Client Alerts & Insights
ELD Mandate Continues Forward as U.S. Supreme Court Denies Cert
June 13, 2017
Yesterday, on Monday, June 12, 2017, the U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear the appeal of the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (“OOIDA”) challenging the electronic logging device (“ELD”) mandate set forth by the U.S. Department of Transportation (“USDOT”). OOIDA had previously challenged the mandate in the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals on the grounds that the mandate violated drivers’ constitutional rights protecting them from warrantless searches and seizures. Unless the U.S. Congress or the USDOT change course on the mandate, which is highly unlikely, the U.S. Supreme Court’s denial of certiorari effectively clears the way for this industry-altering event.
The fast-approaching December 18, 2017 deadline generally requires motor carriers and drivers to utilize approved ELDs to record hours of service, supplanting the long established paper log system. ELD manufacturers are required to self-certify their devices with the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration.
Implementation of ELDs can be a difficult transition for motor carriers and requires careful planning in order to remain compliant and limit operational interference. If you have questions about compliance with the mandate or need help with strategic implementation (employee drivers or independent contractors models), please feel free to contact a member of Benesch’s Transportation & Logistics Practice Group.
Marc Blubaugh at mblubaugh@beneschlaw.com or 614.223.9382
Eric Zalud at ezalud@beneschlaw.com or 216.363.4178
Matthew Selby at mselby@beneschlaw.com or 216.363.4458
Latest News
U.S. Trade Fraud Task Force Surpasses $1 Billion in Recoveries, Signaling Heightened Customs Enforcement
The Department of Justice (DOJ) announced a new inter-agency Trade Fraud Task Force (“Task Force”), designed to “aggressively pursue enforcement actions against any parties who seek to evade tariffs and other duties” and those who attempt to import prohibited goods following the DOJ’s identification of trade and customs fraud as a priority for prosecution.
Major Shift in Federal Labor Board’s Position on Restrictive Covenants
Non-compete agreements are no longer considered presumptively illegal under federal labor law. On June 26, 2026, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) released advice memoranda signaling this dramatic change in how the federal government views non-compete agreements in the workplace. This is welcome news for employers who use non-competes and similar restrictive covenants to protect their businesses.
Course of Performance as Contract Amendment or Waiver: When Business Practices Overrides Paper Terms
Imagine you are a leading manufacturing company, and you purchase a critical widget from a supplier. You have a carefully negotiated contract in place—one that spells out specific pricing, delivery timelines, and product specifications for those widgets.
California AG’s Carbon Health Settlement Raises the Stakes for MSO-PC Structures and Continuity Planning in California
The California Attorney General’s June 2026 settlement with Carbon Health marks the first-of-its kind resolution of an enforcement action directly targeting an MSO-PC structure under California’s corporate practice of medicine (“CPOM”) doctrine.