Client Alerts & Insights
Force Majeure Claims – Contract Provisions, Notices, and Ordinary Business Risk
November 4, 2024
Authored By:
Force majeure contract provisions and force majeure notices have been top of mind more times in recent memory than we care to count. The recent short-lived port strike, two devastating hurricanes, and the Francis Scott Key Bridge impact in Baltimore are just recent examples in a five-year list that includes two wars and a global pandemic. These dramatic unforeseen events cause transportation and logistics providers, as well as their shippers, to closely examine contract terms and the language of notices while scrambling to determine how to continue business uninterrupted.
The true meaning of force majeure sometimes goes missing in those stressful circumstances. Force majeure is essentially a defense to performing as a service provider otherwise committed to do. This means that it saves the service provider from claims of contract breach and resulting damages. It does not, however, mean that failure to perform may continue indefinitely or that it is excused for mere business inconvenience or increased cost.
Force Majeure Events – Most transportation contracts today contain force majeure provisions. The typical structure includes trigger language and also process language. For example, non-performance may be excused by a negotiated list of events such as acts of God, fire, riots, wars, and strikes. Also, the process of what must be done is often expressed such as requiring notice within three days of the force majeure event and possibly allowing the other party to terminate if performance does not commence within a certain number of days. If the circumstances that prohibited performance end then performance must commence without delay.
Ordinary Business Risk – The force majeure event must physically or legally prohibit performance of services in order to be effective. Increased cost of service is insufficient even if it means losing money on a load. Intangible contract requirements are also not excused from performance such as maintenance of insurance or providing defense and indemnity.
Assessing Force Majeure in Real Time – The top six questions when considering possible force majeure circumstances are: (1) What are the triggering events; (2) Are those events happening; (3) Do those in fact prevent performance; (4) Is performance required despite the events; (5) What steps must be taken to claim force majeure; and (5) How long does force majeure last?
Force majeure is not a free-for-all. This is key. It is a concept intended to be fair and equitable by recognizing that unforeseen events can happen, and when they do, parties are best served by communicating with one another under a basic set of ground rules.
Jonathan Todd is Vice Chair of the Transportation & Logistics Practice Group at Benesch Law. He may be reached at 216.363.4658 or jtodd@beneschlaw.com.
Latest News
Passing the Baton: Checklist for In-House Lawyers Retaining New Trial Counsel on the Eve of Trial
Retaining new counsel on the cusp of trial is a momentous decision for any company that requires careful planning and coordination to ensure a smooth transition while maximizing the company’s chances of success in court.
Who Cares About the Wires: Texas Federal Court Rules that Certain Wire Fraud Charges Violate Due Process in Tax Case
A Texas federal court dismissed 13 wire fraud charges in a major tax shelter case, ruling that prosecutors cannot use the wire fraud statute to pursue conduct that should be charged under criminal tax laws, which require a higher standard of intent.
Texas Attorney General Targets Music Streaming “Payola”: What the Civil Investigative Demands Signal for Digital Platforms
On April 22, 2026, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton announced that he has issued Civil Investigative Demands (“CIDs”) to five major music streaming platforms—Spotify, Apple Music, Pandora, Amazon Music, and YouTube Music—launching an investigation into alleged “payola” schemes. According to the Attorney General’s office, the investigation “will examine whether streaming services have entered into undisclosed financial arrangements with record labels, promoters, or third parties to boost visibility, playlist placement, or recommendation rankings in violation of Texas law.”
One Battle After Another: Freight Brokers in a Post-Montgomery World
On May 14, 2026, the Supreme Court of the United States issued its anticipated decision in Montgomery v. Caribe Transport II, LLC, sending shockwaves across the transportation industry.