Client Alerts & Insights
Telehealth Expansion is Here to Stay… And Continue to Expand
March 12, 2021
Authored By:
In 2020, Americans locked down and logged on to stay connected to their providers. Thanks to a recent report by FAIR Health, the significance of these connections is now more clear. The report found that private payor telehealth claims rose nearly 3000% in 2020. This dramatic increase followed the significant relaxation of telehealth requirements for billing promulgated in many states in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Mental health dominated the reported claims, accounting for just over 47% of all telehealth diagnoses, a diagnosis that did not even break into the top five in 2019. The report also found that the use of telehealth grew in both rural and urban areas, which is notable considering the pre-pandemic focus on telehealth in rural areas. While this report excluded Medicare and Medicaid claims, additional data related to governmental payor claims for telehealth is expected. For instance, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General is set to release an examination of expanded telehealth services offered by state Medicaid programs later this year.
Telehealth has not signaled a slowdown and appears to have bipartisan support in its further expansion with the introduction of the Protecting Access to Post-COVID–19 Telehealth Act of 2021. This Act would formalize and build upon the expansion of telehealth for Medicare patients authorized during the pandemic. The legislation specifically seeks to:
- Eliminate Medicare’s geographic and originating site restrictions.
- Establish a patient’s home as an eligible originating site.
- Authorize the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Service (“CMS”) to continue Public Health Emergency (“PHE”) reimbursement expansion for telehealth for 90 days beyond the eventual end of the PHE.
As patients and providers continue to turn to telehealth delivery models, it is important to ensure compliance with evolving state and federal regulations regarding data privacy, scope of practice, and billing requirements. This is especially true, considering the number of mental health claims and need, which require additional protections due to the sensitive nature of such diagnoses.
Moreover, the demand and de-stigmatization of mental health care self-care in the United States is driving health investment from both governmental and private funds, including the Federal Communications Commission, the U.S. Department of Agriculture, and venture funds.
Please contact your Benesch attorney for clarification of any particular issue related to mental health, telehealth services, or investment to support this expanding area.
Lauri Cooper at lcooper@beneschlaw.com, 216-363-6174
Please also consult our Benesch COVID-19 Resource Center for sources and additional information regarding COVID-19.
Latest News
LEAD vs. ACO REACH–What’s Changing and Why the LEAD Model Matters for ACOs and Participating Providers
The Long-term Enhanced ACO Design (“LEAD”) model is Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Innovation Center’s (Innovation Center) newly announced successor to the ACO Realizing Equity, Access, and Community Health (REACH) model. While LEAD retains the core framework of two-sided risk and population-based payments, it introduces critical changes aimed at making the program more sustainable, inclusive and effective to foster longer term administration for providers.
CMS Puts Specialists in the Game with LEAD
For years, many specialist physicians have watched Medicare’s ACO programs from the sidelines, uncertain how to participate in models historically centered on primary care providers. The Long-term Enhanced ACO Design (LEAD) Model marks a fundamental shift in this dynamic.
CMS Bets on the Long Game with 10‑Year LEAD ACO Model
The Long-term Enhanced ACO Design (LEAD) Model is the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation’s (Innovation Center) next-generation accountable care initiative, created to succeed the ACO REACH model in 2027.
Raising the Bar: Ohio Moves to Increase Tort Damages Caps for the First Time in Two Decades
The General Assembly is making progress on a pair of bills that would increase Ohio’s statutory caps on noneconomic damages in tort cases. House Bill 447 (“H.B. 447”) and its counterpart, Senate Bill 292 (“S.B. 292”), were introduced in September and October 2025, respectively.