Client Alerts & Insights
Tracking “Project Firewall” and Its Significant Expansion of H-1B Enforcement Activity
December 4, 2025
On September 19, 2025, the Department of Labor (DOL) announced a substantial expansion of its enforcement authority through a new initiative known as Project Firewall, marking the most aggressive shift in H-1B oversight in more than a decade. Historically, most H-1B investigations began only after an employee complaint. Under Project Firewall, however, the Secretary of Labor may now initiate H-1B investigations based solely on “reasonable cause.” Given the unprecedented level of cooperation between government agencies, it is not surprising that immigration practitioners are reporting a notable increase in investigative activity. To date, approximately 175–200 investigations under Project Firewall have been initiated, signaling vigorous and proactive enforcement in the H-1B space.
Key Elements of Project Firewall
1. Expanded Scope of Review – Investigations are now focusing on:
- Required wage compliance and payroll accuracy
- Alignment of actual job duties with those listed in the H-1B petition
- Accuracy of worksite locations and relocation reporting
- Maintenance of fully compliant Public Access Files
- H-1B-dependent employer practices
- Third-party placement arrangements, including staffing and consulting environments
2. Consequences for Non-Compliance – Employers found non-compliant may face:
- Back wage assessments
- Civil monetary penalties
- Debarment from the H-1B program for up to three years
- Referral to USCIS or other agencies for additional action
Recommended Employer Action Steps
Given the heightened enforcement environment, employers should take immediate steps to review and strengthen their H-1B compliance programs:
- Conduct an Internal H-1B Compliance Audit – Review LCAs, wage documentation, worksite postings and Public Access Files for completeness and accuracy.
- Reconfirm Wage Compliance – Ensure all H-1B workers are being paid the required wage at all times, including during reduced hours or non-productive periods.
- Assess Job Duties and Organizational Changes – If job duties or responsibilities have changed, determine whether an H-1B amendment is required.
- Review Third-Party Placement Arrangements – Confirm that contracts, supervision structures and worksite details accurately reflect actual working conditions.
- Educate HR, Managers, and Onboarding Teams – Ensure internal stakeholders understand when H-1B updates or amendments are triggered.
- Prepare for Potential DOL Requests – Establish a protocol for responding to inquiries or audits, including record preservation and centralized documentation.
Conclusion
With Project Firewall investigations steadily increasing, employers should act now to mitigate risk by proactively reviewing their H-1B processes and documentation. Our immigration team is available to assist with internal audits, policy reviews and employer-specific compliance strategies.
Latest News
Versata v. Ford: Federal Circuit Reinstates $82M Award and Opens Door to Even Greater Damages
Recently, the Federal Circuit affirmed the Eastern District of Michigan’s ruling that Ford Motor Company (“Ford”) misappropriated Versata Software Inc.’s (“Versata”) trade secrets and breached a software licensing agreement. The three-judge panel ordered a new trial on trade secret damages, finding that the lower court improperly limited available damages theories, and reinstated the jury’s $82.3 million award from Ford’s breach of the software licensing agreement.
UPDATED: The Faster Labor Contracts Act Would Permit Federal Government to Impose Union Contract Terms on Employers
The federal government may soon be able to impose the terms of first collective bargaining agreements (“CBAs”) on private sector employers and unions.
Tariff Refund Litigation: A Primer on Common Plaintiff’s Theories of Recovery and Importer of Record Defenses
In February 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that President Trump did not have constitutional authority to impose tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). The Trump Administration responded quickly, implementing a universal 10 percent surcharge under the authority of Section 122 of the U.S. Trade Act.
Supreme Court 2025: Key Free Speech Rulings
The Supreme Court’s 2025 decisions signaled a more regulator-friendly view of the internet—upholding laws on age verification and foreign-owned platforms under intermediate scrutiny, even where speech is burdened. These cases reaffirm that content-neutral rules that incidentally affect speech are likely to survive constitutional challenge.