Client Alerts & Insights
Ohio Proposes Act to Incentivize Consumer Data Security
November 21, 2017
Authored By:
The Proposed Act
Legislation was recently introduced in Ohio encouraging businesses to take steps in protecting consumer data. Ohio Senate Bill 220, The Data Protection Act (the “Act”), provides businesses that take certain commercially reasonable and industry standard data security measures, a safe harbor against legal claims upon a breach of consumer data. The Act does not set forth a minimum standard that needs to be met by businesses, but simply provides compliant businesses an affirmative defense against consumer claims that allege the failure to implement reasonable information security controls resulted in a data breach. The Act is intended to be an incentive and to encourage businesses to achieve a higher level of cybersecurity through voluntary action.
The safe harbor/affirmative defense applies to business that implement a cybersecurity program that complies with the National Institute of Standards and Technology (“NIST”) cybersecurity framework, or other industry recognized data security frameworks. The current bill sets forth the following industry standard, including certain industry specific, data security frameworks on which a business could base its data security program to be afforded safe harbor protection.
The eight frameworks include:
(1) NIST special publication 800-171;
(2) NIST special publications 800-53 and 800-53a;
(3) The federal risk and authorization management program;
(4) Center for internet security critical security controls; and
(5) International organization for standardization (ISO)/international electrotechnical commission 27000 family – information security management systems.
If the business is regulated by the state and the federal government, the following industry specific frameworks include:
(6) The security requirements of the “Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996,” as set forth in 45 CFR Part 164 Subpart C;
(7) Title V of the “Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999,” Public Law 106-102, as amended; and
(8) The “Federal Information Security Modernization Act of 2014,” Public Law 113-283.
The bill is currently pending committee assignment.
Recommendations
We recommend that each company immediately take steps to assess its collection of consumer data, and implement a comprehensive data security program and incident response plan to better protect itself in case of a security incident. The data security program should be modeled after one of the above referenced frameworks.
For further information, please contact Michael D. Stovsky, Partner, Benesch, Friedlander, Coplan & Aronoff LLP, 200 Public Square, Suite 2300, Cleveland, Ohio 44115, (216) 363-4626, or mstovsky@beneschlaw.com.
Latest News
Delaware Adopts Uniform Assignment for the Benefit of Creditors Act, Expanding Bankruptcy Alternative for Distressed Companies
Customs compliance and enforcement defense are high-profile exercises within U.S.-based importers due to the higher-risk regulatory enforcement environment. One of the more complex hot topics facing compliance and legal professionals within importers of record (IORs) is the degree to which “assists” impact dutiable value, and therefore duty burden, in the eyes of U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP).
Where AI Regulation Stands Today Part 2: State Attorneys General as the Primary AI Enforcers
Customs compliance and enforcement defense are high-profile exercises within U.S.-based importers due to the higher-risk regulatory enforcement environment. One of the more complex hot topics facing compliance and legal professionals within importers of record (IORs) is the degree to which “assists” impact dutiable value, and therefore duty burden, in the eyes of U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP).
Customs Duty Assists: Regulatory Compliance Overview and FAQ
Customs compliance and enforcement defense are high-profile exercises within U.S.-based importers due to the higher-risk regulatory enforcement environment. One of the more complex hot topics facing compliance and legal professionals within importers of record (IORs) is the degree to which “assists” impact dutiable value, and therefore duty burden, in the eyes of U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP).
TSA Authorized Representatives—Emerging Practice of Engaging Freight Brokers and Its Practical Implications
Air transportation safety has long been of critical supply chain importance and geopolitical significance, and that role is growing. Supply chain constraints over this decade have driven a need for adaptation, modal diversification and cost containment. To do so, authorized air cargo providers have increasingly explored new ways to add capacity for regulated surface transportation.