Client Alerts & Insights
EEOC Shakeups Under the Trump Administration Targeting Gender Identity, Abortion Accommodations, and AI Bias
February 21, 2025
Authored By:
The Trump Administration has issued swift changes in policy, and the effects are now reaching the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”). While the EEOC is still awaiting quorum to vote on major actions, it is signaling changes to Biden-era rules related to gender identity, abortion accommodations, and artificial intelligence (“AI”) bias risks.
LGBTQ+ Guidance
On January 20, 2025, President Trump issued an executive order recognizing only “two sexes” and seeking rescission of the 2024 anti-harassment guidance. The Biden-era guidance, which is still in effect, provides that employers are prohibited from misgendering employees or barring them from using bathrooms that align with their gender identity.
Following President Trump’s order, EEOC Acting Chair, Andrea Lucas, directed that all impacted EEOC charges be elevated for review at the Commission’s headquarters. The EEOC has now filed motions to dismiss at least six transgender discrimination cases, which were based on allegations of inappropriate comments related to gender identity and misgendering employees. In addition, the Commission has removed nonbinary gender markers from bias charge intake forms. Lucas has signaled that once quorum is met, the Commission will be rescinding the 2024 anti-harassment guidance.
Abortion Accommodation Rules
The EEOC’s 2024 rules related to the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act (“PWFA”) require employers to provide accommodations for pregnant workers, including abortion-related accommodations. The rules were quickly challenged by the attorneys general of 17 states, who argued that the rules were illegal because abortions are not explicitly mentioned in the PWFA. In June 2024, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas rejected a preliminary injunction brought by the states and held that they lacked standing to bring suit. Yesterday, the Eighth Circuit found that the states do have standing to bring the case and remanded, allowing litigation to proceed.
The EEOC has signaled that it will be dropping the Biden-era interpretation of the PWFA, as Lucas, who voted against the current PWFA rules, has stated that they conflate “pregnancy and childbirth accommodations with accommodations related to the female sex, that is, female biology and reproduction.”
AI Bias Guidance
In May 2023, the EEOC issued a technical assistance document outlining how AI algorithms in employment-related tools and programs may violate Title VII protections against bias toward job applicants and employees. The guidance provided employers with information on how to prevent this type of discrimination. The EEOC has since removed the guidance from its website, indicating that AI bias is not a topic of concern for the Trump Administration.
These changes to the EEOC rules and guidance showcase the Trump Administration’s policy priorities and directly impact how private sector employers will handle day-to-day issues surrounding employee gender identity and accommodations. While changes may be underway, employers are still subject to the Biden-era EEOC rules and guidance. They will remain subject to Title VII’s anti-discrimination protections for applicants and employees.
Eric Baisden is a Partner and Co-Chair of Benesch’s Labor & Employment Practice Group. He can be reached at 216.363.4676 or ebaisden@beneschlaw.com.
Adam Primm is a Partner of the Labor & Employment Practice Group. He can be reached at 216.363.4451 or aprimm@beneschlaw.com.
Grace Karam is an Associate in the Labor & Employment Practice Group. She can be reached at 216.363.1502 or gkaram@beneschlaw.com.
Latest News
Ohio Board of Professional Conduct Issues Ohio Ethics Guide on Artificial Intelligence for Lawyers and Judicial Officers
Dispensary tip practices—especially involving hybrid roles like “Leads” or Agents-in-Charge—are increasingly being scrutinized as unlawful as a surge in wage-and-hour lawsuits claim that managers or employees with supervisory duties are improperly sharing in tips meant for front-line staff.
Connecticut Broadens Data Privacy Act Requirements Effective July 1, 2026
Key Takeaways Revised Applicability Scope and Exemptions Effective July 1, 2026, the CTDPA’s existing applicability thresholds are reduced, resulting in …
SCOTUS Extends FAA Exemption to Last-Mile Drivers: What the Flowers Foods decision means for motor carriers and transportation providers
On May 28, 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a unanimous decision in Flowers Foods, Inc. v. Brock, expanding reach of the Federal Arbitration Act’s (“FAA”) Section 1 exemption for transportation workers engaged in interstate commerce. The Court held that a worker who transports goods on an intrastate leg of an interstate journey can qualify for Section 1’s exemption without crossing state lines or interacting with vehicles that do. This decision has significant implications for motor carriers and transportation providers that rely on arbitration agreements to resolve disputes with independent contractors and employee drivers.
Beyond the Buzzwords: State AGs Put Enforcement Muscle Behind Algorithmic Pricing and Age Verification Crackdowns
State AGs are doubling down—across party lines—on consumer protection, with a sharp focus on vulnerable groups and increased scrutiny of algorithmic pricing models and online age verification practices.