Client Alerts & Insights
New Oklahoma “Mini-TCPA” Law Set to Go Into Effect in November
June 3, 2022
Authored By:
Oklahoma’s House Bill No. 3168 was signed into law on May 20, 2022, prohibiting the use of an “automated system” to make a “commercial telephonic sales call” without the “prior express written consent” of the “called party.” This new law, which includes a $500 statutory damages provision, takes effect November 1, 2022.
Oklahoma is the latest to join states like Florida in placing restrictions on telephonic sales calls in the wake of the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Facebook v. Duguid, 141 S. Ct. 1163, 1167 (2021), which significantly limited the application of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”) to live calls and text messages. These so-called “mini-TCPA” laws establish varying degrees of liability, but the Oklahoma Telephone Solicitation Act of 2022 (“OTSA”) largely mimics the stringent Florida Telephone Solicitation Act (“FTSA”).
The OTSA’s definition of dialing technology is potentially broader than the TCPA’s “automatic telephone dialing system” definition. Like Florida’s FTSA, the OTSA applies to “commercial telephonic sales calls” that involve “an automated system for the selection or dialing of telephone numbers or the playing of a recorded message when a connection is completed to a number called” (emphasis added). While the statute provides certain definitions—like for “called party,” “prior express written consent” and “signature,” key terms are undefined.
Terms like “automated system” and “commercial telephonic sales call” have no definition, meaning courts and litigants will be the first to interpret these naturally vague terms. Furthermore, the failure to define “commercial telephonic sales call” will give rise to predictable efforts from the plaintiffs’ bar to sweep in a potentially broad array of calls that may not have direct solicitation as a goal or constitute advertisements by any conventional understanding. This is not to mention the natural First Amendment implications of singling out one type of speech for particular and burdensome treatment. The OTSA also does not specifically define what constitutes a “call”—and thus whether it includes text messages—though the definition of “prior express written consent” does specifically include text messages. The OTSA does create a rebuttable presumption that any call made to a number with an Oklahoma area code is made to an Oklahoma resident or to a person in Oklahoma at the time of the call, and therefore subject to the law.
The OTSA prohibits “more than 3 calls in a 24-hour period” on the same subject matter or issue, as well as all telephonic sales calls between the hours of 8 p.m. and 8 a.m. It also proscribes tactics that a telephonic solicitor may use to mislead answering parties, such as intentionally preventing the transmission of the solicitor’s name or number, using technology that deliberately displays a different caller identification number, or altering the voice of the caller. However, it does permit a company to substitute the name of the seller on behalf of which a commercial telephonic sales call is placed and the seller’s customer service telephone number, which is answered during regular business hours, for the name and telephone number used in or billed for making the call that will appear through caller identification.
Critically, although prior express written consent is the only stated exception permitted for automated commercial telephonic sales calls, the OTSA also lists a variety of exemptions in a separate provision. This includes: calls made for certain noncommercial purposes (like religious, charitable, etc.), calls where there is no major sales presentation during the call and where no sale is made on the call, calls made by certain financial institutions, calls made by licensed insurance brokers, B2B calls, calls made to a recipient with an established business relationship, calls by certain retailers meeting a variety of prerequisites, and calls by certain realtors. In all, there are twenty-six enumerated categories of exemptions.
Finally, the Oklahoma law expressly allows for a private right of action to enforce these provisions. The potential damages are the usual $500 per violation, which can be trebled for willful or knowing violations. There is no indication that attorneys’ fees may be awarded under the law.
It is important for businesses to be prepared for the revised law to go into effect on November 1, 2022. Businesses should ensure they meet an applicable exemption or have appropriate express written consent to contact numbers with Oklahoma area codes when placing calls or texts.
For more information, please contact a member of the firm’s TCPA Practice Group.
Mark S. Eisen at meisen@beneschlaw.com or 312.212.4956.
Latest News
Federal Court Hands Major Win to Tissue Product Manufacturers – FDA’s HCT/P Classification Decision for Umbilical Cord–Derived Product CORDGRAFT Rejected
On March 18, 2026, Chief Judge Brian C. Wimes of the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri issued a significant decision overturning the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s (“FDA”) classification of Vitti Labs’ umbilical cord–derived product, CORDGRAFT.
Science-Backed But Not FDA-Approved: New Lawsuit Challenges FDA’s Rejection of 114 Health-Related Advertising Claims
A new lawsuit challenges the FDA’s rejection of 114 health-related advertising claims for supplements, arguing that the agency’s narrow interpretation of what counts as an “authoritative statement” unfairly blocks science-backed—but not FDA-approved—claims from appearing on product labels.
When ChatGPT Lies: What the First Wave of AI Defamation Cases Means for Plaintiffs
The common argument made by plaintiffs that differences in alleged misrepresentations are transcended by the center of the gravity of the alleged fraud should not be addressed through the typical approach of just comparing the level of variance of the representations in the case at issue with that in the relevant precedent.
Delaware Adopts Uniform Assignment for the Benefit of Creditors Act, Expanding Bankruptcy Alternative for Distressed Companies
Customs compliance and enforcement defense are high-profile exercises within U.S.-based importers due to the higher-risk regulatory enforcement environment. One of the more complex hot topics facing compliance and legal professionals within importers of record (IORs) is the degree to which “assists” impact dutiable value, and therefore duty burden, in the eyes of U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP).