Client Alerts & Insights
Business Buyers Beware! Workers’ Compensation Successorship Rule is Changing
August 15, 2006
In April 2006, the Ohio Bureau of Workers’ Compensation (“BWC”) amended its rule concerning successor liability.The BWC amended this rule as a way to recover lost revenue after business transfers occur.Up to this point, the BWC was generally unsuccessful in assessing a predecessor’s outstanding obligations—like premiums in default, retrospective rating obligations, non compliance claims billings, and VSSR (Violation of Specific Safety Requirements) penalties—against an employer’s successor, absent an agreement between the predecessor and successor.The amended rule will give the BWC the ability to assess financial responsibility on many business successors after September 1, 2006.
The amended rule will permit the BWC to transfer all of a predecessor’s rights and obligations under the workers’ compensation law to its successor whenever the successor wholly succeeds the predecessor.The amended rule makes it more likely that the BWC will be paid all of the predecessor’s debts and unpaid obligations in most business reorganizations and in many asset sales.Previously, the transfer of a predecessor’s risk account and financial liabilities became effective only upon the written agreement of the predecessor and successor.
With the new rule, all successors must inform BWC of their succession.Employers wholly succeeding a predecessor become obligated to pay the predecessor’s obligations as a matter of law.Predecessors that do not transfer all of their operations retain their financial obligations to the BWC.Unlike the rules concerning successorship for unemployment compensation, the BWC’s rules are not detailed, and we will have to wait to see how the BWC determines the breadth of the term “wholly succeeding.”
Because this is a significant departure from previous practice, business purchasers should thoroughly investigate the workers’ compensation liabilities of the business being purchased.The purchase documents should contemplate that the seller’s final premium payment and perhaps other payments will not be due until after the transfer takes effect.
If you have any questions regarding the amended rule, or about its impact on your business, please contact Joseph N. Gross at 216.363.4163 or jgross@bfca.com. You can review the rule at:http://www.registerofohio.state.oh.us/pdfs/4123/0/17/4123-17-02_PH_FF_A_RU_20060717_1210.pdf.
Latest News
Updates to Fees and Grace Periods for Nonimmigrant Visas
Starting September 9, 2026, the 9-11 Response Biometric Entry-Exit Fee will apply to H-1B and L-1 extension petitions filed by employers subject to the fee. Prior to the new rule, the fee was only required for (1) initial grant of status to a foreign national seeking H-1B or L-1 status and (2) a change of employer in the same status.
Third Circuit Decision Reshapes Creditor Standing in Successor Liability Disputes
The Third Circuit recently held that when determining whether a successor liability claim belongs to a bankruptcy estate, the key question is whether the claim seeks to remedy harm suffered by all creditors collectively or a unique injury suffered by a specific creditor. The fact that creditors may be permitted to bring the claim outside of bankruptcy is not, by itself, determinative.
CMS Proposes Sweeping Restrictions on Remote Patient Monitoring: The Outsourcing Ban, Reimbursement Revaluation and Potential Code Consolidation in the CY 2027 Physician Fee Schedule Proposed Rule
CMS’s CY 2027 Proposed Rule would significantly restrict Medicare reimbursement for Remote Patient Monitoring (RPM) and Remote Therapeutic Monitoring (RTM), including banning outsourced clinical staffing, adding new patient-relationship and initiating-visit requirements, reducing certain reimbursement rates, and exploring consolidation of existing billing codes.
Canada Trade – New Tariff Announcement and USMCA Non-Renewable Stakes for North American Supply Chains
On July 20, 2026, the Trump Administration announced a new set of sweeping tariffs on Canadian goods. This comes less than one month after the United States decided against renewing the free trade agreement between the United States of America, Mexico, and Canada (the “USMCA”) during the required six-year joint review.