Client Alerts & Insights
UK and AI: The United Kingdom’s Approach to Artificial Intelligence Regulation
August 29, 2023
Authored By:
On the heels of the United Kingdom (UK) announcing its first global summit on artificial intelligence (AI) safety, British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak predicted that London could be the future epicenter of AI regulation. The announcements come as the UK and US have declared a stronger collaboration to tackle AI-related challenges.
The priority of the summit, which is expected to take place in the fall of 2023, is to discuss an internationally coordinated plan to regulate the technology’s growth. Meanwhile, the prime minister and U.S. President Joe Biden continue to meet regularly to coordinate approaches to AI guidelines and regulations.
Unlike the EU, which has adopted a risk-based approach to AI and already approved draft legislation to closely oversee AI, the UK does not plan to enact new laws aimed at governing the technology. Nor does it plan to create new regulatory positions. Rather, the government intends to apply its existing privacy laws and current regulators to oversee AI. Exactly how remains unclear though.
The UK has created a taskforce to collaborate with generative AI models, such as Open AI’s ChatGPT and Google’s Bard, to establish safety and security standards. It will also analyze the strengths of AI to leverage the technology in the country.
The taskforce follows the release of a government policy document in March 2023 which touts the UK’s pro-growth and innovation approach to AI regulation. While the document lacks detail on AI infrastructure for the country, it describes five key principles which regulators will need to abide by when constructing the UK’s regulatory framework: safety, security, and robustness – AI models need to be safe and secure; transparency and explainability – it’s imperative that AI companies be transparent about how their systems work and how they make decisions; fairness – AI systems should not be discriminatory toward individuals or create unfair commercial outcomes; accountability and governance – effective oversight of AI models is necessary; contestability and redress – parties should be able to dispute harmful decisions generated by AI.
Over the next year, the UK is expected to issue guidance to AI companies on how to implement the five principles into their models. It may also pass legislation, granting regulators the authority to ensure the principles are followed.
For additional information, please contact:
Kristopher J. Chandler at kchandler@beneschlaw.com or 614.223.9377.
Latest News
Customs Duty Assists: Regulatory Compliance Overview and FAQ
Customs compliance and enforcement defense are high-profile exercises within U.S.-based importers due to the higher-risk regulatory enforcement environment. One of the more complex hot topics facing compliance and legal professionals within importers of record (IORs) is the degree to which “assists” impact dutiable value, and therefore duty burden, in the eyes of U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP).
TSA Authorized Representatives—Emerging Practice of Engaging Freight Brokers and Its Practical Implications
Air transportation safety has long been of critical supply chain importance and geopolitical significance, and that role is growing. Supply chain constraints over this decade have driven a need for adaptation, modal diversification and cost containment. To do so, authorized air cargo providers have increasingly explored new ways to add capacity for regulated surface transportation.
Chameleon Carriers—FMCSA’s “Reincarnated” Rule and Enforcement
As the U.S. DOT and its FMCSA ramp up certain elements of domestic enforcement, regulators are utilizing existing laws and regulations that previously were not often invoked. Enforcement of the English language proficiency requirement is one great example.
What’s Old Is New Again: Broker Liability Insulation from the Case Law in the Post-Montgomery Era
The Supreme Court has spoken in its Montgomery v. Caribe Transport decision, and the brokerage sector, and even shipper and motor carriers, are working toward adapting to this “new liability regime.”