Client Alerts & Insights
UPDATE: Refunds for Section 301 Tariff Duties – You Have Time for List 4
October 9, 2020
Authored By:
A flurry of activity recently consumed domestic industry and law firms, including Benesch, as domestic importers sought to maximize the potential for relief from the Section 301 duties against Chinese goods, while staring down a conservative read on the statute of limitations for List 3 claims. Importers keenly focused upon refunds filed suits seeking recovery of duties and attacking the China tariffs on the grounds that the United States Trade Representative missed certain technical requirements under the Trade Act and the Administrative Procedures Act. In only a matter of days, there were thousands, yes thousands, of lawsuits filed before the U.S. Court of International Trade (“CIT”).
Time remains for some importers who paid Section 301 duties but did not have the opportunity or specific awareness to participate in these filings. The nationwide concern that a statute of limitations may bar some or all available recovery was focused upon List 3 of the China tariffs. However, the $300 Billion trade action under List 4 of the tariffs is subject to a different, and more generous, timeline for filing suit. Importers that are paying List 4A duties have until August 20, 2021, most conservatively, before the relevant statute of limitations may apply.
Benesch has assisted many importers in preserving their rights to potential recovery. We recommend that those importers in need of refunds, but who have not yet taken action, move swiftly to likewise file before the CIT if appropriate. We believe that it is opportune to file now, and not wait until the statute of limitations deadline. These legal issues are now squarely before the CIT, and bedrock issues that could impact List 4 claims, are being adjudicated. Our CIT and customs team is standing by to assist in determining courses of action.
Jonathan Todd is a Partner with Benesch’s Transportation & Logistics Practice Group. He is a licensed U.S. Customs Broker in addition to an attorney. You may reach him at 216-363-4658 or jtodd@beneschlaw.com.
Latest News
The Coming State-Law Litigation Wave of 2026-27: “Subscription Trap” Class Actions
The subscription economy keeps growing—and so does the wave of class-action litigation targeting it. While the FTC’s regulatory efforts have drawn headlines, private class actions under state laws pose an even greater exposure risk.
Updates to Fees and Grace Periods for Nonimmigrant Visas
Starting September 9, 2026, the 9-11 Response Biometric Entry-Exit Fee will apply to H-1B and L-1 extension petitions filed by employers subject to the fee. Prior to the new rule, the fee was only required for (1) initial grant of status to a foreign national seeking H-1B or L-1 status and (2) a change of employer in the same status.
Third Circuit Decision Reshapes Creditor Standing in Successor Liability Disputes
The Third Circuit recently held that when determining whether a successor liability claim belongs to a bankruptcy estate, the key question is whether the claim seeks to remedy harm suffered by all creditors collectively or a unique injury suffered by a specific creditor. The fact that creditors may be permitted to bring the claim outside of bankruptcy is not, by itself, determinative.
CMS Proposes Sweeping Restrictions on Remote Patient Monitoring: The Outsourcing Ban, Reimbursement Revaluation and Potential Code Consolidation in the CY 2027 Physician Fee Schedule Proposed Rule
CMS’s CY 2027 Proposed Rule would significantly restrict Medicare reimbursement for Remote Patient Monitoring (RPM) and Remote Therapeutic Monitoring (RTM), including banning outsourced clinical staffing, adding new patient-relationship and initiating-visit requirements, reducing certain reimbursement rates, and exploring consolidation of existing billing codes.