Client Alerts & Insights
Ohio Creates New For-Profit Benefit Corporation
December 3, 2020
Authored By:
A new law passed in Ohio that will create a “For-Profit Benefit Corporation” designation in Ohio. Senate Bill 21 amends Ohio Corporation law, as contained in ORC §1701, providing for a new form of for-profit corporation, a Benefit Corporation, affording the corporation and its directors protection against liability to shareholders relating to the corporation’s pursuit of a beneficial purpose.
What is a Benefit Corporation?
A benefit corporation is a for-profit corporation that is authorized by a specific provision in its organizational documents to pursue one or more beneficial purposes in addition to the other legal purposes for which for-profit corporations may be formed. Benefit corporations do not receive any special government incentives to operate for a beneficial purpose (e.g., special tax treatment) and are subject to all the other requirements and limitations imposed by Ohio law on for-profit corporations.
What is Beneficial Purpose?
A beneficial purpose can be any purpose that has beneficial effects on persons, entities, communities, or interests, other than shareholders in their capacity as shareholders, including effects of an artistic, charitable, cultural, economic, educational, environmental, literary, medical, religious, scientific, or technological nature. Under the new law, benefit corporations and their directors are protected from liability to beneficiaries of a beneficial purpose and specifically owe no duty to such beneficiaries.
Ohio joins at least 31 other states that have adopted amendments to their respective corporation laws to provide for the creation of benefit corporations. Ohio’s proposed legislation differs from that adopted in some other states due to its flexibility. Some state laws require each benefit corporation to produce an annual public benefit report prepared against a third-party standard that describes how and to what extent the corporation has accomplished its beneficial purpose.
Senate Bill 21 gives shareholders the flexibility to determine what, if any, public reporting would be required. For example, the owners of a corner grocery store that operate for a profit may also approve cancer research as a beneficial purpose without being required to report publicly. However, a company wishing to attract investors who make investment decisions based on a beneficial purpose can provide for public reporting and auditing of the report.
In either circumstance, benefit corporations would still be required to produce annual financial statements (as required by O.R.C. §1701.38) for shareholders, and shareholders would still be entitled to examine the books and records of the corporation (as provided for in §1701.37(C)). The type of investor and the type of investment is changing. The new generation of investment wants to provide capital for corporations that combine a for-profit mentality while promoting a civic responsibility to the community.
Well-known examples of Benefit Corporations across the country include Kickstarter, Patagonia, Laureaute Education and King Arthur Flour Company.
To learn more about Benefit Corporations or any other matter pending before the Ohio General Assembly, contact a member of the firm’s Government Relations Practice Group.
Martha J. Sweterlitsch
at msweterlitsch@beneschlaw.com or 614.223.9367.
Rachel Winder at rwinder@beneschlaw.com or 614.223.9316.
Latest News
Tariff Refund Q&A: What to Do Now and What Legal Issues Lay Ahead
The administrative process for obtaining IEEPA tariff refunds from U.S. Customs and Border Protection will soon go live. This brings to a close the wide speculation about whether an administrative process will be available to importers who paid IEEPA-based tariffs that the U.S. Supreme Court determined were unlawful.
LEAD vs. ACO REACH–What’s Changing and Why the LEAD Model Matters for ACOs and Participating Providers
The Long-term Enhanced ACO Design (“LEAD”) model is Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Innovation Center’s (Innovation Center) newly announced successor to the ACO Realizing Equity, Access, and Community Health (REACH) model. While LEAD retains the core framework of two-sided risk and population-based payments, it introduces critical changes aimed at making the program more sustainable, inclusive and effective to foster longer term administration for providers.
CMS Puts Specialists in the Game with LEAD
For years, many specialist physicians have watched Medicare’s ACO programs from the sidelines, uncertain how to participate in models historically centered on primary care providers. The Long-term Enhanced ACO Design (LEAD) Model marks a fundamental shift in this dynamic.
CMS Bets on the Long Game with 10‑Year LEAD ACO Model
The Long-term Enhanced ACO Design (LEAD) Model is the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation’s (Innovation Center) next-generation accountable care initiative, created to succeed the ACO REACH model in 2027.