Client Alerts & Insights
Supreme Court Hears Arguments on Atlantic Coast Pipeline
February 25, 2020
On February 24, 2020, the U.S. Supreme Court heard arguments on a critical permit needed for completion of the Atlantic Coast Pipeline, a controversial natural gas pipeline crossing the Appalachian Trail. Supporters of the pipeline, including Solicitor General Noel Francisco for the Trump Administration, argued that the U.S. Forest Service has jurisdiction over land in the George Washington National Forest, where a 0.1-mile segment of the pipeline would cross hundreds of feet beneath the Appalachian Trail. The consolidated cases are U.S. Forest Service v. Cowpasture River Assn. and Atlantic Coast Pipeline LLC v. Cowpasture River Assn.[1]
Background:
Pipeline developers Dominion Energy and Duke Energy asked the Supreme Court to reverse a 2018 Fourth Circuit decision which held that the Forest Service lacked statutory authority to grant a pipeline right of way across the Appalachian Trail.
In Cowpasture River Preservation Assoc. v. Forest Service,[2] the Fourth Circuit reasoned that the Mineral Leasing Act – a 1920 federal law that governs rights of way through federal land for oil and gas pipelines – allows rights of way for pipelines on federal land, except for land in the National Park System. The Court noted that the 1968 National Trails System Act (the “Trails Act”) had transferred more than 1,000 miles of lands crossed by the Appalachian Trail to the National Park System, and that such lands are not subject to rights of way under the Mineral Leasing Act, unlike other federal lands. Because the Court considered the Appalachian Trail to be a unit of the National Park System, it held that the Forest Service lacked the authority to approve the right of way and accordingly vacated the Special Use Permit and Record of Decision granting the right of way for construction of the Atlantic Coast Pipeline.
Issue and Main Arguments:
The issue before the Supreme Court is whether the U.S. Forest Service has the authority to grant rights of way under the Mineral Leasing Act through lands traversed by the Appalachian Trail within national forests.[3]
Led by Dominion Energy, appellants argued that the Trails Act did not transfer lands crossed by the Appalachian Trail to the National Park System. The Atlantic Coast Pipeline developers maintain that the Park Service is charged with overall administration of the Appalachian Trail, but the actual lands traversed by the Appalachian Trail within national forests remain under the jurisdiction of the Forest Service. As such, the U.S. Forest Service has the authority to grant the necessary rights of way. Appellants asserted, “there is no basis in any federal statute to conclude that Congress intended to convert the Appalachian Trail into a 2,200-mile barrier separating critical natural resources from the eastern seaboard.”[4]
Respondents, including the Sierra Club and other environmental groups opposing construction of the Atlantic Coast Pipeline, argued that no federal agency can grant rights of way for the Atlantic Coast Pipeline because the Appalachian Trail is part of the National Park System and therefore only Congress can approve the crossing.[5]
Significance:
The Supreme Court’s decision should clarify the authority of the U.S. Forest Service to grant pipeline easements that cross the Appalachian Trail and may ultimately determine if the Atlantic Coast Pipeline will be completed. Construction of the $8 billion pipeline project has been delayed for more than a year due to legal disputes.
For more information on this topic, contact a member of Benesch’s Energy Practice Group.
[1] https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/18-1584.html
[2] The Fourth Circuit opinion is available here: https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/18-1584-18-1587-opinion-below.pdf
[3] https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/united-states-forest-service-v-cowpasture-river-preservation-association/
[4]See Appellants’ Opening Brief at 2, available at https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/18/18-1584/124078/20191202141517431_18-1587%20Atlantic%20Coast%20Pipeline%20Opening%20Brief.pdf
[5] https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/virginia-politics/us-supreme-court-to-decide-winner-in-case-of-gas-pipeline-vs-appalachian-trail/2020/02/23/d3ead098-5334-11ea-929a-64efa7482a77_story.html
Latest News
CMS Proposes Sweeping Restrictions on Remote Patient Monitoring: The Outsourcing Ban, Reimbursement Revaluation and Potential Code Consolidation in the CY 2027 Physician Fee Schedule Proposed Rule
CMS’s CY 2027 Proposed Rule would significantly restrict Medicare reimbursement for Remote Patient Monitoring (RPM) and Remote Therapeutic Monitoring (RTM), including banning outsourced clinical staffing, adding new patient-relationship and initiating-visit requirements, reducing certain reimbursement rates, and exploring consolidation of existing billing codes.
Canada Trade – New Tariff Announcement and USMCA Non-Renewable Stakes for North American Supply Chains
On July 20, 2026, the Trump Administration announced a new set of sweeping tariffs on Canadian goods. This comes less than one month after the United States decided against renewing the free trade agreement between the United States of America, Mexico, and Canada (the “USMCA”) during the required six-year joint review.
Section 301 Duties for Forced Labor – Step 3 in IEEPA Replacement and its Impact
The White House initiated its third step in replacing IEEPA tariffs on Friday, July 24. Specifically, the U.S. Trade Representative (“USTR”) published final Section 301 findings and duty rates for imports from 30 countries following its investigation of harms on the domestic industry due to forced labor in those countries’ supply chains.
New York City’s Protected Time Off Law (PTOL) Final Rules Effective as of July 23, 2026
The New York City Department of Consumer and Worker Protection (DCWP) has adopted final rules implementing the City’s significantly expanded Earned Safe and Sick Time Act (ESSTA), now referred to as the Protected Time Off Law (PTOL).