Client Alerts & Insights
Employers Take Note – 2020 Defense Spending Bill Includes “Ban the Box” Law
January 6, 2020
Authored By:
On December 20, 2019, President Trump signed into law a defense spending bill which included the Fair Chance to Compete for Jobs Act of 2019 (“Fair Chance Act”). Employers should take note that the law (1) prohibits the federal government from requesting criminal history information from applicants until they reach the conditional offer stage; and, for private employers, (2) prohibits federal contractors from requesting criminal history information from candidates for positions within the scope of federal contracts until the conditional offer stage.
These prohibitions, however, contain multiple exceptions, including exceptions for positions that relate to law enforcement and national security duties, positions requiring access to classified information, and positions that, by law, require a federal contractor or the federal government to obtain criminal history information before extending a conditional job offer.
The law further requires the Director of the Office of Personnel Management to promulgate regulations, consistent with existing federal law, that identify additional excluded job positions after giving “due consideration to positions that involve interaction with minors, access to sensitive information, or managing financial transactions.”
Penalties associated with violating the Fair Chance Act range from a written warning to contractors for an “initial violation” to suspension and civil penalties for agency employees who commit more than one violation. Specifically with respect to contractors, “subsequent” violations in the act may result in suspension of payment under the relevant contract for which the applicant was being considered until the contractor demonstrates compliance with the law.
The Fair Chance Act is yet another step — this time at the federal level — in “Ban the Box” legislation, an ever advancing nationwide movement that seeks to advance opportunities for job applicants with criminal records by eliminating any inquiry into the criminal history on initial job applications. As of December 2019, 35 states and more than 150 cities and counties have adopted Ban the Box laws.
With the above in mind, employers must recognize the rapidly changing landscape which surrounds criminal history inquiries during the pre-employment process and, in so doing, ensure that their pre-employment policies, including those which specifically relate to criminal history inquiries, remain up-to-date and otherwise compliant with all applicable rules, laws, and regulations.
For more information on the Fair Chance Act, contact a member of the firm’s Labor & Employment Practice Group.
Johanna Fabrizio Parker at jparker@beneschlaw.com or 216.363.4585; or
Joseph R. Blalock at jblalock@beneschlaw.com or 614.223.9359.
Latest News
The Coming State-Law Litigation Wave of 2026-27: “Subscription Trap” Class Actions
The subscription economy keeps growing—and so does the wave of class-action litigation targeting it. While the FTC’s regulatory efforts have drawn headlines, private class actions under state laws pose an even greater exposure risk.
Updates to Fees and Grace Periods for Nonimmigrant Visas
Starting September 9, 2026, the 9-11 Response Biometric Entry-Exit Fee will apply to H-1B and L-1 extension petitions filed by employers subject to the fee. Prior to the new rule, the fee was only required for (1) initial grant of status to a foreign national seeking H-1B or L-1 status and (2) a change of employer in the same status.
Third Circuit Decision Reshapes Creditor Standing in Successor Liability Disputes
The Third Circuit recently held that when determining whether a successor liability claim belongs to a bankruptcy estate, the key question is whether the claim seeks to remedy harm suffered by all creditors collectively or a unique injury suffered by a specific creditor. The fact that creditors may be permitted to bring the claim outside of bankruptcy is not, by itself, determinative.
CMS Proposes Sweeping Restrictions on Remote Patient Monitoring: The Outsourcing Ban, Reimbursement Revaluation and Potential Code Consolidation in the CY 2027 Physician Fee Schedule Proposed Rule
CMS’s CY 2027 Proposed Rule would significantly restrict Medicare reimbursement for Remote Patient Monitoring (RPM) and Remote Therapeutic Monitoring (RTM), including banning outsourced clinical staffing, adding new patient-relationship and initiating-visit requirements, reducing certain reimbursement rates, and exploring consolidation of existing billing codes.