Client Alerts & Insights
FTC Proposes Revised “Green Guides” and Seeks Public Comment
October 1, 2010
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) recently proposed revisions to its Green Guides, the guidance that the agency gives to help businesses avoid making misleading environmental claims.
As “green” marketing becomes more prevalent to capture the attention of increasingly environmentally conscious consumers, the Green Guides seek to align the claims made by businesses and the expectations of consumers regarding those claims. The Green Guides include guidance on the use of product certifications and seals of approval such as “renewable energy” claims, “renewable materials” claims, and “carbon offset” claims.
Proposed Revisions to the Existing Guidelines
- Marketers should not make unqualified general environmental claims that a product is, for example, “environmentally friendly” or “eco-friendly” because such claims are nearly impossible to substantiate.
- Marketers should not use unqualified certifications or seals of approval.
- Qualifications should use clear, specific, and prominent language limiting the claim to particular attributes for which substantiation exists.
- The guidelines advise marketers how consumers are likely to understand certain environmental claims, including that a product is degradable, compostable, ozone-safe, recyclable, and non-toxic or free of a particular substance. For example, if a marketer claims that a product is “degradable,” it should decompose in a “reasonably short period of time” – no more than one year.
Proposed New Guidelines
- When claiming that a product is made with renewable materials, marketers should qualify the claim with specific information about the renewable materials (e.g., what it is, how it is sourced, etc.) and non-renewable materials in the product.
- When claiming that a product is made with renewable energy, marketers should not make unqualified claims if the power used to manufacture any part of the product was derived from fossil fuels.
- Marketers should specify the source of the renewable energy (e.g., wind, solar, etc.) and make distinction regarding whether less than all of the making of the product was powered with renewable energy or conventional energy offset by renewable energy certificates (REC).
- Marketers should qualify carbon offset claims. Carbon offsets fund projects that reduce greenhouse gas emissions in one place in order to counterbalance or “offset” emissions that occur elsewhere.
- Marketers should disclose whether the emission reductions that are being offset by a consumer’s purchase will not occur within two years and to avoid advertising an offset if the activity that produces the offset is already required by law.
The Guides do not address use of the terms “sustainable,” “natural,” and “organic” because agricultural products are currently covered by the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s National Organic Program and therefore the FTC wants to avoid duplication in guidelines.
The FTC is seeking public comments on all aspects of the proposed changes until December 10, 2010, after which it will decide which changes to make final.
Additional Information
For additional information, please contact:
Luis A. Carrion at (216) 363-4635 or lcarrion@beneschlaw.com
Latest News
The Faster Labor Contracts Act Would Permit Federal Government to Impose Union Contract Terms on Employers
The federal government may soon be able to impose the terms of first collective bargaining agreements (“CBAs”) on private sector employers and unions.
Going Back to the “Well”: Plaintiffs Target Wellness Branding by Attacking Ingredients
Plaintiffs are increasingly targeting food and beverage companies’ “wellness” and “free-from” marketing claims, focusing on ingredient-level details that allegedly contradict broad statements on the labels.
The CFTC’s New Cooperation Playbook: What Practitioners Need to Know About Letter No. 26-15
In a recent Staff Advisory to the Enforcement Division , the Commodities and Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”) released guidance on how companies can avoid enforcement actions—or receive substantial penalty reductions—through early and full disclosure of potential misconduct.
Ohio Board of Professional Conduct Issues Ohio Ethics Guide on Artificial Intelligence for Lawyers and Judicial Officers
Dispensary tip practices—especially involving hybrid roles like “Leads” or Agents-in-Charge—are increasingly being scrutinized as unlawful as a surge in wage-and-hour lawsuits claim that managers or employees with supervisory duties are improperly sharing in tips meant for front-line staff.