Client Alerts & Insights

OSHA Provides New Guidance on Reporting COVID-19 Hospitalizations and Deaths

October 5, 2020

Authored By:

OSHA released its latest guidance on when employers must notify it of workers being hospitalized or dying because of COVID-19. The new guidelines provide the following changes for reporting purposes:

Hospitalization

Prior guidance stated that hospitalization must be reported within 24 hours of diagnosis.
New guidance states that hospitalization must be reported within 24 hours from the on-the-job exposure and hospitalization.

Fatality

Prior guidance stated fatality must be reported if it occurs within 30 days of diagnosis.
New guidance states fatality must be reported if it occurs within 30 days from on-the-job exposure.

In essence, employers now need to determine the date and time of exposure, not diagnosis. Additionally, if a fatality occurs due to the on-the-job exposure, employers must notify OSHA within eight hours of knowing both that the employee has died, and that the cause of death was a work-related case of COVID-19.

The above reporting requirements apply to reporting only, not recordkeeping. However, employers should nevertheless ensure that they comply with OSHA’s recordkeeping requirements. The OSHA 300 Log must be updated and an OSHA 301 Report must be completed upon receipt of notice that an employee suffered a work-related COVID-19 illness, which would typically require days away from work.

OSHA’s latest guidance applies to employers subject to federal OSHA standards. Employers with operations in states with their own safety and health agencies and regulations should review their state requirements. Employers who have questions regarding their OSHA reporting or recordkeeping requirements should consult with their attorneys or safety consultants.

If you have any questions, we encourage you to reach out to your Benesch contact or one of the attorneys below to discuss.

Joseph N. Gross at jgross@beneschlaw.com or 216.363.4163.

Joseph R. Blalock at jblalock@beneschlaw.com or 614.223.9359.

Brad Wenclewicz at bwenclewicz@beneschlaw.com or 216.363.6191

***

Please note that this information is current as of the date of this Client Alert, based on the available data. However, because COVID-19’s status and updates related to the same are ongoing, we recommend real-time review of guidance distributed by the CDC and local officials.

Latest News

Client Alerts & Insights 6.3.26

Ohio Board of Professional Conduct Issues Ohio Ethics Guide on Artificial Intelligence for Lawyers and Judicial Officers

Dispensary tip practices—especially involving hybrid roles like “Leads” or Agents-in-Charge—are increasingly being scrutinized as unlawful as a surge in wage-and-hour lawsuits claim that managers or employees with supervisory duties are improperly sharing in tips meant for front-line staff.

Client Alerts & Insights 6.3.26

Connecticut Broadens Data Privacy Act Requirements Effective July 1, 2026

Key Takeaways Revised Applicability Scope and Exemptions Effective July 1, 2026, the CTDPA’s existing applicability thresholds are reduced, resulting in …

Client Alerts & Insights 5.29.26

SCOTUS Extends FAA Exemption to Last-Mile Drivers: What the Flowers Foods decision means for motor carriers and transportation providers

On May 28, 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a unanimous decision in Flowers Foods, Inc. v. Brock, expanding reach of the Federal Arbitration Act’s (“FAA”) Section 1 exemption for transportation workers engaged in interstate commerce. The Court held that a worker who transports goods on an intrastate leg of an interstate journey can qualify for Section 1’s exemption without crossing state lines or interacting with vehicles that do. This decision has significant implications for motor carriers and transportation providers that rely on arbitration agreements to resolve disputes with independent contractors and employee drivers.

Client Alerts & Insights 5.29.26

Beyond the Buzzwords: State AGs Put Enforcement Muscle Behind Algorithmic Pricing and Age Verification Crackdowns

State AGs are doubling down—across party lines—on consumer protection, with a sharp focus on vulnerable groups and increased scrutiny of algorithmic pricing models and online age verification practices.

View news and insights