Client Alerts & Insights
Michigan Joins the List of States Requiring Employers to Provide Paid Time Off
March 11, 2025
Authored By:
Under the amended Michigan Earned Sick Time Act (“ESTA”), Michigan employees will now accrue 1 hour of paid sick time for every 30 hours worked. ESTA was effective February 21, 2025, for employers with 10 or more employees. Employers with 10 or fewer employees will have until October 1, 2025, to comply with the amendment.
Covered Employers
The amended ESTA applies to all Michigan employers with more than one employee.
Employee Eligibility
All employees are covered under ESTA, including part-time and temporary employees. Employers may impose a 120-day new hire waiting period for employees hired after February 21, 2025. During the waiting period, employees will accrue sick time but will not be able to use it until the conclusion of the waiting period.
Benefit Amount
Employee benefit amounts vary based on the number of employees.
- Employers with 10 or fewer employees: 40 hours of paid sick leave per year.
- Employers with more than 10 employees: 72 hours of paid sick leave per year.
Accrual
Employees must accrue 1 hour of paid sick time for every 30 hours worked.
Carryover
Employees may carry over used sick time from year to year. However, employers may limit employee usage to 72 hours per year (40 hours for smaller employers). Carryover is not required if the employer frontloads earned sick time.
Usage
Employees are entitled to use earned sick time in 1-hour increments or the smallest increment the employer uses for tracking sick time usage.
Frontloading
As an alternative to the accrual method, employers may elect to frontload paid earned sick time at the beginning of the benefit year for immediate use. Employers who frontload do not need to calculate or track accrual. If an employer elects to frontload earned sick time, they are not required to allow employees to carry over unused earned sick time from one year to the next year.
Additional Requirements to Note
- Employers may not require an employee to search for or secure a replacement worker as a condition for using earned sick time.
- Employers cannot take disciplinary action against employees who no-call or no-show for up to three days without notice.
- Employers must retain a record of hours worked and earned sick time taken for three years.
Enforcement
The amended ESTA gives the Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity the power to impose civil penalties of up to 8 times the employee’s normal hourly wage and up to a $1,000 fine for each violation.
What Employers Should Do
Employers should update internal procedures and handbooks to ensure that their time off policies comply with Michigan’s new requirements. Employers with existing combined paid time off policies may already comply with ESTA’s leave requirements. If an employer provides 72 (or more) hours of paid time off per year and does not want a separate policy here, they still need to make sure that other provisions, such as when time can be used and notice provisions, are consistent with ESTA’s requirements.
For more information, please contact a member of Benesch’s Labor and Employment Practice Group.
Joanna Fabrizio Parker is a Partner of Benesch’s Labor & Employment Practice Group. She can be reached at 216.363.4585 or jparker@beneschlaw.com.
Alyson Waite is an Associate in Benesch’s Labor & Employment Practice Group. She can be reached at 216.363.4414 or awaite@beneschlaw.com.
Latest News
Back To Wright Line: NLRB Resets Standards for Workplace Misconduct
Employers have regained greater flexibility to address offensive or abusive employee conduct that occurs during union activity or other activity protected by the National Labor Relations Act. On September 23, 2026, the National Labor Relations Board (the “Board”) issued a significant decision in Lion Elastomers LLC, 375 NLRB No. 41, restoring the prior standard for evaluating discipline when employee misconduct occurs during protected concerted activity from General Motors LLC, 369 NLRB No. 127.
Can an Algorithm Commit a Tort? The Circuit Split Over Section 230
A growing circuit split is reshaping the scope of Section 230 immunity. While the Fourth and Ninth Circuits continue to view algorithmic recommendations as protected publisher conduct, the Third Circuit has taken a narrower approach, holding that certain algorithm-driven content recommendations may constitute a platform’s own conduct and therefore fall outside Section 230’s protections.
Key Considerations for Businesses facing Defamation Issues: Strategies for Protecting Your Reputation and Brand
Defamation risk for businesses has never been higher. Even five years ago, unfavorable press could be expected to fade from …
SDNY Bankruptcy Court Offers Further Direction on Default Interest and Fee Recovery
The SDNY Bankruptcy Court’s written decision in 1300 Desert Willow builds on the framework established in Mako, providing additional guidance on when a debtor can overcome the presumption that an oversecured creditor is entitled to post-petition default interest at the contractual rate.