Client Alerts & Insights
Real Property Tax Valuation “Complaint Against the Valuation of Property” Filing Deadline: March 31, 2006
February 28, 2006
Every six years each County Auditor’s office must re-appraise the fair market value of all property within its boundaries. Calendar year 2005 was such a re-appraisal year. If a party decides to contest an Auditor’s value, whether seeking an increase or a decrease in the fair market value of their property, then a “Complaint Against the Valuation of Property” must be filed. The deadline for filing is March 31, 2006. The effective period of the Complaint is for the preceding tax year. The reason for this is property taxes are collected in arrears. When a complaint is filed, it is filed with that county’s Board of Revision (“BOR”), which is a quasi-judicial body authorized by statute to preside over the allegations made in the Complaint. The BOR is typically located in the same offices as the county Auditor.
An increase or reduction in fair market value directly correlates to an increase or decrease in property taxes. If a Complaint is not filed by the March 31 deadline, then the property owner cannot seek redress for that applicable tax year at a later date. There are three primary methods for establishing and/or challenging the value of real property: 1) cost approach, 2) market approach 3) income approach. The use of each method or a combination is dependent upon multiple factors, but typically can be determined by use of the subject property; the use of the property is not limited to municipal zoning classifications, but rather, actual day-today use. In order to support any of the three methods, evidence must be used that can be comprised of testimony, whether lay or expert, financial data, appraisals, or other demonstrative exhibits or empirical data.
For more information regarding this filing, please contact James Ervin at 614-223-9352 or jervin@bfca.com or T.C. Couhig at 216-363-4541 or tcouhig@bfca.com.
Latest News
HHS OIG Sends a Strong Warning to State Medicaid Fraud Control Units: Signals Aggressive Federal Oversight of State Medicaid Fraud Enforcement
On May 13, 2026, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General (“HHS OIG”) sent a letter to the Attorneys General of every state warning that the federal government will impose strict compliance requirements on the state’s Medicaid Fraud Control Unit (“MFCU”).
CMS Imposes Nationwide Moratorium on Home Health Agency and Hospice Enrollments
The Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) remains active on both investigative and litigation fronts. Associate Director Lee emphasized that investor protection continues to be the agency’s central mandate, with enforcement efforts concentrated on misrepresentation and disclosure failures, market manipulation, insider trading and fraud using artificial intelligence.
Word on the Street: Insights from Federal Enforcement Leaders in the Northern District of California
The Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) remains active on both investigative and litigation fronts. Associate Director Lee emphasized that investor protection continues to be the agency’s central mandate, with enforcement efforts concentrated on misrepresentation and disclosure failures, market manipulation, insider trading and fraud using artificial intelligence.
DOJ Strikes Again: Healthcare Fraud Enforcement Escalates as DOJ Deploys West Coast Strike Force
On April 30, 2026, the U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”) announced the creation of the West Coast Health Care Fraud Strike Force (the “Strike Force”), a new multidistrict enforcement initiative targeting healthcare fraud schemes across Arizona, Nevada, and Northern California.