A case pending before the National Labor Relations Board has the potential to have a profound impact on unionization of the workplace. In Specialty Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center, 356 NLRB No. 56, the Board is expected to change the Board’s 50-year bargaining standards to permit unions to organize units of employees who perform the same job. This would be a far narrower bargaining unit standard than in the past. In practical terms such a ruling could
- Make it much easier for unions to organize a workplace.
- Increase the probability that a workplace will have multiple bargaining units representing different classifications of employees.
- Increase the probability that a company’s employees will be represented by—and the company must bargain with—multiple unions.
- Increase the probability that an employer would have to manage separate work schedules, grievance procedures, wage schedules and benefit packages for the various bargaining units in a given workplace.
- Reduce management’s flexibility in matters such as hiring, work assignments, transfers, promotions, layoffs and overtime.
- Increase the man-hours a company spends on personnel matters such as discipline, grievances, arbitrations and bargaining.
- Reduce productivity and increase costs.
Amicus briefs in this case are due March 8. The Board will likely issue a decision within six months thereafter. Employers should review their union-free strategies in the interim. Emphasis should be placed on defining job descriptions and structuring duties so that unions cannot readily cherry-pick employees to organize.
Additional Information:
If you have any questions, please contact any of the following members of Benesch’s Labor & Employment Practice Group:
Peter N. Kirsanow at 216.363.4481 or pkirsanow@beneschlaw.com
Maynard A. Buck at 216.363.4694 or mbuck@beneschlaw.com
Joseph N. Gross at 216.363.4163 or jgross@beneschlaw.com
Steven M. Moss at 216.363.4675 or smoss@beneschlaw.com
Latest News
The Coming State-Law Litigation Wave of 2026-27: “Subscription Trap” Class Actions
The subscription economy keeps growing—and so does the wave of class-action litigation targeting it. While the FTC’s regulatory efforts have drawn headlines, private class actions under state laws pose an even greater exposure risk.
Updates to Fees and Grace Periods for Nonimmigrant Visas
Starting September 9, 2026, the 9-11 Response Biometric Entry-Exit Fee will apply to H-1B and L-1 extension petitions filed by employers subject to the fee. Prior to the new rule, the fee was only required for (1) initial grant of status to a foreign national seeking H-1B or L-1 status and (2) a change of employer in the same status.
Third Circuit Decision Reshapes Creditor Standing in Successor Liability Disputes
The Third Circuit recently held that when determining whether a successor liability claim belongs to a bankruptcy estate, the key question is whether the claim seeks to remedy harm suffered by all creditors collectively or a unique injury suffered by a specific creditor. The fact that creditors may be permitted to bring the claim outside of bankruptcy is not, by itself, determinative.
CMS Proposes Sweeping Restrictions on Remote Patient Monitoring: The Outsourcing Ban, Reimbursement Revaluation and Potential Code Consolidation in the CY 2027 Physician Fee Schedule Proposed Rule
CMS’s CY 2027 Proposed Rule would significantly restrict Medicare reimbursement for Remote Patient Monitoring (RPM) and Remote Therapeutic Monitoring (RTM), including banning outsourced clinical staffing, adding new patient-relationship and initiating-visit requirements, reducing certain reimbursement rates, and exploring consolidation of existing billing codes.