Client Alerts & Insights
The Companionship Services Exemption: On the Verge of Extinction?
December 1, 2011
Recently, the Department of Labor (the “DOL”) issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (the “Notice”) that would prohibit third party employers from using the “companionship services” exemption to the minimum wage and overtime requirements of the Fair Labor Standards Act (the “FLSA”). Currently, Section 13(a)(15) of the FLSA provides third party employers with both a minimum wage and an overtime exemption for domestic service employees who provide companionship services for individuals who, because of age or infirmity, are unable to care for themselves (“companionship services”).
In the Notice, the DOL explains that the health care industry, as a whole, has undergone significant change in the last 35 years. The DOL reasons that it needs to amend its regulations because there has been and will continue to be an increase in the use of home health care workers and the circumstances surrounding the employment of these workers were not envisioned when the regulations were first promulgated. The DOL proposes to narrow the definition of “companionship services,” clarify the activities that are considered incidental to “companionship services,” and amend the regulation pertaining to third party employment of domestic workers who provide “companionship services.”
Significantly, the proposed rule would deny all third party employers the use of the minimum wage and overtime exemptions for workers who provide “companionship services.” The proposed rule would, however, continue to permit individuals, families, and households to use the exemption, subject to its revised interpretative guidance.
The DOL created a website specifically for this proposed rule. The website provides the Notice, frequently asked questions, and a fact sheet concerning the changes. Interested parties have until February 27, 2012 to submit written comments.
Benesch has significant experience defending employers’ rights under the “companionship services” exemption and regularly assists clients in providing comments to federal agencies.
To discuss the implications of the Notice and how it might affect your business, please contact one of the following Benesch attorneys:
Maynard (Mike) A. Buck at 216.363.4694 or mbuck@beneschlaw.com
Peter N. Kirsanow at 216.363.4481 or pkirsanow@beneschlaw.com
Joseph N. Gross at 216.363.4163 or jgross@beneschlaw.com
Patrick O. Peters at 216.363.4434 or ppeters@beneschlaw.com
Latest News
Influencer Marketing Under Fire: Gymshark Sued in New Class Action as Plaintiffs Target Undisclosed Paid Endorsements
Key Takeaways Overview Brands that leverage social-media influencers to promote products face a rapidly growing litigation threat. Over the past …
DOJ Announces 2026 National Health Care Fraud Takedown: 455 Defendants Charged in $6.5 Billion Enforcement Action
Unprecedented scale and coordination: Department of Justice’s (“DOJ”) 2026 National Health Care Fraud Takedown (the “Takedown”) charged 455 defendants tied to $6.5B in alleged fraud, highlighting a “whole-of-government” and international enforcement approach as it relates to combatting fraud in healthcare.
South Dakota’s Inaugural Anti-SLAPP Statute
South Dakota’s new Uniform Public Expression Protection Act, effective July 1, 2026, gives defendants in SLAPP suits a fast-track procedure for dismissal and fee recovery, expanding protections for free speech and public participation.
Supreme Court Clarifies Judicial Estoppel Standard in Bankruptcy Nondisclosure Cases
The U.S. Supreme Court rejected a rigid rule that often blocked debtors from pursuing claims they failed to disclose in bankruptcy. Courts must now look at the full circumstances before deciding whether an omission was intentional or an honest mistake.