Client Alerts & Insights
Liability Insurance Limits Double for CMVs on July 1st under New Jersey Law
June 14, 2024
Authored By:
Beginning on July 1, 2024, all owners and registered owners of certain motor vehicles with nexus to New Jersey will be legally required to hold at least $1,500,000 in automobile liability insurance. This new law doubles the federal minimum standard of $750,000 as provided at 49 C.F.R. § 387.9. The New Jersey Assembly Bill A4292 is a first-of-its kind in the Nation to require these insurance limits for the lawful operation of non-hazmat property-carrying commercial motor vehicles (“CMVs”) with gross vehicle weight ratings equal to or in excess of 26,001 pounds. CMVs with a gross vehicle weight rating of 10,001 or more pounds, but less than 26,001 pounds, must carry at least $300,000 of coverage.
These new minimum limits will apply to CMVs that are registered or principally garaged in New Jersey, and it is the vehicle owners or registered owners who bear the compliance obligation, rather than the operating motor carriers. The law also provides that the new insurance requirements may be satisfied by a commercial automobile insurance policy, fleet insurance policy, commercial umbrella insurance policy, commercial excess insurance policy, similar insurance policy, or any combination thereof. As a result, the net effect of A4292 will only impact those motor carriers with CMVs that do not already carry a portfolio of insurance coverages that satisfy the required level.
Regulatory compliance burden outside of New Jersey remains to be seen, for example, the precise determination of which vehicles are considered “principally garaged” in the State among large nationwide or regional fleets. Also, the International Registration Plan (“IRP”) could possibly bring out-of-state carriers into question given that New Jersey is a participant of the IRP. Other States or Commonwealths may follow New Jersey’s lead, but in all events, the operating cost of CMVs in the State, and the risk of increased claims exposure for equipment owners due to technical non-compliance, appears to be on the horizon.
Jonathan Todd is Vice Chair of the Transportation & Logistics Practice at Benesch Law. You may reach him at 216-363-4658 or at jtodd@beneschlaw.com.
Tom O’Donnell is Of Counsel in the Transportation & Logistics Practice at Benesch Law. You may reach him at 302-442-7007 or todonnell@beneschlaw.com.
Phil Nester is a Senior Managing Associate in the Transportation & Logistics Practice at Benesch Law. You may reach him at 216-363-6240 or jpnester@beneschlaw.com.
Latest News
Supreme Court 2025: Key Free Speech Rulings
The Supreme Court’s 2025 decisions signaled a more regulator-friendly view of the internet—upholding laws on age verification and foreign-owned platforms under intermediate scrutiny, even where speech is burdened. These cases reaffirm that content-neutral rules that incidentally affect speech are likely to survive constitutional challenge.
Nobody—Not Even Einstein—Has Figured Out What Causes Gravity, but You Need to if You Are Facing a Putative Consumer Class Action in the 9th Circuit
The common argument made by plaintiffs that differences in alleged misrepresentations are transcended by the center of the gravity of the alleged fraud should not be addressed through the typical approach of just comparing the level of variance of the representations in the case at issue with that in the relevant precedent.
The Faster Labor Contracts Act Would Permit Federal Government to Impose Union Contract Terms on Employers
The federal government may soon be able to impose the terms of first collective bargaining agreements (“CBAs”) on private sector employers and unions.
Going Back to the “Well”: Plaintiffs Target Wellness Branding by Attacking Ingredients
Plaintiffs are increasingly targeting food and beverage companies’ “wellness” and “free-from” marketing claims, focusing on ingredient-level details that allegedly contradict broad statements on the labels.