Client Alerts & Insights
House Bill 81: Changes to the Ohio Workers’ Compensation Law
September 14, 2020
Authored By:
Ohio H.B. 81, which became effective on September 15, 2020, makes a few noteworthy changes to the Ohio workers’ compensation law. The stated intent of the new bill was to create workers’ compensation coverage for detention facility employees; however, the new bill makes several changes that could benefit all Ohio employers.
First, H.B. 81 codifies the voluntary abandonment doctrine regarding temporary total disability compensation. Under the new law, “if an employee is not working or has suffered a wage loss as the direct result of reasons unrelated to the allowed injury or occupational disease, the employee is not eligible to receive compensation.” In short, if the employee cannot work due to factors unrelated to the injury, such as being fired for poor attendance unrelated to a compensable injury, the employee will not be able to receive temporary total disability compensation. Because H.B. 81 supersedes all prior court decision regarding voluntarily abandonment, its effect will be to eliminate several judicially-created exceptions to the voluntary abandonment doctrine. The new voluntary abandonment defense applies to claims pending on or arising after September 15, 2020.
Second, H.B. 81 shortens the statute of limitations for applications for additional awards for violations of specific safety requirements (“VSSR”) from two years to one year after the date of the compensable injury. The reduced one-year limitations period brings VSSRs in line with the relatively new one-year limitations period for filing a workers’ compensation claim. The one-year limitations period for VSSRs applies to all claims pending on and arising after September 15, 2020.
Third, H.B. 81 also shortens the length of time in which a claim remains open. Under the new law, the Industrial Commission can invoke its continuing jurisdiction during the five years from the last medical services being rendered or the date of the last payment of compensation. Previously, the Industrial Commission could invoke its continuing jurisdiction during the five years from the last date of payment of the medical services. In essence, the continuing jurisdiction period could be shortened a month or two.
Finally, H.B. 81 permits a claimant’s settlement application to be processed without the state-funded employer’s consent if (1) the claim is no longer in the employer’s experience and (2) the injured worker is no longer employed by the employer.
If you have any questions, we encourage you to reach out to your Benesch contact or one of the attorneys below to discuss.
Joseph N. Gross at jgross@beneschlaw.com or 216.363.4163.
Brad Wenclewicz at bwenclewicz@beneschlaw.com or 216.363.6191.
Latest News
U.S. Trade Fraud Task Force Surpasses $1 Billion in Recoveries, Signaling Heightened Customs Enforcement
The Department of Justice (DOJ) announced a new inter-agency Trade Fraud Task Force (“Task Force”), designed to “aggressively pursue enforcement actions against any parties who seek to evade tariffs and other duties” and those who attempt to import prohibited goods following the DOJ’s identification of trade and customs fraud as a priority for prosecution.
Major Shift in Federal Labor Board’s Position on Restrictive Covenants
Non-compete agreements are no longer considered presumptively illegal under federal labor law. On June 26, 2026, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) released advice memoranda signaling this dramatic change in how the federal government views non-compete agreements in the workplace. This is welcome news for employers who use non-competes and similar restrictive covenants to protect their businesses.
Course of Performance as Contract Amendment or Waiver: When Business Practices Overrides Paper Terms
Imagine you are a leading manufacturing company, and you purchase a critical widget from a supplier. You have a carefully negotiated contract in place—one that spells out specific pricing, delivery timelines, and product specifications for those widgets.
California AG’s Carbon Health Settlement Raises the Stakes for MSO-PC Structures and Continuity Planning in California
The California Attorney General’s June 2026 settlement with Carbon Health marks the first-of-its kind resolution of an enforcement action directly targeting an MSO-PC structure under California’s corporate practice of medicine (“CPOM”) doctrine.