Client Alerts & Insights
Real Property Tax Valuation “Complaint Against the Valuation of Property” Filing Deadline: March 31, 2006
February 28, 2006
Every six years each County Auditor’s office must re-appraise the fair market value of all property within its boundaries. Calendar year 2005 was such a re-appraisal year. If a party decides to contest an Auditor’s value, whether seeking an increase or a decrease in the fair market value of their property, then a “Complaint Against the Valuation of Property” must be filed. The deadline for filing is March 31, 2006. The effective period of the Complaint is for the preceding tax year. The reason for this is property taxes are collected in arrears. When a complaint is filed, it is filed with that county’s Board of Revision (“BOR”), which is a quasi-judicial body authorized by statute to preside over the allegations made in the Complaint. The BOR is typically located in the same offices as the county Auditor.
An increase or reduction in fair market value directly correlates to an increase or decrease in property taxes. If a Complaint is not filed by the March 31 deadline, then the property owner cannot seek redress for that applicable tax year at a later date. There are three primary methods for establishing and/or challenging the value of real property: 1) cost approach, 2) market approach 3) income approach. The use of each method or a combination is dependent upon multiple factors, but typically can be determined by use of the subject property; the use of the property is not limited to municipal zoning classifications, but rather, actual day-today use. In order to support any of the three methods, evidence must be used that can be comprised of testimony, whether lay or expert, financial data, appraisals, or other demonstrative exhibits or empirical data.
For more information regarding this filing, please contact James Ervin at 614-223-9352 or jervin@bfca.com or T.C. Couhig at 216-363-4541 or tcouhig@bfca.com.
Latest News
Emerging Enforcement Trends in Digital Health Data Privacy: Lessons from Washington’s My Health My Data, FTC vs. Hims & Hers and UCHealth Enforcement Actions
Regulators and private plaintiffs are increasingly scrutinizing how healthcare, digital health and consumer-facing companies collect, share and protect health-related data, particularly through website tracking technologies and third-party vendor relationships.
Navigating Price Risk in Long-Term Vendor Contracts: Drafting Strategies and Adjustment Mechanisms for an Uncertain Market
In today’s environment of tariff uncertainty, inflation, supply chain disruptions, and shifting labor costs, long-term vendor contracts that rely on fixed pricing can quickly become misaligned with economic reality, turning a fixed-price contract from a competitive advantage into a financial burden if pricing risks are not addressed upfront.
OFCCP Publishes Final Rule Rescinding Affirmative Action Regulations Pursuant to Executive Order 11246
The U.S. Department of Labor’s Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (“OFCCP”) published a Final Rule on August 21, 2026, …
The Coming State-Law Litigation Wave of 2026-27: “Subscription Trap” Class Actions
The subscription economy keeps growing—and so does the wave of class-action litigation targeting it. While the FTC’s regulatory efforts have drawn headlines, private class actions under state laws pose an even greater exposure risk.