Client Alerts & Insights
CCPA Applicability Cheat Sheet (and a Special Note for Nonprofits)
December 18, 2019
Authored By:
It’s that time. The December 6, 2019, deadline to submit comments on the proposed California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) regulations has come and gone and the CCPA will go into effect in 14 days. Submitted comments—1,726 pages in total—are available for our (and your) reading enjoyment on the California Attorney General’s website.[1]
Across the country and the rest of the world, organizations are in various stages of preparing for the impending go-live of the CCPA. For those who are closer to the starting line than they may realize (or want to admit), Benesch Law has prepared a CCPA Applicability Cheat Sheet to help guide organizations through and around that threshold question: Does the CCPA apply to me?
But wait. Asking whether or not the CCPA “applies” to a given person or entity runs the risk of oversimplifying the CCPA and the respective reaches of the law’s various arms and legs. The nature of the CCPA’s applicability depends on your role—Business? Service provider? Individual resident? Data point? So, in the name of precision, how about this: Am I a “business” under the CCPA and therefore subject to the CCPA’s notice, disclosure, deletion, and related obligations?
Nonprofit organizations should carefully review the second of the two ways in which an entity can be a “business” under the CCPA. If a nonprofit shares common branding with a for-profit entity that is subject to the CCPA and the nonprofit either controls or is controlled by that for-profit entity, the nonprofit will be pulled into the CCPA as a result of that relationship.
Service providers of nonprofits should also take note: under the draft CCPA regulations (emphasis on draft), if you provide services to an entity that does not qualify as a “business” but you otherwise meet the definition of “service provider,” you will be considered a “service provider” of that entity under the CCPA.
Take a look at our cheat sheet to get this conversation started and to explore the scope of “personal information” covered by the CCPA.
[1] https://oag.ca.gov/privacy/ccpa
For more information, contact a member of the firm’s Intellectual Property/3iP Practice Group.
Michael D. Stovsky at mstovsky@beneschlaw.com or 216.363.4626.
Alison K. Evans at aevans@beneschlaw.com or 216.363.4168.
Kristopher J. Chandler at kchandler@beneschlaw.com or 614.223.9377.
Latest News
From Citation to Criminal Case: AB 2321 Expands Cal/OSHA’s Criminal Enforcement and Penalizes Inspection Interference
Key Takeaways: Taking effect January 1, 2027, AB 2321 expands the reach of the BOI, the criminal investigation unit within …
EEOC Rescinds Criminal History Guidance
Key Takeaways By a 2-1 vote held on October 29, 2026, the EEOC rescinded its 2012 enforcement guidance on the …
Election 2026 Reshapes the State Attorney General Landscape: What Companies Should Expect
The 2026 elections have materially shifted the state AG enforcement landscape. Democratic flips in Texas, Ohio, Georgia, Kansas and Iowa expand the geographic reach and potential leverage of Democratic-led multistate coalitions, while potentially changing enforcement priorities in several major commercial markets.
D.C. Circuit Rejects DOE’s Use of Emergency Authority to Prevent Coal Plant Retirement
The D.C. Circuit vacated the Department of Energy’s order compelling continued operation of Michigan’s J.H. Campbell coal plant under DOE’s emergency authority, finding that Section 202(c) is a narrow, last-resort power reserved for immediate grid-reliability emergencies, not longer-term resource planning.