK through a conversion process. As the ultimate withdrawal date becomes known, companies should reevaluate European trademark strategies to include selectively pursuing UK trademarks in addition to European Union trademarks.
Further Information
If you have any questions on this topic please contact a member of Benesch’s Innovations, Information Technology & Intellectual Property (3iP) Practice Group.
Latest News
The Coming State-Law Litigation Wave of 2026-27: “Subscription Trap” Class Actions
The subscription economy keeps growing—and so does the wave of class-action litigation targeting it. While the FTC’s regulatory efforts have drawn headlines, private class actions under state laws pose an even greater exposure risk.
Updates to Fees and Grace Periods for Nonimmigrant Visas
Starting September 9, 2026, the 9-11 Response Biometric Entry-Exit Fee will apply to H-1B and L-1 extension petitions filed by employers subject to the fee. Prior to the new rule, the fee was only required for (1) initial grant of status to a foreign national seeking H-1B or L-1 status and (2) a change of employer in the same status.
Third Circuit Decision Reshapes Creditor Standing in Successor Liability Disputes
The Third Circuit recently held that when determining whether a successor liability claim belongs to a bankruptcy estate, the key question is whether the claim seeks to remedy harm suffered by all creditors collectively or a unique injury suffered by a specific creditor. The fact that creditors may be permitted to bring the claim outside of bankruptcy is not, by itself, determinative.
CMS Proposes Sweeping Restrictions on Remote Patient Monitoring: The Outsourcing Ban, Reimbursement Revaluation and Potential Code Consolidation in the CY 2027 Physician Fee Schedule Proposed Rule
CMS’s CY 2027 Proposed Rule would significantly restrict Medicare reimbursement for Remote Patient Monitoring (RPM) and Remote Therapeutic Monitoring (RTM), including banning outsourced clinical staffing, adding new patient-relationship and initiating-visit requirements, reducing certain reimbursement rates, and exploring consolidation of existing billing codes.