Client Alerts & Insights
Connecticut Attorney General Issues $85,000 Penalty for Deficient Privacy Policies
July 18, 2025
Authored By:
In its first fine for violations of the Connecticut Data Privacy Act (“CDPA”), the state’s omnibus data privacy law, the Connecticut Attorney General (“CT AG”) chose to make an example of deficient privacy notices.
Nearly two years to the effective date of the CDPA, the CT AG issued the first monetary penalty for violations, an $85,000 settlement with TicketNetwork (“TN”), an online event tickets marketplace, for failure to cure privacy notices deficient under the CDPA’s requirements despite the CT AG’s continued outreach since 2023. This serves as a reminder that state-by-state compliance with privacy and other consumer protection laws is the new normal for businesses operating in the U.S.
Similar to other state omnibus data privacy laws enacted in the last decade, the CDPA empowers Connecticut consumers with certain rights to their data (the right to access, correct, and delete personal data stored and collected by businesses as well as the right to opt-out of the sale of personal data and targeted advertising). Generally speaking, the CDPA requires Connecticut businesses that process certain volumes and types of Connecticut consumer data to provide those consumers (specifically through privacy policies and embedded opt-out mechanisms) with the knowledge of and the means by which data rights may be enforced through the business.
TN’s privacy policies did not meet the CDPA’s requirements. According to the CT AG’s statement, the agency flagged TN’s privacy policy as “largely unreadable, missing key data rights, and contained rights mechanisms that were misconfigured or inoperable” in November 2023. By January 1, 2025, when a right to cure expired for violations under the CDPA, TN remained the only business that had not corrected deficiencies identified by the CT AG during the four “privacy notice sweeps” conducted since 2023.
The CT AG’s settlement is a reminder that while compliance with the patchwork of U.S. privacy laws may be costly and cumbersome, the risks and consequences of non-compliance continue to increase as more states enact omnibus data privacy laws and related consumer protections that step in where the federal government has declined or failed to take action. Maintaining a proactive data compliance program that can effectively and timely respond to changes in the law, agency, and consumer complaints is critical.
Latest News
Canada Trade – New Tariff Announcement and USMCA Non-Renewable Stakes for North American Supply Chains
On July 20, 2026, the Trump Administration announced a new set of sweeping tariffs on Canadian goods. This comes less than one month after the United States decided against renewing the free trade agreement between the United States of America, Mexico, and Canada (the “USMCA”) during the required six-year joint review.
Section 301 Duties for Forced Labor – Step 3 in IEEPA Replacement and its Impact
The White House initiated its third step in replacing IEEPA tariffs on Friday, July 24. Specifically, the U.S. Trade Representative (“USTR”) published final Section 301 findings and duty rates for imports from 30 countries following its investigation of harms on the domestic industry due to forced labor in those countries’ supply chains.
New York City’s Protected Time Off Law (PTOL) Final Rules Effective as of July 23, 2026
The New York City Department of Consumer and Worker Protection (DCWP) has adopted final rules implementing the City’s significantly expanded Earned Safe and Sick Time Act (ESSTA), now referred to as the Protected Time Off Law (PTOL).
U.S. Trade Fraud Task Force Surpasses $1 Billion in Recoveries, Signaling Heightened Customs Enforcement
The Department of Justice (DOJ) announced a new inter-agency Trade Fraud Task Force (“Task Force”), designed to “aggressively pursue enforcement actions against any parties who seek to evade tariffs and other duties” and those who attempt to import prohibited goods following the DOJ’s identification of trade and customs fraud as a priority for prosecution.