Client Alerts & Insights
The CDC Redefines “Close Contact”
December 3, 2020
Authored By:
Update – At a news briefing on December 2, 2020, the CDC offered two alternatives to shorten the quarantine period by those deemed to be “close contacts” of someone infected with COVID-19. Those without symptoms may end quarantine after seven days, after they had a negative test for the virus, or after 10 days without a negative test. P.C.R. or rapid tests are acceptable, the agency said, and should be taken within 48 hours of the end of the quarantine period. The CDC maintained that the safest option is to quarantine for 14 days following potential exposure to the virus.
The Centers for Disease Control recently changed the definition of “close contact,” as it relates to an individual’s exposure to someone with a confirmed case of COVID-19. In the prior guidance, the CDC defined “close contact” as an individual’s being within six feet of an infected person for fifteen consecutive minutes. With the change, the CDC now defines “close contact” as an individual’s being within six feet of an infected person for a cumulative total of fifteen minutes or more over a 24-hour period, starting from two days before the onset of symptoms from the infected person’s illness.
The change comes after a study reported spread of COVID-19 at a Vermont prison where an employee contracted COVID-19 after short, brief contacts with an infected incarcerated individual, which added up to more than 15 minutes over the course of the employee’s 8-hour shift.
This new definition will directly impact employers’ COVID-19 practices. The CDC had recommended that employers not permit employees to enter the workplace for 14 days following “close contact” with someone having COVID-19. Now, employers will need to determine who may have had “close contact” with someone having COVID-19 for a cumulative 15-minute period over the course of a 24-hour period, including persons who were not experiencing symptoms at the time. Practically, this can be expected to increase the number of employees who employers must send home to quarantine.
Employers should continue to follow CDC and state public health department guidelines including the limiting of meetings and other situations which require less than six feet of distance between individuals. In addition, employers should change the definition of “close contact” in all of their screening procedures. Employers should also consider the CDC’s new definition when determining whether an employee’s infection was work-related for purposes of OSHA reporting and recordkeeping and workers’ compensation.
If you have any questions concerning the CDC’s new definition of “close contact” or anything else regarding how COVID-19 affects the workplace, contact the authors or any other attorney in Benesch’s Labor and Employment Practice Group.
Joseph N. Gross at jgross@beneschlaw.com or 216.363.4163.
Yelena G. Katz at ykatz@beneschlaw.com or 216.363.4405
Brad Wenclewicz at bwenclewicz@beneschlaw.com or 216.363.6191
***
Please note that this information is current as of the date of this Client Alert, based on the available data. However, because COVID-19’s status and updates related to the same are ongoing, we recommend real-time review of guidance distributed by the CDC and local officials.
Latest News
Delaware Adopts Uniform Assignment for the Benefit of Creditors Act, Expanding Bankruptcy Alternative for Distressed Companies
Customs compliance and enforcement defense are high-profile exercises within U.S.-based importers due to the higher-risk regulatory enforcement environment. One of the more complex hot topics facing compliance and legal professionals within importers of record (IORs) is the degree to which “assists” impact dutiable value, and therefore duty burden, in the eyes of U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP).
Where AI Regulation Stands Today Part 2: State Attorneys General as the Primary AI Enforcers
Customs compliance and enforcement defense are high-profile exercises within U.S.-based importers due to the higher-risk regulatory enforcement environment. One of the more complex hot topics facing compliance and legal professionals within importers of record (IORs) is the degree to which “assists” impact dutiable value, and therefore duty burden, in the eyes of U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP).
Customs Duty Assists: Regulatory Compliance Overview and FAQ
Customs compliance and enforcement defense are high-profile exercises within U.S.-based importers due to the higher-risk regulatory enforcement environment. One of the more complex hot topics facing compliance and legal professionals within importers of record (IORs) is the degree to which “assists” impact dutiable value, and therefore duty burden, in the eyes of U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP).
TSA Authorized Representatives—Emerging Practice of Engaging Freight Brokers and Its Practical Implications
Air transportation safety has long been of critical supply chain importance and geopolitical significance, and that role is growing. Supply chain constraints over this decade have driven a need for adaptation, modal diversification and cost containment. To do so, authorized air cargo providers have increasingly explored new ways to add capacity for regulated surface transportation.