Client Alerts & Insights
Ohio’s Logistics Laws Finally Enter the 21st Century
April 1, 2011
Authored By:
On March 30, 2011, Ohio Governor John Kasich signed House Bill 9, which permits Ohio to catch up with the rest of the country by modernizing the laws governing Ohio’s critical warehousing, transportation, and logistics industries. Specifically, the legislation revised Article 7 of Ohio’s version of the Uniform Commercial Code (“UCC Article 7”). UCC Article 7 is the lifeblood of the warehousing, transportation, and logistics industry. Among other things, UCC Article 7 defines what constitutes a document of title, allocates the commercial risk of loss if goods are damaged or lost, and governs the circumstances under which warehouse operators and trucking companies can place a lien on inventory or goods being transported.
These revisions to UCC Article 7 were vital for a number of reasons.
First, the revised UCC Article 7 harmonizes Ohio law with current commercial practices. UCC Article 7 has not been revised since 1951. A great deal has happened since that time with respect to the storage and transportation of goods. For instance, over the past twenty (20) years, commercial parties have begun to use electronic warehouse receipts and electronic bills of lading. While these mechanisms are currently used in practice, they were not expressly addressed under Ohio law. The revised UCC Article 7 unequivocally recognizes and governs electronic documents of title. Therefore, the revised UCC Article 7 promotes economic activity in Ohio by permitting those who wish to do business in Ohio to do so with greater predictability and security.
Second, the revised UCC Article 7 updates antiquated means of limiting liability. For instance, the former UCC Article 7 required parties to limit liability by setting forth a specific liability “per article or item” or “value per unit of weight” on a warehouse receipt. Therefore, contractual limitations of liability that use other reference points (such as a multiple of the storage costs, multiples of pallets or containers, etc.) were arguably ineffective. In short, the revised UCC Article 7 permits parties to agree to a limitation of liability that is expressed in plain and practical language rather than through formulaic, boilerplate text.
Third, the revised UCC Article 7 broadens the circumstances under which a warehouse operator or a trucking company may impose a lien on property in its custody. Under existing Ohio law, a warehouse operator only has a lien on inventory if certain language appears on its warehouse receipt. However, the revised UCC Article 7 permits liens to be created by the plain language of a storage agreement. In other words, commercial parties will now more readily understand the circumstances under which a lien will be effective.
Of course, the revised UCC Article 7 addresses a number of other substantive and non-substantive changes to the law as well. The law becomes effective on June 29, 2011.
In summary, the revised UCC Article 7 will substantially benefit both the providers of warehousing and transportation services as well as the users of such services by improving the predictability of the business environment in Ohio in general. Companies located outside of Ohio need to know what rules will apply if their goods are stored or transported in Ohio. Moreover, companies located in Ohio need to be able to operate in an environment where the law accurately reflects commercial reality.
Forty (40) states have adopted the revised UCC Article 7 and similar efforts to update the law are underway in a variety of others states. Ohio has finally caught up with the rest of the country.
* Marc Blubaugh, Co-Chair of Benesch’s Transportation & Logistics Practice Group, was instrumental in the effort to enact revised UCC Article 7 in Ohio.
Additional Information
For additional information on this topic, please contact:
Marc S. Blubaugh at (614) 223-9382 or mblubaugh@beneschlaw.com
Martha Payne at (541) 764-2859 or mpayne@beneschlaw.com
Richard A. Plewacki at (216) 363-4159 or rplewacki@beneschlaw.com
Eric L. Zalud at (216) 363-4178 or ezalud@beneschlaw.com
Latest News
SCOTUS Rules That States May Limit Women’s and Girls’ Sports to Biological Females – Another Chapter in the Delicate Legislative Balance Between Title IX and the Equal Protection Clause
Key Takeaways I. Background and Procedural History The Supreme Court consolidated two cases challenging state laws that restrict participation in …
Is Florida the New Hot Jurisdiction for Defamation Cases?
Florida is emerging as a favorable venue for defamation lawsuits because its long-arm statute makes it easier to bring out-of-state publishers into court—but plaintiffs still must clear the same substantive legal hurdles once the case gets there.
Forced Labor Tariffs – Public Comments Due Next Week for USTR Section 301 Investigation
US importers have the opportunity to submit public comment on proposed tariffs that will utilize Section 301 as a means of addressing forced labor in global supply chains. Comments are due to the U.S. Trade Representative (“USTR”) by July 6, 2026.
Influencer Marketing Under Fire: Gymshark Sued in New Class Action as Plaintiffs Target Undisclosed Paid Endorsements
Key Takeaways Overview Brands that leverage social-media influencers to promote products face a rapidly growing litigation threat. Over the past …