Client Alerts & Insights
Real Property Tax Valuation “Complaint Against the Valuation of Property” Filing Deadline: March 31, 2006
February 28, 2006
Every six years each County Auditor’s office must re-appraise the fair market value of all property within its boundaries. Calendar year 2005 was such a re-appraisal year. If a party decides to contest an Auditor’s value, whether seeking an increase or a decrease in the fair market value of their property, then a “Complaint Against the Valuation of Property” must be filed. The deadline for filing is March 31, 2006. The effective period of the Complaint is for the preceding tax year. The reason for this is property taxes are collected in arrears. When a complaint is filed, it is filed with that county’s Board of Revision (“BOR”), which is a quasi-judicial body authorized by statute to preside over the allegations made in the Complaint. The BOR is typically located in the same offices as the county Auditor.
An increase or reduction in fair market value directly correlates to an increase or decrease in property taxes. If a Complaint is not filed by the March 31 deadline, then the property owner cannot seek redress for that applicable tax year at a later date. There are three primary methods for establishing and/or challenging the value of real property: 1) cost approach, 2) market approach 3) income approach. The use of each method or a combination is dependent upon multiple factors, but typically can be determined by use of the subject property; the use of the property is not limited to municipal zoning classifications, but rather, actual day-today use. In order to support any of the three methods, evidence must be used that can be comprised of testimony, whether lay or expert, financial data, appraisals, or other demonstrative exhibits or empirical data.
For more information regarding this filing, please contact James Ervin at 614-223-9352 or jervin@bfca.com or T.C. Couhig at 216-363-4541 or tcouhig@bfca.com.
Latest News
Delaware Adopts Uniform Assignment for the Benefit of Creditors Act, Expanding Bankruptcy Alternative for Distressed Companies
Customs compliance and enforcement defense are high-profile exercises within U.S.-based importers due to the higher-risk regulatory enforcement environment. One of the more complex hot topics facing compliance and legal professionals within importers of record (IORs) is the degree to which “assists” impact dutiable value, and therefore duty burden, in the eyes of U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP).
Where AI Regulation Stands Today Part 2: State Attorneys General as the Primary AI Enforcers
Customs compliance and enforcement defense are high-profile exercises within U.S.-based importers due to the higher-risk regulatory enforcement environment. One of the more complex hot topics facing compliance and legal professionals within importers of record (IORs) is the degree to which “assists” impact dutiable value, and therefore duty burden, in the eyes of U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP).
Customs Duty Assists: Regulatory Compliance Overview and FAQ
Customs compliance and enforcement defense are high-profile exercises within U.S.-based importers due to the higher-risk regulatory enforcement environment. One of the more complex hot topics facing compliance and legal professionals within importers of record (IORs) is the degree to which “assists” impact dutiable value, and therefore duty burden, in the eyes of U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP).
TSA Authorized Representatives—Emerging Practice of Engaging Freight Brokers and Its Practical Implications
Air transportation safety has long been of critical supply chain importance and geopolitical significance, and that role is growing. Supply chain constraints over this decade have driven a need for adaptation, modal diversification and cost containment. To do so, authorized air cargo providers have increasingly explored new ways to add capacity for regulated surface transportation.