Client Alerts & Insights
SEC Proposes Rules for Disclosure of Hedging by Employees, Officers, and Directors
February 13, 2015
Boards of Directors of companies subject to the federal proxy rules should take note of proposed rules released by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on February 9, 2015 that would enhance corporate disclosure of company hedging policies for directors and employees, including officers.
The proposed rules would implement Section 955 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, which requires the disclosure of company hedging policies applicable to employees and directors. Congress intended Section 955 to provide transparency to shareholders regarding employees’ or directors’ permission to engage in transactions that mitigate or avoid the incentive alignment associated with equity ownership.
The rules as proposed would require companies to disclose whether directors, officers, and other employees are permitted to hedge or offset any decrease in the market value of the company’s or a related entity’s equity securities that were granted by the company as compensation or are otherwise held, directly or indirectly, by employees or directors. Disclosure would apply to equity securities of the company, the company’s parent or subsidiary, or any subsidiary of any parent of the company that is registered under Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act).
The proposed rules would apply to all companies that are subject to the federal proxy rules, including smaller reporting companies, emerging growth companies, business development companies, and registered closed-end investment companies with shares listed and registered on a national securities exchange.
Disclosure would be required in a proxy statement or information statement relating to the election of directors.
Importantly, the proposed rules would only require disclosure of a company’s hedging policy, if such a policy exists. The rules would not require a company to prohibit hedging transactions, or to otherwise adopt practices or a policy addressing hedging by any category of individuals.
If you have any questions about the SEC proposed rules for hedging disclosure, please contact an attorney in Benesch’s Corporate & Securities Practice Group.
Megan L. Mehalko at mmehalko@beneschlaw.com or 216.363.4487
Douglas E. Haas at dhaas@beneschlaw.com or 216.363.4602
Corey R. Sparks at csparks@beneschlaw.com or 216.363.4632
Latest News
CMS Proposes Sweeping Restrictions on Remote Patient Monitoring: The Outsourcing Ban, Reimbursement Revaluation and Potential Code Consolidation in the CY 2027 Physician Fee Schedule Proposed Rule
CMS’s CY 2027 Proposed Rule would significantly restrict Medicare reimbursement for Remote Patient Monitoring (RPM) and Remote Therapeutic Monitoring (RTM), including banning outsourced clinical staffing, adding new patient-relationship and initiating-visit requirements, reducing certain reimbursement rates, and exploring consolidation of existing billing codes.
Canada Trade – New Tariff Announcement and USMCA Non-Renewable Stakes for North American Supply Chains
On July 20, 2026, the Trump Administration announced a new set of sweeping tariffs on Canadian goods. This comes less than one month after the United States decided against renewing the free trade agreement between the United States of America, Mexico, and Canada (the “USMCA”) during the required six-year joint review.
Colorado Enacts Comprehensive Licensing Requirements for Applied Behavior Analysis Practitioners and Clinics
Key Takeaways On June 2, 2026, Colorado’s governor signed House Bill 26-1425 into law, establishing the Applied Behavior Analysis Practice …
Section 301 Duties for Forced Labor – Step 3 in IEEPA Replacement and its Impact
The White House initiated its third step in replacing IEEPA tariffs on Friday, July 24. Specifically, the U.S. Trade Representative (“USTR”) published final Section 301 findings and duty rates for imports from 30 countries following its investigation of harms on the domestic industry due to forced labor in those countries’ supply chains.