Client Alerts & Insights
In Growing Trend, State Legislature Passes One of the Nation’s Broadest Paid Leave Laws
May 9, 2019
Authored By:
On May 7 and 8, 2019, the Maine State Legislature passed a bill that would require private employers to provide most employees with up to 40 hours of paid leave each year—with no restrictions on permissible uses. The bill, as originally proposed, was focused specifically on paid sick leave, but after the amendment process, the legislation that was ultimately voted on and passed provides for a more general paid leave. While other states require paid sick leave to allow employees to deal with illness, or paid family leave to allow employees to bond with newborns, Maine’s legislation would permit employees to take paid leave for any reason, even one as mundane as having a furnace serviced.
Under the legislation, employers with ten or more employees would be required to offer up to 40 hours of paid leave each year, at an accrual rate of one hour of paid leave for every 40 hours worked. Accrual would begin at the start of employment, though employers could prohibit the use of paid leave during an employee’s first 120 days of employment.
In yet another break from most paid leave ordinances across the country, the Maine legislation would only require employees to provide “reasonable notice” of the intent to use paid leave in the absence of an emergency. Conversely, most paid leave laws allow employers to require specific advance notice whenever the need for leave foreseeable, and even when the need for leave is not foreseeable, require employees to provide notice as soon as practicable. The language in Maine’s legislation is decidedly more relaxed. Nonetheless, the legislation does provide that the use of leave in non-emergency situations shall be scheduled to avoid undue hardship on the employer.
The bill must still be approved for a second time by both the House and Senate, before heading to the Governor’s desk to be signed into law. Governor Janet Mills has already expressed support for the bill and, with both chambers of the legislature already voting to pass the legislation once, it seems likely that the bill’s enactment is inevitable. Once signed into law, the legislation is slated to take effect on January 1, 2021.
For more information on this topic, please contact a member of the firm’s Labor & Employment Practice Group.
Margo Wolf O’Donnell at modonnell@beneschlaw.com or 312.212.4982.
Latest News
Section 301 Duties for Forced Labor – Step 3 in IEEPA Replacement and its Impact
The White House initiated its third step in replacing IEEPA tariffs on Friday, July 24. Specifically, the U.S. Trade Representative (“USTR”) published final Section 301 findings and duty rates for imports from 30 countries following its investigation of harms on the domestic industry due to forced labor in those countries’ supply chains.
New York City’s Protected Time Off Law (PTOL) Final Rules Effective as of July 23, 2026
The New York City Department of Consumer and Worker Protection (DCWP) has adopted final rules implementing the City’s significantly expanded Earned Safe and Sick Time Act (ESSTA), now referred to as the Protected Time Off Law (PTOL).
U.S. Trade Fraud Task Force Surpasses $1 Billion in Recoveries, Signaling Heightened Customs Enforcement
The Department of Justice (DOJ) announced a new inter-agency Trade Fraud Task Force (“Task Force”), designed to “aggressively pursue enforcement actions against any parties who seek to evade tariffs and other duties” and those who attempt to import prohibited goods following the DOJ’s identification of trade and customs fraud as a priority for prosecution.
Major Shift in Federal Labor Board’s Position on Restrictive Covenants
Non-compete agreements are no longer considered presumptively illegal under federal labor law. On June 26, 2026, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) released advice memoranda signaling this dramatic change in how the federal government views non-compete agreements in the workplace. This is welcome news for employers who use non-competes and similar restrictive covenants to protect their businesses.