The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has changed its rules governing continuing applications and Requests for Continued Examination (RCE). According to the USPTO, the changes will allow it to conduct a better and more thorough and reliable examination of patent applications. The new rules should prompt patent applicants to examine their portfolios and determine whether they should take any action before the new rules take effect on November 1, 2007.
The new rules will not have any effect on the applicant’s ability to file continuing applications before they take effect. On or after November 1, the new rules will limit applicants to two continuing applications (e.g., continuations or continuations-in-part) and a single RCE in any one application family. Applicants seeking to file additional applications exceeding these limits must petition the USPTO and show that the additional application or RCE is justified.
These new limits are a significant departure from the USPTO’s prior rules governing continuing applications and RCEs. However, the USPTO has adopted policies for the transition that will provide applicants some reprieve. The USPTO’s “one more” policy will allow applicants to file an additional continuing application, even after November 1, without requiring a petition and showing, so long as the initial application was filed prior to August 21, 2007. Any continuations or continuations-in-part filed between August 21 and November 1 will exhaust the “one more” application allowance.
The figure below illustrates the application of this policy. The initial application (I) and two continuations (C) were filed prior to August 21, 2007. The applicant is therefore permitted “one more” continuation or continuation-in-part without petition. In this example, the “one more” application was filed prior to November 1, 2007, but note that it may have been filed after that date without a petition and showing. As a result of filing the additional application, the applicant exhausted the “one more” application allowance. Any subsequent continuation application (P) requires the appropriate petition and showing.
If you have any questions about the USPTO’s rules, or their effect on your patent portfolio, please contact the Intellectual Property Group at Benesch Friedlander Coplan & Aronoff LLP.
Latest News
SCOTUS Rules That States May Limit Women’s and Girls’ Sports to Biological Females – Another Chapter in the Delicate Legislative Balance Between Title IX and the Equal Protection Clause
Key Takeaways I. Background and Procedural History The Supreme Court consolidated two cases challenging state laws that restrict participation in …
Is Florida the New Hot Jurisdiction for Defamation Cases?
Florida is emerging as a favorable venue for defamation lawsuits because its long-arm statute makes it easier to bring out-of-state publishers into court—but plaintiffs still must clear the same substantive legal hurdles once the case gets there.
Forced Labor Tariffs – Public Comments Due Next Week for USTR Section 301 Investigation
US importers have the opportunity to submit public comment on proposed tariffs that will utilize Section 301 as a means of addressing forced labor in global supply chains. Comments are due to the U.S. Trade Representative (“USTR”) by July 6, 2026.
Influencer Marketing Under Fire: Gymshark Sued in New Class Action as Plaintiffs Target Undisclosed Paid Endorsements
Key Takeaways Overview Brands that leverage social-media influencers to promote products face a rapidly growing litigation threat. Over the past …