Client Alerts & Insights
Navigating the New Regulations on E-Books in China
March 1, 2011
On October 9, 2010, the General Administration of Press and Publication of the People’s Republic of China (“GAAP”) issued an opinion regarding the development of the E-book industry (GAAP [2010] No.9) (the “Opinion”). Under the Opinion, China imposed license requirements on the e-book industry. There are four types of e-book licenses: (i) Publishing Licenses, which are issued to companies engaged in e-books publishing; (ii) Duplicating Licenses, which are issued to companies engaged in converting books to digital books, editing, and chip implantation of e-book content; (iii) Distribution Licenses, issued to companies engaged in wholesale or retail sales of e-books; and (iv) Importing Licenses, issued to companies engaged in importing e-books. The E-book Licenses are subject to annual audit, and if companies with E-book Licenses fail to maintain appropriate standards, their E-Book Licenses will be revoked.
To date, 21 Chinese companies have obtained E-book Licenses. The majority of these companies have obtained only one type of E-book License, while a few have obtained both an E-book Duplicating License and a Distribution License. However, there are no companies that have been issued both an Importing License and a Distribution License. Practically speaking, therefore, foreign e-book companies will need to work with both e-book importers and e-book distributors in China for their products to enter the Chinese market.
Naturally, foreign e-book companies are interested in obtaining their own licenses to enter into the Chinese market. However, to date, no foreign companies have been granted any type of E-book License. In a telephone conversation with a GAAP official, we were told this was because only Chinese companies may apply for E-book Licenses. However, the Opinion does not indicate that only domestic Chinese companies are eligible for E-Book Licenses, and, indeed, that position is contrary to applicable authority. Since at least May 2003, foreign companies have been permitted to form wholly-owned companies in China to engage in book, newspaper, and journal distribution. Later, on April 16, 2004, the Ministry of Commerce issued certain Measures for the Administration of Foreign Investment in the Commercial Sector (the “Distribution Regulation”) setting forth measures to guide foreign companies in applying to form these distribution companies. For this reason, we believe that foreign companies are entitled to apply for and obtain the E-Book Distribution and E-Book Importing Licenses specified by the GAAP in its recent Opinion.
While some aspects of navigating the new Chinese E-book regulations may be complex, we are optimistic that, with appropriate guidance, foreign companies will eventually succeed in obtaining the sanctioned E-book licenses.
Additional Information
For additional information, please contact:
Yanping Wang at (8621) 3222-0388 or ywang@beneschlaw.com
Latest News
EEOC Proposes Rollback of EEO-1 Reporting Requirements
On May 14, 2026, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) submitted a proposal to the White House Office of Management …
The LEAD Model—Kidney Care’s Value-Based Care Journey LEADs Here
For more than a decade, nephrology practices have participated in Innovation Center kidney‑focused models—beginning with ESRD Seamless Care Organizations (“ESCOs”) under the Comprehensive ESRD Care (“CEC”) Model (2015–2021), followed by today’s Kidney Care Choices (“KCC”) Model (2022–2027). With KCC scheduled to end in December 2027, kidney care providers are approaching a critical transition point. The Long‑term Enhanced ACO Design (“LEAD”) Model, for which CMS released the Request for Applications (“RFA”) on March 31, 2026 (revised April 15, 2026), represents the next phase of CMS’s value‑based care strategy—but it differs fundamentally from the kidney‑specific models that preceded it.
Supreme Court Clarifies Federal Jurisdiction in Arbitration Cases
On May 14, 2026, the Supreme Court unanimously ruled that when a federal district court enforces an arbitration provision in an employment agreement and sends the dispute to arbitration, the court retains jurisdiction to confirm or vacate any resulting arbitral award.
Passing the Baton: Checklist for In-House Lawyers Retaining New Trial Counsel on the Eve of Trial
Retaining new counsel on the cusp of trial is a momentous decision for any company that requires careful planning and coordination to ensure a smooth transition while maximizing the company’s chances of success in court.