Client Alerts & Insights
Severson Stands: Long-Term Leaves of Absence are No Longer Reasonable Accommodations Under the ADA
April 6, 2018
Management-side attorneys and their clients can breathe a sigh of relief after the Supreme Court declined to take up a challenge to the Seventh Circuit’s ruling in Severson v. Heartland Woodcraft, Inc. 872 F.3d 476 (7th Cir. 2017). In Severson, the Seventh Circuit clarified employers’ obligations under the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) when it ruled that multi-month leaves of absence are not reasonable accommodations.
A brief summary: Heartland Woodcraft terminated Mr. Severson after he did not return to work from a 12-week medical leave of absence under the Family Medical Leave Act and, instead, requested an additional two to three months of leave. Mr. Severson sued, alleging that Heartland Woodcraft violated the ADA by failing to reasonably accommodate his disability. The Seventh Circuit upheld summary judgment for Heartland Woodcraft, finding that a long term medical leave of absence falls outside of the scope of a reasonable accommodation because it does not enable an employee to work, but instead “excuses his not working.” The court left open the possibility that “intermittent time off or a short leave—say, a couple of days, or even a couple of weeks—may, in appropriate circumstances, be analogous to a part-time or modified work schedule.”
What does this mean?: With the denial of Mr. Severson’s petition for writ of certiorari, the Seventh Circuit’s per se rule that a long-term leave of absence cannot be a reasonable accommodation stands. While employers in Illinois, Indiana and Wisconsin should still engage in the interactive process when receiving employee requests for accommodation and look for accommodations that will allow the employee to do his or her job, this means that employers no longer need to guess at how long they are obligated to hold a job open for an absent employee.
For more information on this topic, please contact a member of Benesch’s Labor & Employment Practice Group:
Eric Baisden at ebaisden@beneschlaw.com or 216.363.4676.
Margo Wolf O’Donnell at modonnell@beneschlaw.com or 312.212.4982.
Latest News
HHS OIG Sends a Strong Warning to State Medicaid Fraud Control Units: Signals Aggressive Federal Oversight of State Medicaid Fraud Enforcement
On May 13, 2026, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General (“HHS OIG”) sent a letter to the Attorneys General of every state warning that the federal government will impose strict compliance requirements on the state’s Medicaid Fraud Control Unit (“MFCU”).
CMS Imposes Nationwide Moratorium on Home Health Agency and Hospice Enrollments
The Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) remains active on both investigative and litigation fronts. Associate Director Lee emphasized that investor protection continues to be the agency’s central mandate, with enforcement efforts concentrated on misrepresentation and disclosure failures, market manipulation, insider trading and fraud using artificial intelligence.
Word on the Street: Insights from Federal Enforcement Leaders in the Northern District of California
The Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) remains active on both investigative and litigation fronts. Associate Director Lee emphasized that investor protection continues to be the agency’s central mandate, with enforcement efforts concentrated on misrepresentation and disclosure failures, market manipulation, insider trading and fraud using artificial intelligence.
DOJ Strikes Again: Healthcare Fraud Enforcement Escalates as DOJ Deploys West Coast Strike Force
On April 30, 2026, the U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”) announced the creation of the West Coast Health Care Fraud Strike Force (the “Strike Force”), a new multidistrict enforcement initiative targeting healthcare fraud schemes across Arizona, Nevada, and Northern California.