Client Alerts & Insights
Reminder: New Standard Contractual Clauses Took Effect on Sept. 27
October 14, 2021
Authored By:
Contracts entered into prior to Sept. 27 will need to be amended to adopt the new standard contractual clauses by Dec. 27, 2022.
As of Sept. 27, entities entering new contracts that are subject to the General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”) must use the European Commission’s updated Standard Contractual Clauses (“SCCs”).
From this point forward, the E.U. expects entities to use the following two sets of SCCs. First, if an entity is involved in the international transfer of data from the European Economic Area (“EEA”), they must use the SCCs linked here. Second, if an entity is involved in the transfer of data within the EEA, they must use the SCCs linked here.
Contracts entered into prior to Sept. 27 may continue to rely on the old SCCs, but only until late next year. Such contracts that continue to rely on the old SCCs must replace them with the new SCCs by Dec. 27, 2022.
Background and Context
This past summer, the European Commission updated their SCCs to better align with the E.U.’s GDPR and address the post Schrems II legal landscape.
In Schrems II, the Court of Justice of the European Union famously struck down the E.U. – U.S. Privacy Shield. The Court also called into question the validity of the old SCCs. To address the concerns the Court raised, the European Commission adopted the new SCCs.
The first set of new SCCs are familiar as they relate to the traditional transfer of personal data from geographic locations in the EEA to geographic locations outside of the EEA. The second set of new SCCs are brand new, and specifically cover the engagement of data processors in the EEA when there is no transfer of data to a geographic location outside of the EEA. See our earlier, more in-depth analysis of how the SCCs changed here.
As the transatlantic regulatory structure continues to develop and the obligations your business is required to take on change or grow, the Benesch Data Protection and Privacy team is committed to staying at the forefront of knowledge and experience to assist our clients in compliance efforts. We are available to assist you with any compliance needs.
Ryan T. Sulkin at rsulkin@beneschlaw.com or 312.624.6398.
Lucas Schaetzel at lschaetzel@beneschlaw.com or 312.212.4977.
Latest News
U.S. Trade Fraud Task Force Surpasses $1 Billion in Recoveries, Signaling Heightened Customs Enforcement
The Department of Justice (DOJ) announced a new inter-agency Trade Fraud Task Force (“Task Force”), designed to “aggressively pursue enforcement actions against any parties who seek to evade tariffs and other duties” and those who attempt to import prohibited goods following the DOJ’s identification of trade and customs fraud as a priority for prosecution.
Major Shift in Federal Labor Board’s Position on Restrictive Covenants
Non-compete agreements are no longer considered presumptively illegal under federal labor law. On June 26, 2026, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) released advice memoranda signaling this dramatic change in how the federal government views non-compete agreements in the workplace. This is welcome news for employers who use non-competes and similar restrictive covenants to protect their businesses.
Course of Performance as Contract Amendment or Waiver: When Business Practices Overrides Paper Terms
Imagine you are a leading manufacturing company, and you purchase a critical widget from a supplier. You have a carefully negotiated contract in place—one that spells out specific pricing, delivery timelines, and product specifications for those widgets.
California AG’s Carbon Health Settlement Raises the Stakes for MSO-PC Structures and Continuity Planning in California
The California Attorney General’s June 2026 settlement with Carbon Health marks the first-of-its kind resolution of an enforcement action directly targeting an MSO-PC structure under California’s corporate practice of medicine (“CPOM”) doctrine.