Client Alerts & Insights
Ohio Proposes Act to Incentivize Consumer Data Security
November 21, 2017
Authored By:
The Proposed Act
Legislation was recently introduced in Ohio encouraging businesses to take steps in protecting consumer data. Ohio Senate Bill 220, The Data Protection Act (the “Act”), provides businesses that take certain commercially reasonable and industry standard data security measures, a safe harbor against legal claims upon a breach of consumer data. The Act does not set forth a minimum standard that needs to be met by businesses, but simply provides compliant businesses an affirmative defense against consumer claims that allege the failure to implement reasonable information security controls resulted in a data breach. The Act is intended to be an incentive and to encourage businesses to achieve a higher level of cybersecurity through voluntary action.
The safe harbor/affirmative defense applies to business that implement a cybersecurity program that complies with the National Institute of Standards and Technology (“NIST”) cybersecurity framework, or other industry recognized data security frameworks. The current bill sets forth the following industry standard, including certain industry specific, data security frameworks on which a business could base its data security program to be afforded safe harbor protection.
The eight frameworks include:
(1) NIST special publication 800-171;
(2) NIST special publications 800-53 and 800-53a;
(3) The federal risk and authorization management program;
(4) Center for internet security critical security controls; and
(5) International organization for standardization (ISO)/international electrotechnical commission 27000 family – information security management systems.
If the business is regulated by the state and the federal government, the following industry specific frameworks include:
(6) The security requirements of the “Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996,” as set forth in 45 CFR Part 164 Subpart C;
(7) Title V of the “Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999,” Public Law 106-102, as amended; and
(8) The “Federal Information Security Modernization Act of 2014,” Public Law 113-283.
The bill is currently pending committee assignment.
Recommendations
We recommend that each company immediately take steps to assess its collection of consumer data, and implement a comprehensive data security program and incident response plan to better protect itself in case of a security incident. The data security program should be modeled after one of the above referenced frameworks.
For further information, please contact Michael D. Stovsky, Partner, Benesch, Friedlander, Coplan & Aronoff LLP, 200 Public Square, Suite 2300, Cleveland, Ohio 44115, (216) 363-4626, or mstovsky@beneschlaw.com.
Latest News
The Privacy Patchwork Grows: Alabama, Louisiana, Oklahoma, and Vermont Join the Compliance Landscape
Key Takeaways New Privacy Laws at a Glance State Effective Date Applies To Notable Features Louisiana January 1, 2027 Persons …
Governor Newsom Signs SB 690: California Eliminates Private Right of Action for Website Pen Register and Trap and Trace Claims Under CIPA
California businesses facing website-tracking litigation gained meaningful relief with SB 690. By eliminating the private right of action for online pen register and trap and trace claims—and applying the change retroactively to many pending cases—the law may significantly alter defense and settlement strategies.
California’s Ban on PFAS: The Law May Be Clear, but the Rules Are Not
California’s PFAS restrictions now extend beyond warning requirements to outright bans covering food packaging, juvenile products, cosmetics and textile articles. Manufacturers should determine whether any products sold in California are subject to these expanding requirements.
There’s Fifty New Sheriffs in Town: The Paramount-Warner Bros. Settlement and State Antitrust
A coalition of state attorneys general reached a settlement with Paramount Global and Skydance Media resolving antitrust challenges to the approximately $28 billion merger, which combined Paramount with Skydance Media.