Commissioner Bernard McNamee, of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC”), has announced that he will officially relinquish his position on September 4, 2020.
Background:
FERC is the agency that regulates the interstate transmission of oil, electricity, and natural gas. It is composed of up to five commissioners who are appointed by the President with the advice and consent of the Senate. Commissioners serve five-year terms, and have an equal vote on regulatory matters.[1]
FERC has been operating with a 3-1 Republican majority since the confirmation of Commissioner James Danly in March of 2020. (For more on Danly see here.) But the departure of McNamee could leave the Commission with the minimum number of commissioners needed for a quorum if President Trump’s two recent nominees are not confirmed before McNamee steps down.
New Nominees:
At the end of July 2020, Trump announced he would nominate two new commissioners to FERC, including a Democratic nominee to fill the vacant seat left by the departure of former Commissioner Cheryl LaFleur in August of 2019.
Trump’s Democratic nominee is Allison Clements, of Ohio. Clements is widely known as a clean energy expert who previously served as director of the Natural Resources Defense Council’s Sustainable FERC project. Trump also nominated Mark C. Christie to fill a Republican seat. Christie is the chairman of the Virginia State Corporation Commission.
Significance:
Both nominees would need to be confirmed by the Senate before being sworn in, and thus, there is a chance they may not be confirmed before McNamee steps down (or before the election on November 3). The typical time between the President’s announcement of intent to nominate and the subsequent confirmation by the Senate has been about three to four months during the Trump Administration.
If Clements and Christie are not confirmed by September 4, 2020, FERC will be left with only three commissioners: Chairman Neil Chatterjee, and Commissioners Richard Glick and James Danly. A full slate of commissioners at FERC helps create certainty for energy companies that proposals will be heard and decided upon in a timely manner. With only three commissioner (the minimum for a quorum), any recusal would prevent FERC from deciding certain matters, such as applications for the construction and operation of natural gas pipelines and liquefied natural gas terminals.
For more information, please contact a member of Benesch’s Energy Practice Group.
[1] https://www.ferc.gov/about/commission-members
Latest News
California AG’s Carbon Health Settlement Raises the Stakes for MSO-PC Structures and Continuity Planning in California
The California Attorney General’s June 2026 settlement with Carbon Health marks the first-of-its kind resolution of an enforcement action directly targeting an MSO-PC structure under California’s corporate practice of medicine (“CPOM”) doctrine.
Supply Chain Security – C-TPAT Program Growing in Significance for U.S. Operations
Geopolitical challenges are triggering executive-level focus on supply chain security across industrial sectors and transportation service providers, including renewed interest in the Customs-Trade Partnership against Terrorism (“C-TPAT”) program.
BREAKING: Seventh Circuit Holds Text Messages are not Telephone Calls Under Section 227(c)(5) of the TCPA
In a significant post-Loper Bright win for defendants, the Seventh Circuit issued its decision in Steidinger v. Blackstone Medical Services, No. 25-2398, affirming a trial court ruling that “§ 227(c)(5) [of the TCPA] does not permit plaintiffs to sue for the receipt of unwanted texts . . . .”
Connecticut’s New PFAS Rules: What Businesses Need to Know About the Regulations and Covered Product Categories
Connecticut has joined the growing roster of states cracking down on per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (“PFAS”), the so-called “forever chemicals” long prized for their water resistance, stain resistance, and non-stick performance.