Client Alerts & Insights
CCPA: Proposed Amendments May Lead to Increased Headache for Businesses
April 10, 2019
Authored By:
California’s data protection law is set to go into effect in early 2020, and California lawmakers continue to propose significant amendments that would substantively change material provisions of the law, including provisions that limit consumers’ ability to take legal action against companies who violate the law.
For instance, Assemblymember Buffy Wicks is sponsoring AB 1790, a measure that would allow consumers to sue companies that violate the law and would require companies to reveal the information they collect, how they use it and to whom they sell it. The measure would also require companies to obtain opt-in consent from consumers before sharing or selling the consumers’ data.
Sen. Hannah-Beth Jackson and state attorney general Xavier Becerra introduced SB 561, which would remove a provision of the law that allows companies to avoid litigation if they fail to notify consumers of data breaches within 30 days, and Republication law makers introduced AB 1035, AB 1138, and AB 288 that would respectively require companies to provide notice of data breaches within 72 hours; obtain parental consent before allowing children under the age of 16 to obtain social media accounts; and permanently scrub personal information from social media databases if requested by users who close their accounts.
In what might be the most significant potential change to the CCPA, Gov. Gavin Newsom indicated in his State of the State address in February that he would be introducing a proposal that would require companies to pay consumers for the use of their data.
But data privacy experts question whether this requirement would actually compromise consumers’ rights to their data because consumers would have no choice but to allow companies to use their information. Moreover, it is unclear how lawmakers would determine the value of the data and how consumers would be compensated. For instance, would companies provide direct payments or discounts to consumers, or should the government impose a tax on companies’ use of the data and develop a way of returning those dollars to consumers?
With at least 25 states considering consumer data privacy legislation this year, how California lawmakers resolve the issues presented by each proposed amendment to the CCPA will certainly impact lawmakers nationwide.
As the CCPA and other data privacy legislation is adopted and amended, the Benesch Data Security and Privacy team is committed to staying at the forefront of knowledge and experience to assist our clients in complying with legal obligations. We are available to assist you with any compliance efforts. You may reach Michael Stovsky at 216-363-4626 or mstovsky@beneschlaw.com and Alison Evans at 216-363-4168 or aevans@beneschlaw.com.
Latest News
Back To Wright Line: NLRB Resets Standards for Workplace Misconduct
Employers have regained greater flexibility to address offensive or abusive employee conduct that occurs during union activity or other activity protected by the National Labor Relations Act. On September 23, 2026, the National Labor Relations Board (the “Board”) issued a significant decision in Lion Elastomers LLC, 375 NLRB No. 41, restoring the prior standard for evaluating discipline when employee misconduct occurs during protected concerted activity from General Motors LLC, 369 NLRB No. 127.
Can an Algorithm Commit a Tort? The Circuit Split Over Section 230
A growing circuit split is reshaping the scope of Section 230 immunity. While the Fourth and Ninth Circuits continue to view algorithmic recommendations as protected publisher conduct, the Third Circuit has taken a narrower approach, holding that certain algorithm-driven content recommendations may constitute a platform’s own conduct and therefore fall outside Section 230’s protections.
Key Considerations for Businesses facing Defamation Issues: Strategies for Protecting Your Reputation and Brand
Defamation risk for businesses has never been higher. Even five years ago, unfavorable press could be expected to fade from …
SDNY Bankruptcy Court Offers Further Direction on Default Interest and Fee Recovery
The SDNY Bankruptcy Court’s written decision in 1300 Desert Willow builds on the framework established in Mako, providing additional guidance on when a debtor can overcome the presumption that an oversecured creditor is entitled to post-petition default interest at the contractual rate.