Client Alerts & Insights

The DOL Abandons Rigid Six-Factor Intern Test and Adopts Court-Favored Approach

January 8, 2017

On January 5, 2018, the Department of Labor (“DOL”) adopted a more lenient standard for assessing whether interns qualify as employees under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”).  

Previously, in 2010, the DOL promulgated a more onerous six-factor test. Under that test, an intern was considered an employee unless each of six factors were met. Employers were forced to consider, for example, whether interns displaced any regular employees or whether they derived any “immediate advantage” from the interns’ work.

Now the DOL, in reducing the burden on employers, has aligned itself with several appellate courts and implemented the “primary beneficiary” test. This seven-factor test is derived out of a 2015 ruling by the Second Circuit Court of Appeals in Glatt v. Fox Searchlight Pictures, Inc. The test comprehensively analyzes the “economic realities” of an intern’s relationship with his or her employer to determine the “primary beneficiary” of the relationship and is more in line with the current test for determining independent contractor status.

The seven factors of the newly-implemented test are designed for flexibility and the DOL advises that in administering the test, the unique circumstances of each case should be considered. The factors primarily focus on the expectations of the parties, the educational benefits, and the correlations with formal courses of study.

The DOL has stated that it will update its enforcement policies and provide Wage and Hour Division investigators increased flexibility to holistically analyze internships on an ad hoc basis. This development is expected to benefit employers and ease employer concerns that interns will be inadvertently misclassified as employees.

If you have any questions on this topic please contact a member of our Labor & Employment Practice Group.

Eric Baisden (Chair) at ebaisden@beneschlaw.com or 216.363.4676.

Latest News

Client Alerts & Insights 5.1.26

$2B Trade Secrets Verdict Overturned by the Virginia Supreme Court

Recently, the Virginia Supreme Court vacated a $2B jury award and ordered a new trial in a state trade secrets action. The justices held that the circuit court judge made four significant errors leading to Virginia’s largest jury award. Significantly, according to the justices, the circuit court judge put an improper burden of proof on defendants to show that its sales were unrelated to the misappropriation to avoid plaintiff being awarded defendant’s full sales revenue as opposed to the plaintiff having the burden to show defendant’s actions proximately caused plaintiff’s damages.