Client Alerts & Insights
Connecticut Attorney General Issues $85,000 Penalty for Deficient Privacy Policies
July 18, 2025
Authored By:
In its first fine for violations of the Connecticut Data Privacy Act (“CDPA”), the state’s omnibus data privacy law, the Connecticut Attorney General (“CT AG”) chose to make an example of deficient privacy notices.
Nearly two years to the effective date of the CDPA, the CT AG issued the first monetary penalty for violations, an $85,000 settlement with TicketNetwork (“TN”), an online event tickets marketplace, for failure to cure privacy notices deficient under the CDPA’s requirements despite the CT AG’s continued outreach since 2023. This serves as a reminder that state-by-state compliance with privacy and other consumer protection laws is the new normal for businesses operating in the U.S.
Similar to other state omnibus data privacy laws enacted in the last decade, the CDPA empowers Connecticut consumers with certain rights to their data (the right to access, correct, and delete personal data stored and collected by businesses as well as the right to opt-out of the sale of personal data and targeted advertising). Generally speaking, the CDPA requires Connecticut businesses that process certain volumes and types of Connecticut consumer data to provide those consumers (specifically through privacy policies and embedded opt-out mechanisms) with the knowledge of and the means by which data rights may be enforced through the business.
TN’s privacy policies did not meet the CDPA’s requirements. According to the CT AG’s statement, the agency flagged TN’s privacy policy as “largely unreadable, missing key data rights, and contained rights mechanisms that were misconfigured or inoperable” in November 2023. By January 1, 2025, when a right to cure expired for violations under the CDPA, TN remained the only business that had not corrected deficiencies identified by the CT AG during the four “privacy notice sweeps” conducted since 2023.
The CT AG’s settlement is a reminder that while compliance with the patchwork of U.S. privacy laws may be costly and cumbersome, the risks and consequences of non-compliance continue to increase as more states enact omnibus data privacy laws and related consumer protections that step in where the federal government has declined or failed to take action. Maintaining a proactive data compliance program that can effectively and timely respond to changes in the law, agency, and consumer complaints is critical.
Latest News
UPDATED: The Faster Labor Contracts Act Would Permit Federal Government to Impose Union Contract Terms on Employers
The federal government may soon be able to impose the terms of first collective bargaining agreements (“CBAs”) on private sector employers and unions.
Tariff Refund Litigation: A Primer on Common Plaintiff’s Theories of Recovery and Importer of Record Defenses
In February 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that President Trump did not have constitutional authority to impose tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). The Trump Administration responded quickly, implementing a universal 10 percent surcharge under the authority of Section 122 of the U.S. Trade Act.
Supreme Court 2025: Key Free Speech Rulings
The Supreme Court’s 2025 decisions signaled a more regulator-friendly view of the internet—upholding laws on age verification and foreign-owned platforms under intermediate scrutiny, even where speech is burdened. These cases reaffirm that content-neutral rules that incidentally affect speech are likely to survive constitutional challenge.
Nobody—Not Even Einstein—Has Figured Out What Causes Gravity, but You Need to if You Are Facing a Putative Consumer Class Action in the 9th Circuit
The common argument made by plaintiffs that differences in alleged misrepresentations are transcended by the center of the gravity of the alleged fraud should not be addressed through the typical approach of just comparing the level of variance of the representations in the case at issue with that in the relevant precedent.