Client Alerts & Insights
Ohio Creates New For-Profit Benefit Corporation
December 3, 2020
Authored By:
A new law passed in Ohio that will create a “For-Profit Benefit Corporation” designation in Ohio. Senate Bill 21 amends Ohio Corporation law, as contained in ORC §1701, providing for a new form of for-profit corporation, a Benefit Corporation, affording the corporation and its directors protection against liability to shareholders relating to the corporation’s pursuit of a beneficial purpose.
What is a Benefit Corporation?
A benefit corporation is a for-profit corporation that is authorized by a specific provision in its organizational documents to pursue one or more beneficial purposes in addition to the other legal purposes for which for-profit corporations may be formed. Benefit corporations do not receive any special government incentives to operate for a beneficial purpose (e.g., special tax treatment) and are subject to all the other requirements and limitations imposed by Ohio law on for-profit corporations.
What is Beneficial Purpose?
A beneficial purpose can be any purpose that has beneficial effects on persons, entities, communities, or interests, other than shareholders in their capacity as shareholders, including effects of an artistic, charitable, cultural, economic, educational, environmental, literary, medical, religious, scientific, or technological nature. Under the new law, benefit corporations and their directors are protected from liability to beneficiaries of a beneficial purpose and specifically owe no duty to such beneficiaries.
Ohio joins at least 31 other states that have adopted amendments to their respective corporation laws to provide for the creation of benefit corporations. Ohio’s proposed legislation differs from that adopted in some other states due to its flexibility. Some state laws require each benefit corporation to produce an annual public benefit report prepared against a third-party standard that describes how and to what extent the corporation has accomplished its beneficial purpose.
Senate Bill 21 gives shareholders the flexibility to determine what, if any, public reporting would be required. For example, the owners of a corner grocery store that operate for a profit may also approve cancer research as a beneficial purpose without being required to report publicly. However, a company wishing to attract investors who make investment decisions based on a beneficial purpose can provide for public reporting and auditing of the report.
In either circumstance, benefit corporations would still be required to produce annual financial statements (as required by O.R.C. §1701.38) for shareholders, and shareholders would still be entitled to examine the books and records of the corporation (as provided for in §1701.37(C)). The type of investor and the type of investment is changing. The new generation of investment wants to provide capital for corporations that combine a for-profit mentality while promoting a civic responsibility to the community.
Well-known examples of Benefit Corporations across the country include Kickstarter, Patagonia, Laureaute Education and King Arthur Flour Company.
To learn more about Benefit Corporations or any other matter pending before the Ohio General Assembly, contact a member of the firm’s Government Relations Practice Group.
Martha J. Sweterlitsch
at msweterlitsch@beneschlaw.com or 614.223.9367.
Rachel Winder at rwinder@beneschlaw.com or 614.223.9316.
Latest News
SCOTUS Rules That States May Limit Women’s and Girls’ Sports to Biological Females – Another Chapter in the Delicate Legislative Balance Between Title IX and the Equal Protection Clause
Key Takeaways I. Background and Procedural History The Supreme Court consolidated two cases challenging state laws that restrict participation in …
Is Florida the New Hot Jurisdiction for Defamation Cases?
Florida is emerging as a favorable venue for defamation lawsuits because its long-arm statute makes it easier to bring out-of-state publishers into court—but plaintiffs still must clear the same substantive legal hurdles once the case gets there.
Forced Labor Tariffs – Public Comments Due Next Week for USTR Section 301 Investigation
US importers have the opportunity to submit public comment on proposed tariffs that will utilize Section 301 as a means of addressing forced labor in global supply chains. Comments are due to the U.S. Trade Representative (“USTR”) by July 6, 2026.
Influencer Marketing Under Fire: Gymshark Sued in New Class Action as Plaintiffs Target Undisclosed Paid Endorsements
Key Takeaways Overview Brands that leverage social-media influencers to promote products face a rapidly growing litigation threat. Over the past …