Client Alerts & Insights
U.S. Supreme Court Opened the Flood Gate Today. Be Prepared.
February 21, 2008
We only provide alerts to you when there is a development in ERISA that is striking and significant.The decision today in LaRue v. DeWolff, Boberg & Associates, Inc. is just such a development.The Supreme Court has now authorized individual claims for fiduciary breach in defined contribution plans, when alleged fiduciary breaches may impair the value of a participant’s account.This means that a participant who believes that an investment instruction was not followed, for example, has a direct cause of action against the fiduciaries for money damages under ERISA.
Until now, most Courts have upheld the dictate from the Supreme Court in Massachusetts Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. Russell that precluded such actions, unless such an action was made on behalf of the entire plan, not for an individual.LaRue has altered this holding.Referring to the Russell emphasis on protecting an entire Plan, Justice Stevens suggests:”That landscape has changed.”
Naturally, separate concurring opinions by Justices Roberts/Kennedy and Scalia/Thomas have placed some uncertainty into the mix.Roberts opines that such individual relief may be better placed within the context of a claim for benefits, rather than as a claim for breach of fiduciary duty.A claim for benefits would be subject to the plan’s claims process.Scalia concurs, but bases his rationale on the language of the statute, not any change in the landscape.
Ultimately, this means a greater threat to defined contribution plans from Plaintiffs seeking redress.In anticipation of this decision and based on other activity in this arena, The Benesch Benefits Team has developed the Bensech Investment Advisory 360 (“BIA360”)™.This IA360 involves a review and analysis of investment policies, practices, decision-making and an administrative operation review module, to assess processes for investments by plan third party administrators.
If you have any questions on this or any related matters, please call Jeffrey D. Zimon, Chair – Employee Benefits and Compensation Department, Co-Chair ERISA Litigation Group, jzimon@bfca.com (216-363-4657) or Anna Raske, Esq. Co-Chair ERISA Litigation Group araske@bfca.com (216-363-4552).
Latest News
Nobody—Not Even Einstein—Has Figured Out What Causes Gravity, but You Need to if You Are Facing a Putative Consumer Class Action in the 9th Circuit
The common argument made by plaintiffs that differences in alleged misrepresentations are transcended by the center of the gravity of the alleged fraud should not be addressed through the typical approach of just comparing the level of variance of the representations in the case at issue with that in the relevant precedent.
The Faster Labor Contracts Act Would Permit Federal Government to Impose Union Contract Terms on Employers
The federal government may soon be able to impose the terms of first collective bargaining agreements (“CBAs”) on private sector employers and unions.
Going Back to the “Well”: Plaintiffs Target Wellness Branding by Attacking Ingredients
Plaintiffs are increasingly targeting food and beverage companies’ “wellness” and “free-from” marketing claims, focusing on ingredient-level details that allegedly contradict broad statements on the labels.
The CFTC’s New Cooperation Playbook: What Practitioners Need to Know About Letter No. 26-15
In a recent Staff Advisory to the Enforcement Division , the Commodities and Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”) released guidance on how companies can avoid enforcement actions—or receive substantial penalty reductions—through early and full disclosure of potential misconduct.