Client Alerts & Insights
Closed-loop Payment System Proposed for Ohio Medical Marijuana Program
February 9, 2018
Authored By:
Two identical bills (“Bills”), H.B. 495 and S.B. 254, were introduced in the past week by Representative Seitz and Senator Terhar that would require medical marijuana entities (cultivator, processors, dispensaries, and testing laboratories), patients, and caregivers to use a designated financial institution for virtually all transactions. Importantly, the Bills require the Department of Commerce to ensure that entities, patients, and caregivers have access to a financial institution, a challenge in many jurisdictions in which marijuana is either medically or recreationally permitted under state law, but it also grants the authorized financial institution a de facto monopoly over banking activities in Ohio for all marijuana related transactions. Under existing law, the director of commerce is permitted, but not required, to adopt rules to establish a closed loop payment system.
If it becomes law, the Bills amend Ohio Revised Code 3796.031 by mandating the use of a cashless closed loop payment processing system to “monitor and facilitate the financial transactions of medical marijuana entities and registered patients and their caregivers and the financial transactions between medical marijuana entities and their employees, independent contractors, sellers of goods and services, and other medical marijuana entities.”[1]
As set forth in the Bills, the system shall: (1) establish the means for entities/patients/caregivers to activate accounts; (2) require entities to deposit money other than money directly generated from the sale of marijuana into an authorized financial institution and use the system card for all transactions described in the Bills; (3) require that patients/caregivers deposit money into an authorized financial institution and use the closed loop card to purchase marijuana products; (4) require all “financial transactions” between entities, patients, and caregivers and their employees, contractors, and providers of goods and services be conducted via the system.[2]
“Financial transactions” include the following: 1) purchases of marijuana products at retail dispensaries; 2) payroll; and 3) payment for goods and services acquired by marijuana entities.[3]
Under Ohio law, the medical marijuana program is scheduled to be fully operational by September 8, 2018.[4] The Bills were introduced in the past week and will be referred to their respective committees for hearings. With a limited session schedule and looming operational date, action on the Bills should be swift.
For more information on this topic, please contact:
Rachel Winder at rwinder@beneschlaw.com or 614.223.9316.
Latest News
Ohio Governor Appoints Andy Wilson as Attorney General: New Leadership, New Opportunities
Ohio has a new Attorney General—Andy Wilson—appointed to serve through January 2027, bringing a law enforcement–focused background and signaling continuity in protecting consumers and supporting public safety priorities.
IEEPA Tariff Refunds Challenged in Court – Q&A for Supply Chains
Many of our clients have filed declarations to receive International Emergency Economic Powers Act (“IEEPA”) tariff refunds for “Phase 1” of the new refund process. Some have already received those funds. Recent Department of Justice (“DOJ”) actions between June 2 and June 9, 2026, raise questions about the viability of this administrative process for duty refunds beyond those allowed in Phase 1.
Versata v. Ford: Federal Circuit Reinstates $82M Award and Opens Door to Even Greater Damages
Recently, the Federal Circuit affirmed the Eastern District of Michigan’s ruling that Ford Motor Company (“Ford”) misappropriated Versata Software Inc.’s (“Versata”) trade secrets and breached a software licensing agreement. The three-judge panel ordered a new trial on trade secret damages, finding that the lower court improperly limited available damages theories, and reinstated the jury’s $82.3 million award from Ford’s breach of the software licensing agreement.
UPDATED: The Faster Labor Contracts Act Would Permit Federal Government to Impose Union Contract Terms on Employers
The federal government may soon be able to impose the terms of first collective bargaining agreements (“CBAs”) on private sector employers and unions.