Client Alerts & Insights
Liability Insurance Limits Double for CMVs on July 1st under New Jersey Law
June 14, 2024
Authored By:
Beginning on July 1, 2024, all owners and registered owners of certain motor vehicles with nexus to New Jersey will be legally required to hold at least $1,500,000 in automobile liability insurance. This new law doubles the federal minimum standard of $750,000 as provided at 49 C.F.R. § 387.9. The New Jersey Assembly Bill A4292 is a first-of-its kind in the Nation to require these insurance limits for the lawful operation of non-hazmat property-carrying commercial motor vehicles (“CMVs”) with gross vehicle weight ratings equal to or in excess of 26,001 pounds. CMVs with a gross vehicle weight rating of 10,001 or more pounds, but less than 26,001 pounds, must carry at least $300,000 of coverage.
These new minimum limits will apply to CMVs that are registered or principally garaged in New Jersey, and it is the vehicle owners or registered owners who bear the compliance obligation, rather than the operating motor carriers. The law also provides that the new insurance requirements may be satisfied by a commercial automobile insurance policy, fleet insurance policy, commercial umbrella insurance policy, commercial excess insurance policy, similar insurance policy, or any combination thereof. As a result, the net effect of A4292 will only impact those motor carriers with CMVs that do not already carry a portfolio of insurance coverages that satisfy the required level.
Regulatory compliance burden outside of New Jersey remains to be seen, for example, the precise determination of which vehicles are considered “principally garaged” in the State among large nationwide or regional fleets. Also, the International Registration Plan (“IRP”) could possibly bring out-of-state carriers into question given that New Jersey is a participant of the IRP. Other States or Commonwealths may follow New Jersey’s lead, but in all events, the operating cost of CMVs in the State, and the risk of increased claims exposure for equipment owners due to technical non-compliance, appears to be on the horizon.
Jonathan Todd is Vice Chair of the Transportation & Logistics Practice at Benesch Law. You may reach him at 216-363-4658 or at jtodd@beneschlaw.com.
Tom O’Donnell is Of Counsel in the Transportation & Logistics Practice at Benesch Law. You may reach him at 302-442-7007 or todonnell@beneschlaw.com.
Phil Nester is a Senior Managing Associate in the Transportation & Logistics Practice at Benesch Law. You may reach him at 216-363-6240 or jpnester@beneschlaw.com.
Latest News
The LEAD Model—Kidney Care’s Value-Based Care Journey LEADs Here
For more than a decade, nephrology practices have participated in Innovation Center kidney‑focused models—beginning with ESRD Seamless Care Organizations (“ESCOs”) under the Comprehensive ESRD Care (“CEC”) Model (2015–2021), followed by today’s Kidney Care Choices (“KCC”) Model (2022–2027). With KCC scheduled to end in December 2027, kidney care providers are approaching a critical transition point. The Long‑term Enhanced ACO Design (“LEAD”) Model, for which CMS released the Request for Applications (“RFA”) on March 31, 2026 (revised April 15, 2026), represents the next phase of CMS’s value‑based care strategy—but it differs fundamentally from the kidney‑specific models that preceded it.
Supreme Court Clarifies Federal Jurisdiction in Arbitration Cases
On May 14, 2026, the Supreme Court unanimously ruled that when a federal district court enforces an arbitration provision in an employment agreement and sends the dispute to arbitration, the court retains jurisdiction to confirm or vacate any resulting arbitral award.
Passing the Baton: Checklist for In-House Lawyers Retaining New Trial Counsel on the Eve of Trial
Retaining new counsel on the cusp of trial is a momentous decision for any company that requires careful planning and coordination to ensure a smooth transition while maximizing the company’s chances of success in court.
Who Cares About the Wires: Texas Federal Court Rules that Certain Wire Fraud Charges Violate Due Process in Tax Case
A Texas federal court dismissed 13 wire fraud charges in a major tax shelter case, ruling that prosecutors cannot use the wire fraud statute to pursue conduct that should be charged under criminal tax laws, which require a higher standard of intent.