Client Alerts & Insights
Tracking “Project Firewall” and Its Significant Expansion of H-1B Enforcement Activity
December 4, 2025
On September 19, 2025, the Department of Labor (DOL) announced a substantial expansion of its enforcement authority through a new initiative known as Project Firewall, marking the most aggressive shift in H-1B oversight in more than a decade. Historically, most H-1B investigations began only after an employee complaint. Under Project Firewall, however, the Secretary of Labor may now initiate H-1B investigations based solely on “reasonable cause.” Given the unprecedented level of cooperation between government agencies, it is not surprising that immigration practitioners are reporting a notable increase in investigative activity. To date, approximately 175–200 investigations under Project Firewall have been initiated, signaling vigorous and proactive enforcement in the H-1B space.
Key Elements of Project Firewall
1. Expanded Scope of Review – Investigations are now focusing on:
- Required wage compliance and payroll accuracy
- Alignment of actual job duties with those listed in the H-1B petition
- Accuracy of worksite locations and relocation reporting
- Maintenance of fully compliant Public Access Files
- H-1B-dependent employer practices
- Third-party placement arrangements, including staffing and consulting environments
2. Consequences for Non-Compliance – Employers found non-compliant may face:
- Back wage assessments
- Civil monetary penalties
- Debarment from the H-1B program for up to three years
- Referral to USCIS or other agencies for additional action
Recommended Employer Action Steps
Given the heightened enforcement environment, employers should take immediate steps to review and strengthen their H-1B compliance programs:
- Conduct an Internal H-1B Compliance Audit – Review LCAs, wage documentation, worksite postings and Public Access Files for completeness and accuracy.
- Reconfirm Wage Compliance – Ensure all H-1B workers are being paid the required wage at all times, including during reduced hours or non-productive periods.
- Assess Job Duties and Organizational Changes – If job duties or responsibilities have changed, determine whether an H-1B amendment is required.
- Review Third-Party Placement Arrangements – Confirm that contracts, supervision structures and worksite details accurately reflect actual working conditions.
- Educate HR, Managers, and Onboarding Teams – Ensure internal stakeholders understand when H-1B updates or amendments are triggered.
- Prepare for Potential DOL Requests – Establish a protocol for responding to inquiries or audits, including record preservation and centralized documentation.
Conclusion
With Project Firewall investigations steadily increasing, employers should act now to mitigate risk by proactively reviewing their H-1B processes and documentation. Our immigration team is available to assist with internal audits, policy reviews and employer-specific compliance strategies.
Latest News
Ohio Board of Professional Conduct Issues Ohio Ethics Guide on Artificial Intelligence for Lawyers and Judicial Officers
Dispensary tip practices—especially involving hybrid roles like “Leads” or Agents-in-Charge—are increasingly being scrutinized as unlawful as a surge in wage-and-hour lawsuits claim that managers or employees with supervisory duties are improperly sharing in tips meant for front-line staff.
State AGs are Busy Bees: Benesch Continues to Monitor the Implications of Recent State AG Actions
State attorneys general are ramping up enforcement and guidance across a wide range of issues—from consumer protection and pricing transparency to AI use, data privacy and environmental harms—stepping in to fill perceived federal gaps.
Connecticut Broadens Data Privacy Act Requirements Effective July 1, 2026
Key Takeaways Revised Applicability Scope and Exemptions Effective July 1, 2026, the CTDPA’s existing applicability thresholds are reduced, resulting in …
SCOTUS Extends FAA Exemption to Last-Mile Drivers: What the Flowers Foods decision means for motor carriers and transportation providers
On May 28, 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a unanimous decision in Flowers Foods, Inc. v. Brock, expanding reach of the Federal Arbitration Act’s (“FAA”) Section 1 exemption for transportation workers engaged in interstate commerce. The Court held that a worker who transports goods on an intrastate leg of an interstate journey can qualify for Section 1’s exemption without crossing state lines or interacting with vehicles that do. This decision has significant implications for motor carriers and transportation providers that rely on arbitration agreements to resolve disputes with independent contractors and employee drivers.