Client Alerts & Insights
DOL’s New Assessment Procedures for Calculating Civil Monetary Penalties Significantly Increases Liability for Employers.
December 21, 2023
Authored By:
The U.S. Department of Labor recently changed how it assesses civil money penalties against employers for violating federal child labor laws, which could significantly increase fines for hiring underage children to perform dangerous jobs or keeping inaccurate records.
In a memo to regional administrators and district directors, Administrator Jessica Looman said the Wage and Hour Division would no longer fine employers for nonserious injury and noninjury violations on a per child basis and instead issue fines on a per violation basis.
The new per violation assessment has the potential to increase employer penalties significantly. For instance, if there are three separate violations relative to a specific child’s employment—for employing an underage child, for having the child work in a dangerous job prohibited under federal law, and for keeping inaccurate records—the employer could be assessed with three separate penalties, each of which could reach the statutory maximum of $15,138. Under the prior per child basis, the maximum penalty could not exceed $15,138, regardless of the number of violations relative to a child’s unlawful employment. These increased penalties can be adjusted.
In calculating the penalty amount, WHD will apply the statutory maximum of $15,138 and then increase or decrease the amount of the fine based on aggravating or mitigating “gravity” factors and the size of the business. The agency will first look at gravity factors such as the number of minors employed, their ages, the length of their employment, the hours of their employment, whether the work is hazardous, and the number of repeat or willful violations. Once these factors have been considered, the agency will then adjust the fine based on the size of the business, its financial resources, the size of its workforce, and its annual sales. Finally, the agency will consider the size of the business and the gravity of the violation, as well as regulatory factors, to determine the final penalty amount.
In addition, employers can face increased liability under the FLSA, which prohibits the shipment of “hot goods” that were produced in an establishment in or about which oppressive child labor occurred. The previous policy limited the assessments for hot goods cases on a per investigation basis. The new policy calls for a per shipment or delivery for shipment basis.
Under the FLSA, employers also are required to record a birth date for every employee under the age of 19 and retain those records for three years. Notably, the new policy changes the assessment for child labor recordkeeping violations. Recordkeeping violations will now be assessed per employee. For example, if an employer fails to keep records of dates of birth for five of its employees under the age of 19, the agency may assess fines for five separate recordkeeping violations.
If you have any questions on this topic, please contact a member of our Labor & Employment Practice Group.
Margarita Krncevic at mkrncevic@beneschlaw.com or 216.363.6285.
Rick Hepp at rhepp@beneschlaw.com or 216.363.4657.
Alyson Waite at awaite@beneschlaw.com or 216.363.4414.
Latest News
U.S. Trade Fraud Task Force Surpasses $1 Billion in Recoveries, Signaling Heightened Customs Enforcement
The Department of Justice (DOJ) announced a new inter-agency Trade Fraud Task Force (“Task Force”), designed to “aggressively pursue enforcement actions against any parties who seek to evade tariffs and other duties” and those who attempt to import prohibited goods following the DOJ’s identification of trade and customs fraud as a priority for prosecution.
Major Shift in Federal Labor Board’s Position on Restrictive Covenants
Non-compete agreements are no longer considered presumptively illegal under federal labor law. On June 26, 2026, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) released advice memoranda signaling this dramatic change in how the federal government views non-compete agreements in the workplace. This is welcome news for employers who use non-competes and similar restrictive covenants to protect their businesses.
Course of Performance as Contract Amendment or Waiver: When Business Practices Overrides Paper Terms
Imagine you are a leading manufacturing company, and you purchase a critical widget from a supplier. You have a carefully negotiated contract in place—one that spells out specific pricing, delivery timelines, and product specifications for those widgets.
California AG’s Carbon Health Settlement Raises the Stakes for MSO-PC Structures and Continuity Planning in California
The California Attorney General’s June 2026 settlement with Carbon Health marks the first-of-its kind resolution of an enforcement action directly targeting an MSO-PC structure under California’s corporate practice of medicine (“CPOM”) doctrine.