Client Alerts & Insights
Telehealth Expansion is Here to Stay… And Continue to Expand
March 12, 2021
Authored By:
In 2020, Americans locked down and logged on to stay connected to their providers. Thanks to a recent report by FAIR Health, the significance of these connections is now more clear. The report found that private payor telehealth claims rose nearly 3000% in 2020. This dramatic increase followed the significant relaxation of telehealth requirements for billing promulgated in many states in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Mental health dominated the reported claims, accounting for just over 47% of all telehealth diagnoses, a diagnosis that did not even break into the top five in 2019. The report also found that the use of telehealth grew in both rural and urban areas, which is notable considering the pre-pandemic focus on telehealth in rural areas. While this report excluded Medicare and Medicaid claims, additional data related to governmental payor claims for telehealth is expected. For instance, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General is set to release an examination of expanded telehealth services offered by state Medicaid programs later this year.
Telehealth has not signaled a slowdown and appears to have bipartisan support in its further expansion with the introduction of the Protecting Access to Post-COVID–19 Telehealth Act of 2021. This Act would formalize and build upon the expansion of telehealth for Medicare patients authorized during the pandemic. The legislation specifically seeks to:
- Eliminate Medicare’s geographic and originating site restrictions.
- Establish a patient’s home as an eligible originating site.
- Authorize the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Service (“CMS”) to continue Public Health Emergency (“PHE”) reimbursement expansion for telehealth for 90 days beyond the eventual end of the PHE.
As patients and providers continue to turn to telehealth delivery models, it is important to ensure compliance with evolving state and federal regulations regarding data privacy, scope of practice, and billing requirements. This is especially true, considering the number of mental health claims and need, which require additional protections due to the sensitive nature of such diagnoses.
Moreover, the demand and de-stigmatization of mental health care self-care in the United States is driving health investment from both governmental and private funds, including the Federal Communications Commission, the U.S. Department of Agriculture, and venture funds.
Please contact your Benesch attorney for clarification of any particular issue related to mental health, telehealth services, or investment to support this expanding area.
Lauri Cooper at lcooper@beneschlaw.com, 216-363-6174
Please also consult our Benesch COVID-19 Resource Center for sources and additional information regarding COVID-19.
Latest News
Word on the Street: Key Insights from the 2026 National Association of Attorneys General Presidential Summit
The 2026 NAAG Presidential Initiative Summit highlighted the issues currently top of mind for state attorneys general, including consumer protection, affordability, healthcare, data privacy, artificial intelligence and antitrust enforcement.
SCOTUS Rules That States May Limit Women’s and Girls’ Sports to Biological Females – Another Chapter in the Delicate Legislative Balance Between Title IX and the Equal Protection Clause
Key Takeaways I. Background and Procedural History The Supreme Court consolidated two cases challenging state laws that restrict participation in …
Is Florida the New Hot Jurisdiction for Defamation Cases?
Florida is emerging as a favorable venue for defamation lawsuits because its long-arm statute makes it easier to bring out-of-state publishers into court—but plaintiffs still must clear the same substantive legal hurdles once the case gets there.
Forced Labor Tariffs – Public Comments Due Next Week for USTR Section 301 Investigation
US importers have the opportunity to submit public comment on proposed tariffs that will utilize Section 301 as a means of addressing forced labor in global supply chains. Comments are due to the U.S. Trade Representative (“USTR”) by July 6, 2026.