Client Alerts & Insights
Department of Labor Withdraws Gig Economy Opinion Letter that Supported Independent Contractor Classification
February 22, 2021
Authored By:
On February 19, 2021, the Department of Labor’s Wage and Hour Division withdrew its opinion letter that indicated gig economy workers who offer services in a virtual marketplace are independent contractors. The Wage and Hour Division had previously published this opinion letter, FLSA2019-6, on April 29, 2019. This recent withdrawal is another signal that the Department of Labor under the Biden administration is closely scrutinizing the classification of workers as independent contractors.
The Wage and Hour Division previously published the now-withdrawn opinion letter in response to a request from a “virtual marketplace company” that connects service providers with individuals seeking those services. The withdrawn opinion letter opined that the workers offering services in the virtual marketplace platform “are independent contractors, not employees of [the virtual marketplace platform]” based on the Department of Labor’s long-standing six-factor “economic realities” test to determine the worker’s economic dependence on the entity at issue. The six factors are:
1. The nature and degree of the potential employer’s control.
2. The permanency of the worker’s relationship with the potential employer.
3. The amount of the worker’s investment in facilities, equipment or helpers.
4. The amount of skill, initiative, judgment or foresight required for the worker’s services.
5. The worker’s opportunities for profit or loss.
6. The extent of integration of the worker’s services into the potential employer’s business
The withdrawal of FLSA2019-6 is an “official ruling” of the Wage and Hour Division for purposes of the Portal-to-Portal Act, 29 U.S.C. § 259. Parties may no longer rely on opinion letter FLSA2019-6 as a statement of agency policy as of February 19, 2021. Businesses should note that opinion letters are not legally binding, but parties can present opinion letters in court as persuasive guidance to boost claims or defenses in cases involving similar issues. For the time being, there is no definitive, revised stance from the Wage and Hour Division until it publishes a new opinion letter on the question of classification of gig economy independent contractors.
The withdrawal of this opinion letter follows the Department of Labor’s proposed delay of the effective date of the Trump-era final rule entitled “Independent Contractor Status Under the Fair Labor Standards Act.” The Department of Labor has proposed to delay the effective date of the final rule in order to provide additional time for review and consideration of the rule. In its withdrawal notice posted to opinion letter FLSA2019-6, the Wage and Hour Division noted as follows: “This letter addressed the same issue under consideration by the Department—independent contractor status under the FLSA. Thus, consistent with its proposed delay of the final rule, WHD is withdrawing this opinion letter.”
Benesch is continuing to monitor further developments and will provide future alerts as the Biden-era Department of Labor continues to develop its stance on the proper classification of workers as independent contractors.
For more information on this topic, contact a member of the firm’s Labor & Employment practice group.
Corey Clay at CClay@beneschlaw.com or 216.363.4158.
Adam Primm at APrimm@beneschlaw.com or 216.363.4451.
Jordan J. Call at JCall@beneschlaw.com or 216.363.6169.
Latest News
Connecticut Broadens Data Privacy Act Requirements Effective July 1, 2026
Key Takeaways Revised Applicability Scope and Exemptions Effective July 1, 2026, the CTDPA’s existing applicability thresholds are reduced, resulting in …
SCOTUS Extends FAA Exemption to Last-Mile Drivers: What the Flowers Foods decision means for motor carriers and transportation providers
On May 28, 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a unanimous decision in Flowers Foods, Inc. v. Brock, expanding reach of the Federal Arbitration Act’s (“FAA”) Section 1 exemption for transportation workers engaged in interstate commerce. The Court held that a worker who transports goods on an intrastate leg of an interstate journey can qualify for Section 1’s exemption without crossing state lines or interacting with vehicles that do. This decision has significant implications for motor carriers and transportation providers that rely on arbitration agreements to resolve disputes with independent contractors and employee drivers.
Beyond the Buzzwords: State AGs Put Enforcement Muscle Behind Algorithmic Pricing and Age Verification Crackdowns
State AGs are doubling down—across party lines—on consumer protection, with a sharp focus on vulnerable groups and increased scrutiny of algorithmic pricing models and online age verification practices.
California SB 54 Is Here: What Companies Using Plastic Packaging Need To Do Now
Learn how California’s SB 54 impacts companies using plastic packaging, including key compliance deadlines, producer responsibilities, and steps to reduce risk under new recycling and sustainability regulations.