Client Alerts & Insights
Pay Disparity Takes Center Stage with New Legislation
May 24, 2019
Authored By:
On May 22, 2019, Colorado Governor Jared Polis signed into law the Equal Pay for Equal Work Act. The Act, first proposed nearly 40 years ago, will take effect on January 1, 2021.
The Act prohibits employers from inquiring about or considering the wage/salary history of an applicant for purposes of determining their rate of pay, and prohibits discrimination against an applicant for refusing to disclose his or her wage/salary history. Additionally, the Act permits employees to freely discuss wages with their colleagues and employers, and prohibits employers from retaliating or discriminating against employees for doing so.
Employers are also prohibited from paying employees of different genders different wage rates for “substantially similar work,” regardless of job title. For purposes of the Act, substantially similar work is based on a composite of skill, effort, and responsibility. Notwithstanding the foregoing, wage rate differentials are permitted when based on: (i) a seniority system; (ii) a merit system; (iii) a system that measures earnings based on quantity or quality of production; (iv) the geographic location of the employees; (v) education, training, or experience related to the work in question; or (vi) travel, if necessary for the work in question. The Act places the burden on the employer to demonstrate: the permissible basis for any wage differential, the reasonable application of such factor(s), that such factor(s) account for the entire wage differential, and that prior wage rate history was not considered.
As mentioned above, the Act permits employees to discuss wages in the workplace. It also grants employees a private right of action to sue employers, rather than a lengthy administrative process, required by the current law. Further still, the Act requires employers to announce and/or post all opportunities for advancement to all current employees prior to making a promotion decision, and for each job posting, requires employers to disclose the rate or range of compensation and a description of all benefits to be offered. In this regard, Colorado follows Washington as the latest jurisdiction to impose affirmative responsibilities on employers relating to disclosure of compensation.
Before the Act takes effect, employers should review all job applications and applicable pay scales for compliance with the Act.
For more information on this topic, please contact a member of the firm’s Labor & Employment Practice Group.
Margo Wolf O’Donnell at modonnell@beneschlaw.com or 312.212.4982.
Latest News
Course of Performance as Contract Amendment or Waiver: When Business Practices Overrides Paper Terms
Imagine you are a leading manufacturing company, and you purchase a critical widget from a supplier. You have a carefully negotiated contract in place—one that spells out specific pricing, delivery timelines, and product specifications for those widgets.
California AG’s Carbon Health Settlement Raises the Stakes for MSO-PC Structures and Continuity Planning in California
The California Attorney General’s June 2026 settlement with Carbon Health marks the first-of-its kind resolution of an enforcement action directly targeting an MSO-PC structure under California’s corporate practice of medicine (“CPOM”) doctrine.
Supply Chain Security – C-TPAT Program Growing in Significance for U.S. Operations
Geopolitical challenges are triggering executive-level focus on supply chain security across industrial sectors and transportation service providers, including renewed interest in the Customs-Trade Partnership against Terrorism (“C-TPAT”) program.
BREAKING: Seventh Circuit Holds Text Messages are not Telephone Calls Under Section 227(c)(5) of the TCPA
In a significant post-Loper Bright win for defendants, the Seventh Circuit issued its decision in Steidinger v. Blackstone Medical Services, No. 25-2398, affirming a trial court ruling that “§ 227(c)(5) [of the TCPA] does not permit plaintiffs to sue for the receipt of unwanted texts . . . .”